A Comprehensive and Repeatable Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Quantification Approach for Clinical Evaluations of Tumor Blood Flow.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Connor Krolak, Angela Wei, Marissa Shumaker, Manjiri Dighe, Michalakis Averkiou
{"title":"A Comprehensive and Repeatable Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Quantification Approach for Clinical Evaluations of Tumor Blood Flow.","authors":"Connor Krolak, Angela Wei, Marissa Shumaker, Manjiri Dighe, Michalakis Averkiou","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to define a comprehensive and repeatable contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging protocol and analysis method to quantitatively assess lesional blood flow. Easily repeatable CEUS evaluations are essential for longitudinal treatment monitoring. The quantification method described here aims to provide a structure for future clinical studies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis study included liver CEUS studies in 80 patients, 40 of which contained lesions (primarily hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 28). Each patient was given at least 2 injections of a microbubble contrast agent, and 60-second continuous loops were acquired for each injection to enable evaluation of repeatability. For each bolus injection, 1.2 mL of contrast was delivered, whereas continuous, stationary scanning was performed. Automated respiratory gating and motion compensation algorithms dealt with breathing motion. Similar in size regions of interest were drawn around the lesion and liver parenchyma, and time-intensity curves (TICs) with linearized image data were generated. Four bolus transit parameters, rise time (RT), mean transit time (MTT), peak intensity (PI), and area under the curve (AUC), were extracted either directly from the actual TIC data or from a lognormal distribution curve fitted to the TIC. Interinjection repeatability for each parameter was evaluated with coefficient of variation. A 95% confidence interval was calculated for all fitted lognormal distribution curve coefficient of determination (R2) values, which serves as a data quality metric. One-sample t tests were performed between values obtained from injection pairs and between the fitted lognormal distribution curve and direct extraction from the TIC calculation methods to establish there were no significant differences between injections and measurement precision, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average interinjection coefficient of variation with both the fitted curve and direct calculation of RT and MTT was less than 21%, whereas PI and AUC were less than 40% for lesion and parenchyma regions of interest. The 95% confidence interval for the R2 value of all fitted lognormal curves was [0.95, 0.96]. The 1-sample t test for interinjection value difference showed no significant differences, indicating there was no relationship between the order of the repeated bolus injections and the resulting parameters. The 1-sample t test between the values from the fitted lognormal distribution curve and the direct extraction from the TIC calculation found no statistically significant differences (α = 0.05) for all perfusion-related parameters except lesion and parenchyma PI and lesion MTT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scanning protocol and analysis method outlined and validated in this study provide easily repeatable quantitative evaluations of lesional blood flow with bolus transit parameters in CEUS data that were not available before. With vital features such as probe stabilization ideally performed with an articulated arm and an automated respiratory gating algorithm, we were able to achieve interinjection repeatability of blood flow parameters that are comparable or surpass levels currently established for clinical 2D CEUS scans. Similar values and interinjection repeatability were achieved between calculations from a fitted curve or directly from the data. This demonstrated not only the strength of the protocol to generate TICs with minimal noise, but also suggests that curve fitting might be avoided for a more standardized approach. Utilizing the imaging protocol and analysis method defined in this study, we aim for this methodology to potentially assist clinicians to assess true perfusion changes for treatment monitoring with CEUS in longitudinal studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001127","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to define a comprehensive and repeatable contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging protocol and analysis method to quantitatively assess lesional blood flow. Easily repeatable CEUS evaluations are essential for longitudinal treatment monitoring. The quantification method described here aims to provide a structure for future clinical studies.

Materials and methods: This retrospective analysis study included liver CEUS studies in 80 patients, 40 of which contained lesions (primarily hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 28). Each patient was given at least 2 injections of a microbubble contrast agent, and 60-second continuous loops were acquired for each injection to enable evaluation of repeatability. For each bolus injection, 1.2 mL of contrast was delivered, whereas continuous, stationary scanning was performed. Automated respiratory gating and motion compensation algorithms dealt with breathing motion. Similar in size regions of interest were drawn around the lesion and liver parenchyma, and time-intensity curves (TICs) with linearized image data were generated. Four bolus transit parameters, rise time (RT), mean transit time (MTT), peak intensity (PI), and area under the curve (AUC), were extracted either directly from the actual TIC data or from a lognormal distribution curve fitted to the TIC. Interinjection repeatability for each parameter was evaluated with coefficient of variation. A 95% confidence interval was calculated for all fitted lognormal distribution curve coefficient of determination (R2) values, which serves as a data quality metric. One-sample t tests were performed between values obtained from injection pairs and between the fitted lognormal distribution curve and direct extraction from the TIC calculation methods to establish there were no significant differences between injections and measurement precision, respectively.

Results: Average interinjection coefficient of variation with both the fitted curve and direct calculation of RT and MTT was less than 21%, whereas PI and AUC were less than 40% for lesion and parenchyma regions of interest. The 95% confidence interval for the R2 value of all fitted lognormal curves was [0.95, 0.96]. The 1-sample t test for interinjection value difference showed no significant differences, indicating there was no relationship between the order of the repeated bolus injections and the resulting parameters. The 1-sample t test between the values from the fitted lognormal distribution curve and the direct extraction from the TIC calculation found no statistically significant differences (α = 0.05) for all perfusion-related parameters except lesion and parenchyma PI and lesion MTT.

Conclusions: The scanning protocol and analysis method outlined and validated in this study provide easily repeatable quantitative evaluations of lesional blood flow with bolus transit parameters in CEUS data that were not available before. With vital features such as probe stabilization ideally performed with an articulated arm and an automated respiratory gating algorithm, we were able to achieve interinjection repeatability of blood flow parameters that are comparable or surpass levels currently established for clinical 2D CEUS scans. Similar values and interinjection repeatability were achieved between calculations from a fitted curve or directly from the data. This demonstrated not only the strength of the protocol to generate TICs with minimal noise, but also suggests that curve fitting might be avoided for a more standardized approach. Utilizing the imaging protocol and analysis method defined in this study, we aim for this methodology to potentially assist clinicians to assess true perfusion changes for treatment monitoring with CEUS in longitudinal studies.

用于肿瘤血流临床评估的全面可重复对比增强超声定量法
研究目的本研究旨在确定一种全面、可重复的对比增强超声(CEUS)成像方案和分析方法,以定量评估病变部位的血流量。易于重复的 CEUS 评估对于纵向治疗监测至关重要。本文介绍的量化方法旨在为未来的临床研究提供一个架构:这项回顾性分析研究包括对 80 名患者的肝脏 CEUS 研究,其中 40 名患者有病变(主要是肝细胞癌,n = 28)。每位患者至少注射 2 次微泡造影剂,每次注射均采集 60 秒的连续环路,以评估重复性。每次栓剂注射均注射 1.2 毫升造影剂,同时进行连续、静态扫描。自动呼吸门控和运动补偿算法处理呼吸运动。在病变和肝实质周围绘制大小相似的感兴趣区,并生成线性化图像数据的时间-强度曲线(TIC)。直接从实际 TIC 数据或根据 TIC 拟合的对数正态分布曲线中提取四个栓剂通过参数,即上升时间 (RT)、平均通过时间 (MTT)、峰值强度 (PI) 和曲线下面积 (AUC)。每个参数的注射间重复性用变异系数进行评估。对所有拟合对数正态分布曲线的判定系数(R2)值计算出 95% 的置信区间,作为数据质量指标。在注射对所获得的数值之间,以及在拟合对数正态分布曲线和直接从 TIC 计算方法中提取的数值之间分别进行了单样本 t 检验,以确定注射和测量精度之间没有显著差异:拟合曲线和直接计算 RT 和 MTT 的平均注射间变异系数均小于 21%,而病变和实质相关区域的 PI 和 AUC 均小于 40%。所有拟合对数正态曲线的 R2 值的 95% 置信区间为 [0.95, 0.96]。注射间值差异的 1 样本 t 检验无显著差异,表明重复栓剂注射的顺序与所得参数之间没有关系。在拟合对数正态分布曲线值与直接从 TIC 计算中提取的值之间进行的 1 样本 t 检验发现,除病变和实质 PI 以及病变 MTT 外,所有灌注相关参数的差异均无统计学意义(α = 0.05):本研究中概述并验证的扫描方案和分析方法,可对 CEUS 数据中的病变血流和栓子转运参数进行易于重复的定量评估,这在以前是无法实现的。通过使用铰接臂和自动呼吸门控算法理想地稳定探头等重要功能,我们能够实现血流参数的注射间重复性,其重复性可媲美或超过目前为临床二维CEUS扫描设定的水平。无论是根据拟合曲线计算还是直接根据数据计算,都能获得相似的数值和注射间重复性。这不仅证明了该方案在生成 TIC 时噪音极小的优势,还表明曲线拟合可以避免采用更标准化的方法。利用本研究中定义的成像方案和分析方法,我们希望这种方法能帮助临床医生评估真实的灌注变化,以便在纵向研究中利用 CEUS 进行治疗监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信