One-year results of trabeculectomy with emphasis on the effect of patients' age.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Yuto Iwaki, Sotaro Mori, Mina Okuda-Arai, Fumio Takano, Kaori Ueda, Mari Sakamoto, Yuko Yamada-Nakanishi, Makoto Nakamura
{"title":"One-year results of trabeculectomy with emphasis on the effect of patients' age.","authors":"Yuto Iwaki, Sotaro Mori, Mina Okuda-Arai, Fumio Takano, Kaori Ueda, Mari Sakamoto, Yuko Yamada-Nakanishi, Makoto Nakamura","doi":"10.1007/s10384-024-01131-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the association between one-year surgical outcomes following trabeculectomy and age, accounting for confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Analyzing data from 305 patients undergoing initial trabeculectomy from 2019 onward, we employed three approaches to adjust variables: stratified analysis, regression analysis, and propensity score matching. Surgical success at 1-year post-surgery was defined by two criteria: achieving intraocular pressure of between 5 and 15 mmHg with a ≥ 20% reduction compared to pre-surgery levels and no additional glaucoma surgery (Criterion A); achieving intraocular pressure of between 5 and 12 mmHg with a ≥ 30% reduction compared to pre-surgery levels and no additional glaucoma surgery (Criterion B).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stratified analysis by age unveiled a significant increase in exfoliation glaucoma (XFG) and a trend towards shorter axial lengths with advancing age (both p < 0.0001). Older age groups were more likely to experience surgical failure in both Criterion A and B (p = 0.21, < 0.01). Univariate analysis showed age as a significant factor in surgical failure for Criterion A (p < 0.05) and a nearly significant factor for Criterion B (p = 0.12). However, this trend was not evident in multivariate analysis (p = 0.23/0.88), where XFG became a significant factor for surgical failure (both p < 0.001) in Criteria A and B. Propensity score matching revealed no significant differences in surgical success rates for Criteria A and B between younger and older patients (p = 1.00 and 0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Age is not a primary determinant of failure in trabeculectomy; however, the increasing incidence of XFG with aging suggests a potential for poorer outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14563,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-024-01131-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the association between one-year surgical outcomes following trabeculectomy and age, accounting for confounding factors.

Study design: Retrospective observational study.

Method: Analyzing data from 305 patients undergoing initial trabeculectomy from 2019 onward, we employed three approaches to adjust variables: stratified analysis, regression analysis, and propensity score matching. Surgical success at 1-year post-surgery was defined by two criteria: achieving intraocular pressure of between 5 and 15 mmHg with a ≥ 20% reduction compared to pre-surgery levels and no additional glaucoma surgery (Criterion A); achieving intraocular pressure of between 5 and 12 mmHg with a ≥ 30% reduction compared to pre-surgery levels and no additional glaucoma surgery (Criterion B).

Results: Stratified analysis by age unveiled a significant increase in exfoliation glaucoma (XFG) and a trend towards shorter axial lengths with advancing age (both p < 0.0001). Older age groups were more likely to experience surgical failure in both Criterion A and B (p = 0.21, < 0.01). Univariate analysis showed age as a significant factor in surgical failure for Criterion A (p < 0.05) and a nearly significant factor for Criterion B (p = 0.12). However, this trend was not evident in multivariate analysis (p = 0.23/0.88), where XFG became a significant factor for surgical failure (both p < 0.001) in Criteria A and B. Propensity score matching revealed no significant differences in surgical success rates for Criteria A and B between younger and older patients (p = 1.00 and 0.88).

Conclusion: Age is not a primary determinant of failure in trabeculectomy; however, the increasing incidence of XFG with aging suggests a potential for poorer outcomes.

强调患者年龄影响的小梁切除术一年结果。
目的:本研究调查了小梁切除术后一年手术结果与年龄之间的关系,并考虑了混杂因素:回顾性观察研究:我们采用了三种方法来调整变量:分层分析、回归分析和倾向得分匹配。术后1年的手术成功率由两个标准定义:眼压达到5至15 mmHg,与术前水平相比降低≥20%,且未再进行青光眼手术(标准A);眼压达到5至12 mmHg,与术前水平相比降低≥30%,且未再进行青光眼手术(标准B):结果:按年龄进行的分层分析显示,随着年龄的增长,剥脱性青光眼(XFG)显著增加,轴长呈缩短趋势(均为 p 结论:年龄不是决定青光眼发病率的主要因素:年龄并不是小梁切除术失败的主要决定因素;但是,随着年龄的增长,XFG的发生率也在增加,这表明可能会出现较差的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (JJO) was inaugurated in 1957 as a quarterly journal published in English by the Ophthalmology Department of the University of Tokyo, with the aim of disseminating the achievements of Japanese ophthalmologists worldwide. JJO remains the only Japanese ophthalmology journal published in English. In 1997, the Japanese Ophthalmological Society assumed the responsibility for publishing the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology as its official English-language publication. Currently the journal is published bimonthly and accepts papers from authors worldwide. JJO has become an international interdisciplinary forum for the publication of basic science and clinical research papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信