Effect of Fresnel prism in small-angle esotropia (≤ 20 prism diopters) with fixation preference.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Hye Jun Joo, Seong-Joon Kim
{"title":"Effect of Fresnel prism in small-angle esotropia (≤ 20 prism diopters) with fixation preference.","authors":"Hye Jun Joo, Seong-Joon Kim","doi":"10.1007/s00417-024-06662-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to investigate the effects of Fresnel prism treatment for small-angle esotropia (≤ 20 prism diopters [PD]) with fixation preference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 32 patients with remaining esotropia ≤ 20 PD measured using the simultaneous prism and cover test (SPCT) after full refractive error correction. Fresnel prism was applied to make patients orthotropic with glasses. Treatment was discontinued if remaining esotropia ≤ 4 PD was sustained during two consecutive follow-ups (2-month intervals) or if the angle continued to increase with prism adaptation. Patients were divided into treatment success and failure groups. Treatment success was defined by motor and visual acuity (VA) aspects. Criteria for motor success was residual esotropia ≤ 8 PD in patients with initial esotropia > 8 PD and a 30% decrease of esotropia in those with initial esotropia ≤ 8 PD. VA success was improvement of > 0.2 logMAR in the non-dominant eye.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial esodeviation angle was 6.92 ± 4.66 PD at distance and 10.53 ± 5.58 at near. The logMAR VA was 0.10 ± 0.13 and 0.26 ± 0.20 in the dominant and non-dominant eye, respectively. Among the 32 patients, 14 showed motor success. Among 26 patients whose VA could be measured, 15 showed VA success. Factors influencing motor success were a small amount of maximum prescribed Fresnel prism, less frequent need for Fresnel prism adaptation, and high percentage of achieving orthotropia with Fresnel prism treatment. VA success was influenced by low frequency of anisometropia and the small amount of maximum prescribed Fresnel prism.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fresnel prism could be a non-invasive treatment option for some patients with small-angle esotropia with fixation preference.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>What is known The optimal approach for addressing small-angle esotropia is a topic of debate. Not much research has been conducted on Fresnel prism treatment in patients with small-angle esotropia. What is new Motor success and visual acuity improvement were observed in some patients undergoing Fresnel prism treatment. Factors contributing to motor success were the small maximum angle of esodeviation, the less frequent necessity for Fresnel prism adaptation, and the achievement of orthotropia during Fresnel prism treatment. Visual acuity improvement was hindered by the presence of anisometropia and the large maximum prescribed amount of Fresnel prism. Fresnel prism treatment can be used as a treatment option for some patients with small-angle esotropia with fixation preference.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"857-865"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06662-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the effects of Fresnel prism treatment for small-angle esotropia (≤ 20 prism diopters [PD]) with fixation preference.

Methods: We included 32 patients with remaining esotropia ≤ 20 PD measured using the simultaneous prism and cover test (SPCT) after full refractive error correction. Fresnel prism was applied to make patients orthotropic with glasses. Treatment was discontinued if remaining esotropia ≤ 4 PD was sustained during two consecutive follow-ups (2-month intervals) or if the angle continued to increase with prism adaptation. Patients were divided into treatment success and failure groups. Treatment success was defined by motor and visual acuity (VA) aspects. Criteria for motor success was residual esotropia ≤ 8 PD in patients with initial esotropia > 8 PD and a 30% decrease of esotropia in those with initial esotropia ≤ 8 PD. VA success was improvement of > 0.2 logMAR in the non-dominant eye.

Results: The initial esodeviation angle was 6.92 ± 4.66 PD at distance and 10.53 ± 5.58 at near. The logMAR VA was 0.10 ± 0.13 and 0.26 ± 0.20 in the dominant and non-dominant eye, respectively. Among the 32 patients, 14 showed motor success. Among 26 patients whose VA could be measured, 15 showed VA success. Factors influencing motor success were a small amount of maximum prescribed Fresnel prism, less frequent need for Fresnel prism adaptation, and high percentage of achieving orthotropia with Fresnel prism treatment. VA success was influenced by low frequency of anisometropia and the small amount of maximum prescribed Fresnel prism.

Conclusion: Fresnel prism could be a non-invasive treatment option for some patients with small-angle esotropia with fixation preference.

Key messages: What is known The optimal approach for addressing small-angle esotropia is a topic of debate. Not much research has been conducted on Fresnel prism treatment in patients with small-angle esotropia. What is new Motor success and visual acuity improvement were observed in some patients undergoing Fresnel prism treatment. Factors contributing to motor success were the small maximum angle of esodeviation, the less frequent necessity for Fresnel prism adaptation, and the achievement of orthotropia during Fresnel prism treatment. Visual acuity improvement was hindered by the presence of anisometropia and the large maximum prescribed amount of Fresnel prism. Fresnel prism treatment can be used as a treatment option for some patients with small-angle esotropia with fixation preference.

菲涅尔棱镜对小角度内斜视(≤ 20 棱镜斜度)和固定偏好的影响。
目的:我们的目的是研究菲涅尔棱镜治疗小角度内斜(≤20棱镜屈光度[PD])的效果与固定偏好:我们纳入了32名在完全屈光不正矫正后使用同时棱镜和遮盖试验(SPCT)测量的剩余内斜≤20 PD的患者。使用菲涅尔棱镜使患者戴上正视眼镜。如果在连续两次随访(间隔两个月)中,剩余内斜≤ 4 PD,或棱镜适应后角度继续增大,则停止治疗。患者被分为治疗成功组和治疗失败组。治疗成功的标准是运动和视力(VA)。运动成功的标准是初始内斜> 8 PD的患者残余内斜≤ 8 PD,初始内斜≤ 8 PD的患者内斜减少30%。非优势眼的视力成功改善> 0.2 logMAR:初始内斜远视角为 6.92 ± 4.66 PD,近视角为 10.53 ± 5.58。优势眼和非优势眼的 VA 对数分别为 0.10 ± 0.13 和 0.26 ± 0.20。在 32 名患者中,有 14 人运动成功。在可以测量视力的 26 名患者中,15 人的视力获得了成功。影响运动成功的因素包括菲涅尔棱镜的最大处方量小、菲涅尔棱镜适应的需求较少以及菲涅尔棱镜治疗达到正位的比例高。VA的成功率受异视发生率低和菲涅尔棱镜最大处方量少的影响:结论:菲涅尔棱镜对一些有固定偏好的小角度内斜患者来说是一种非侵入性治疗方法:已知信息 解决小角度内斜的最佳方法是一个争论不休的话题。有关菲涅尔棱镜治疗小角度内斜患者的研究不多。新发现 在一些接受菲涅尔棱镜治疗的患者中观察到了运动成功和视力改善。运动成功的因素包括:最大内斜角度小、较少需要菲涅尔棱镜适应以及在菲涅尔棱镜治疗过程中实现了正位。视力的提高则因存在内斜和菲涅尔棱镜的最大规定量过大而受到阻碍。菲涅尔棱镜治疗可作为一些有固定偏好的小角度内斜患者的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
398
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信