Efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid for bile reflux after distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: A secondary analysis of the PEGASUS-D randomized clinical trial.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Dong Kee Jang, Young Suk Park, Moon-Won Yoo, Sun-Hwi Hwang, Seong-Yeob Ryu, Oh Kyoung Kwon, Hoon Hur, Hong Man Yoon, Bang Wool Eom, Hye Seong Ahn, Taeil Son, Kyo Young Song, Han Hong Lee, Min-Gew Choi, Ji Yeong An, Sang-Il Lee, Sang Hyub Lee, Do Joong Park
{"title":"Efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid for bile reflux after distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: A secondary analysis of the PEGASUS-D randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Dong Kee Jang, Young Suk Park, Moon-Won Yoo, Sun-Hwi Hwang, Seong-Yeob Ryu, Oh Kyoung Kwon, Hoon Hur, Hong Man Yoon, Bang Wool Eom, Hye Seong Ahn, Taeil Son, Kyo Young Song, Han Hong Lee, Min-Gew Choi, Ji Yeong An, Sang-Il Lee, Sang Hyub Lee, Do Joong Park","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have been conducted on the prevention of bile reflux in gastric cancer patients who have undergone gastrectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in preventing bile reflux after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a secondary analysis of the PEGASUS-D trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Adults with a diagnosis of gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy were enrolled. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive 300 mg of UDCA, 600 mg of UDCA, or placebo at a ratio of 1:1:1. UDCA and placebo were administered daily for 52 weeks. The primary outcomes included bile reflux symptoms at each time point, percentage of participants with bile reflux, and the grade of gastritis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 521 participants who underwent randomization, 151, 164, and 150 participants were analyzed from the 300 mg UDCA, 600 mg UDCA, and placebo groups, respectively. The difference in symptoms between the three groups was not significant. Bile reflux was less evident in the UDCA group than in the placebo group; however, this difference was significant only in the 300-mg group at 12 months post-operation (odds ratio, 0.44; P = 0.0076). A significant reduction in gastritis was also observed in the 300-mg group at 12 months post-operation (odds ratio, 0.50; P = 0.0368) compared to the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that UDCA administration significantly reduced bile reflux and gastritis by approximately 50% at the 12 months-postoperative follow-up in patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Few studies have been conducted on the prevention of bile reflux in gastric cancer patients who have undergone gastrectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in preventing bile reflux after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.

Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of the PEGASUS-D trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Adults with a diagnosis of gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy were enrolled. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive 300 mg of UDCA, 600 mg of UDCA, or placebo at a ratio of 1:1:1. UDCA and placebo were administered daily for 52 weeks. The primary outcomes included bile reflux symptoms at each time point, percentage of participants with bile reflux, and the grade of gastritis.

Results: Among 521 participants who underwent randomization, 151, 164, and 150 participants were analyzed from the 300 mg UDCA, 600 mg UDCA, and placebo groups, respectively. The difference in symptoms between the three groups was not significant. Bile reflux was less evident in the UDCA group than in the placebo group; however, this difference was significant only in the 300-mg group at 12 months post-operation (odds ratio, 0.44; P = 0.0076). A significant reduction in gastritis was also observed in the 300-mg group at 12 months post-operation (odds ratio, 0.50; P = 0.0368) compared to the placebo group.

Conclusions: This study showed that UDCA administration significantly reduced bile reflux and gastritis by approximately 50% at the 12 months-postoperative follow-up in patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

熊去氧胆酸治疗胃癌远端胃切除术后胆汁反流的疗效:PEGASUS-D 随机临床试验的二次分析。
背景:关于预防胃癌患者胃切除术后胆汁反流的研究很少。本研究旨在评估熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)预防胃癌患者胃切除术后胆汁反流的有效性和安全性:本研究是对 PEGASUS-D 试验的二次分析,该试验是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。已确诊胃癌并接受胃切除术的成人参加了这项研究。符合条件的参与者按 1:1:1 的比例随机分配接受 300 毫克 UDCA、600 毫克 UDCA 或安慰剂。每天服用 UDCA 和安慰剂,持续 52 周。主要结果包括每个时间点的胆汁反流症状、胆汁反流参与者的百分比以及胃炎的等级:在接受随机分组的 521 名参与者中,300 毫克 UDCA 组、600 毫克 UDCA 组和安慰剂组分别有 151 人、164 人和 150 人接受了分析。三组之间的症状差异不大。与安慰剂组相比,UDCA 组的胆汁反流较不明显;但在术后 12 个月时,只有 300 毫克组的差异显著(几率比 0.44;P = 0.0076)。与安慰剂组相比,300 毫克组在手术后 12 个月胃炎也明显减少(几率比 0.50;P = 0.0368):这项研究表明,在术后 12 个月的随访中,服用 UDCA 能显著减少胃癌胃切除术患者约 50% 的胆汁反流和胃炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信