Visual and anatomical evaluation of navigated subthreshold micropulse laser versus photodynamic therapy in managing chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the visual and anatomical results of navigated subthreshold micropulse laser (nSML) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR).

Methods: Patients who underwent either half-dose PDT or nSML for the management of chronic CSCR were included in this study. Comprehensive ophthalmic examination, fundus autofluorescence, and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were performed at baseline and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up visits after nSML or PDT. Fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography were performed only at baseline. Main outcome measures were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), subretinal fluid (SRF), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and choroidal vascularization index (CVI) that were collected at baseline and at each follow-up visit for up to 6 months.

Results: Forty-two eyes of 42 patients (PDT group-20 eyes, nSML group-22 eyes) affected by chronic CSCR were enrolled. At 6-month follow-up, no significant differences were observed between the nSML group compared to the PDT group in BCVA (0.10 [0.00; 0.20]) and 0.10 [0.10; 0.10], respectively, p=0.69, and between some OCT parameters, namely CMT and CVI. SFCT was significantly reduced in the PDT group more than in the nSML group (p=0.01). Twelve eyes (60%) in the PDT group had complete resolution of the SRF at 6 months compared to 8 eyes (36.4%) in the nSML group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.14).

Conclusion: Results from patients treated with PDT and nSML showed that, at 6 months, no significant differences except for choroidal thickness. nSML is less invasive than PDT and can be used as an effective alternative to PDT.

Key messages: WHAT IS KNOWN : Treating chronic CSCR is a therapeutic conundrum for clinicians because of a lack of definitive consensus over remediation options, two of which are photodynamic therapy (PDT) and navigated subthreshold micropulse laser (nSML) therapy.

This study shows: Results from patients treated with PDT and nSML showed no significant differences except for choroidal thickness. Even though patients treated with PDT recovered more quickly, retreatment was necessary due to fluid recollection. Although patients treated with nSML also needed retreatment, nSML is less invasive than PDT and can be used as an effective alternative to PDT.