Pharmacotherapy for patients with calcium oxalate stones and abnormal urine chemistry: A systematic review and meta-analysis for the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Urinary Stones, Third Edition

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Yasuo Kohjimoto, Akinori Iba, Shimpei Yamashita, Masatoshi Higuchi, Ryusuke Deguchi, Ippei Chikazawa, Shiro Hinotsu, Satoshi Yamaguchi, Katsuhito Miyazawa, Isao Hara
{"title":"Pharmacotherapy for patients with calcium oxalate stones and abnormal urine chemistry: A systematic review and meta-analysis for the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Urinary Stones, Third Edition","authors":"Yasuo Kohjimoto,&nbsp;Akinori Iba,&nbsp;Shimpei Yamashita,&nbsp;Masatoshi Higuchi,&nbsp;Ryusuke Deguchi,&nbsp;Ippei Chikazawa,&nbsp;Shiro Hinotsu,&nbsp;Satoshi Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Katsuhito Miyazawa,&nbsp;Isao Hara","doi":"10.1111/iju.15608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the benefits and harms of pharmacotherapies for patients with calcium oxalate stones and abnormal urine chemistry. This article is a modified and detailed version of the commentary on Clinical Question 10 described in the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Urinary Stones, Third Edition. PubMed and Ichushi Web were searched through August 2020 for articles on pharmacotherapies for calcium oxalate stones (thiazides, citrate preparations, uric acid production inhibitors, and magnesium preparations). Two reviewers independently selected randomized controlled trials reporting reduction of stone recurrence and adverse drug reactions as outcomes and performed data extraction and quality assessment. Meta-analyses with random effects models and rating of the strength of evidence were performed. Pharmacotherapies were shown to significantly reduce stone recurrence (risk ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.35–0.63). Meanwhile, the pharmacotherapies increased adverse drug reactions leading to study dropout (risk ratio 2.51, 95% confidence interval 1.09–5.75) and adverse drug reactions/adverse events (risk ratio 1.95, 95% confidence interval 1.07–3.56). The reported adverse drug reactions were, however, mainly minor and did not frequently require discontinuation of medication (2%–16%). The strengths of evidence for both outcomes were rated as moderate, because the risk of bias, indirectness, inconsistency, imprecision, and publication bias were all serious except for one item. The overall strength of evidence across outcomes was therefore determined to be moderate. These results support the conditional recommendation to initiate pharmacotherapies for patients with calcium oxalate stones and abnormal urine chemistry.</p>","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":"32 1","pages":"16-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iju.15608","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iju.15608","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the benefits and harms of pharmacotherapies for patients with calcium oxalate stones and abnormal urine chemistry. This article is a modified and detailed version of the commentary on Clinical Question 10 described in the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Urinary Stones, Third Edition. PubMed and Ichushi Web were searched through August 2020 for articles on pharmacotherapies for calcium oxalate stones (thiazides, citrate preparations, uric acid production inhibitors, and magnesium preparations). Two reviewers independently selected randomized controlled trials reporting reduction of stone recurrence and adverse drug reactions as outcomes and performed data extraction and quality assessment. Meta-analyses with random effects models and rating of the strength of evidence were performed. Pharmacotherapies were shown to significantly reduce stone recurrence (risk ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.35–0.63). Meanwhile, the pharmacotherapies increased adverse drug reactions leading to study dropout (risk ratio 2.51, 95% confidence interval 1.09–5.75) and adverse drug reactions/adverse events (risk ratio 1.95, 95% confidence interval 1.07–3.56). The reported adverse drug reactions were, however, mainly minor and did not frequently require discontinuation of medication (2%–16%). The strengths of evidence for both outcomes were rated as moderate, because the risk of bias, indirectness, inconsistency, imprecision, and publication bias were all serious except for one item. The overall strength of evidence across outcomes was therefore determined to be moderate. These results support the conditional recommendation to initiate pharmacotherapies for patients with calcium oxalate stones and abnormal urine chemistry.

Abstract Image

草酸钙结石和尿化学异常患者的药物治疗:日本泌尿系结石治疗临床实践指南》第三版的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以评估药物疗法对草酸钙结石和尿化学异常患者的益处和危害。本文是对《日本泌尿系结石治疗临床实践指南》(第三版)中所述临床问题 10 评注的修改和详细版本。截止到 2020 年 8 月,我们在 PubMed 和 Ichushi Web 上检索了有关草酸钙结石药物疗法(噻嗪类药物、枸橼酸盐制剂、尿酸生成抑制剂和镁制剂)的文章。两名审稿人独立选择了以降低结石复发率和药物不良反应为结果的随机对照试验,并进行了数据提取和质量评估。采用随机效应模型进行了元分析,并对证据强度进行了评级。结果显示,药物治疗能显著降低结石复发率(风险比为 0.47,95% 置信区间为 0.35-0.63)。同时,药物疗法增加了导致研究退出的药物不良反应(风险比 2.51,95% 置信区间 1.09-5.75)和药物不良反应/不良事件(风险比 1.95,95% 置信区间 1.07-3.56)。不过,所报告的药物不良反应主要是轻微的,并不需要经常停药(2%-16%)。这两项结果的证据强度均被评为中等,因为除一项外,其他各项的偏倚风险、间接性、不一致性、不精确性和发表偏倚均很严重。因此,各结果的总体证据强度被确定为中等。这些结果支持对草酸钙结石和尿液化学成分异常患者启动药物治疗的有条件建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Urology
International Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
340
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信