Varying effect of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction according to CHA2DS2-VASc score.

IF 8.3 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Xiaodong Peng, Jiangtao Li, Nian Liu, Liu He, Xiaoxia Liu, Ning Zhou, Xin Du, Caihua Sang, Deyong Long, Jianzeng Dong, Changsheng Ma
{"title":"Varying effect of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction according to CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score.","authors":"Xiaodong Peng, Jiangtao Li, Nian Liu, Liu He, Xiaoxia Liu, Ning Zhou, Xin Du, Caihua Sang, Deyong Long, Jianzeng Dong, Changsheng Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.10.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of comorbidity burden on outcomes of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate how comorbidity burden influences the association between RFCA and cardiovascular outcomes in AF patients with HFpEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AF patients with HFpEF from the prospective China-AF cohort, recruited between August 2011 and December 2020, were categorized into 2 groups based CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score: low comorbidity burden (score ≤4) and high comorbidity burden (score >4). The associations between RFCA and cardiovascular outcomes and interaction effects of comorbidity burden on these associations were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1700 patients with median follow-up of 65.9 months, those in the low comorbidity burden group who received RFCA had a lower risk of composite events (cardiovascular death and ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack [TIA]) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.59] and all-cause death (adjusted HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.17-0.54) compared to those without RFCA. However, significant associations were not observed in the high comorbidity burden group. The differences between low and high comorbidity burden groups were significant, with interaction effects noted between comorbidity burden and RFCA for cardiovascular death (P<sub>interaction</sub> = 0.045) and ischemic stroke/TIA (P<sub>interaction</sub> = 0.010). RFCA was associated with a reduced risk of AF recurrence in both comorbidity burden groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RFCA for AF is associated with reduced AF recurrence and improved cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFpEF. However, these benefits may be limited for patients with a CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score >4 (high comorbidity burden).</p>","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.10.029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The impact of comorbidity burden on outcomes of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains unclear.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate how comorbidity burden influences the association between RFCA and cardiovascular outcomes in AF patients with HFpEF.

Methods: AF patients with HFpEF from the prospective China-AF cohort, recruited between August 2011 and December 2020, were categorized into 2 groups based CHA2DS2-VASc score: low comorbidity burden (score ≤4) and high comorbidity burden (score >4). The associations between RFCA and cardiovascular outcomes and interaction effects of comorbidity burden on these associations were assessed.

Results: Among 1700 patients with median follow-up of 65.9 months, those in the low comorbidity burden group who received RFCA had a lower risk of composite events (cardiovascular death and ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack [TIA]) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.59] and all-cause death (adjusted HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.17-0.54) compared to those without RFCA. However, significant associations were not observed in the high comorbidity burden group. The differences between low and high comorbidity burden groups were significant, with interaction effects noted between comorbidity burden and RFCA for cardiovascular death (Pinteraction = 0.045) and ischemic stroke/TIA (Pinteraction = 0.010). RFCA was associated with a reduced risk of AF recurrence in both comorbidity burden groups.

Conclusion: RFCA for AF is associated with reduced AF recurrence and improved cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFpEF. However, these benefits may be limited for patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score >4 (high comorbidity burden).

根据 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分,心房颤动消融术对高房颤患者的不同效果。
背景:合并症负担对射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者房颤射频导管消融术(RFCA)疗效的影响仍不清楚:评估合并症负担如何影响射血分数保留型心衰房颤患者的 RFCA 与心血管预后之间的关系:根据CHA2DS2-VASc评分,将2011年8月至2020年12月期间招募的前瞻性中国-房颤队列中的房颤患者分为两组:低合并症负担组(评分≤4分)和高合并症负担组(评分>4分)。评估了RFCA与心血管预后之间的关联以及合并症负担对这些关联的交互影响:在中位随访时间为 65.9 个月的 1700 名患者中,与未接受 RFCA 治疗的患者相比,接受 RFCA 治疗的低并发症负担组患者发生复合事件(心血管死亡和缺血性卒中/TIA)[调整后危险比 (aHR): 0.35, 95% CI, 0.21-0.59] 和全因死亡[aHR: 0.31, 95% CI, 0.17-0.54] 的风险较低。然而,在高合并症负担组中未观察到明显的相关性。低合并症负担组和高合并症负担组之间的差异显著,合并症负担和 RFCA 对心血管死亡(Pinteraction=0.045)和缺血性卒中/TIA(Pinteraction=0.010)有交互作用。在两个合并症负担组中,RFCA均与房颤复发风险降低有关:结论:RFCA 治疗房颤与降低房颤复发率和改善高频心衰患者的心血管预后有关。然而,对于 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分大于 4 分(高合并症负担)的患者,这些益处可能有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
4978
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信