Predictive value of geriatric nutritional risk index in cardiac and cerebrovascular events after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1399908
YuPei Zou, Jiarong Wang, Jichun Zhao, Yukui Ma, Bin Huang, Ding Yuan, Yang Liu, Maonan Han, Huatian Gan, Yi Yang
{"title":"Predictive value of geriatric nutritional risk index in cardiac and cerebrovascular events after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.","authors":"YuPei Zou, Jiarong Wang, Jichun Zhao, Yukui Ma, Bin Huang, Ding Yuan, Yang Liu, Maonan Han, Huatian Gan, Yi Yang","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1399908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of malnutrition assessed by the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in the elderly patients after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of elderly patients who underwent EVAR in a tertiary hospital. Malnutrition status was assessed by the GNRI. The primary outcome was MACCE. The predictive ability of the GNRI was compared with both the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) and the modified Frailty Index (mFI) using Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 453 patients underwent EVAR November 2015 and January 2020 was retrospectively analyzed, equally divided into three (low/medium/high) groups according to GNRI values which ranked from low to high. Five (1.10%) patients were lost in follow-up after surgery, and the median length of follow-up was 28.00 (15.00-47.00) months. The high GNRI values reduced length of hospital stay following EVAR in comparison to patients in low GNRI values group (β 9.67, 95% CI 4.01-23.32, <i>p</i> = 0.0113; adjusted β -1.96, 95% CI -3.88, -0.05, <i>p</i> = 0.0454). GNRI status was associated with a significantly increased risk of long-term mortality after EVAR (Medium GNRI, unadjusted HR 0.40, 95%CI 0.23-0.70, <i>p</i> = 0.0014; adjusted HR 0.47, 95%CI 0.26-0.84, <i>p</i> = 0.0107; high GNRI, 0.27 95%CI 0.14-0.55; <i>p</i> = 0.0003; adjusted HR 0.32 95%CI 0.15-0.68, <i>p</i> = 0.0029). Both medium and high GNRI values were linked to significantly reduced risks of MACCE compared to low GNRI score patients (Medium GNRI, unadjusted HR 0.34, 95%CI 0.13-0.88, <i>p</i> = 0.00265; adjusted HR 0.37, 95%CI 0.14-0.96, <i>p</i> = 0.0408; High GNRI, 0.26 95%CI 0.09-0.78; <i>p</i> = 0.0168; adjusted HR 0.21 95%CI 0.06-0.73, <i>p</i> = 0.0029). Compared with the RCRI and mFI, the GNRI had better discrimination in predicting long-term MACCE. An area under the curve (AUC) for GNRI mFI, and RCRI is 0.707, 0.614 and 0.588, respectively. (Z statistic, GNRI vs. mFI, <i>p</i> = 0.0475; GNRI vs. RCRI, <i>p</i> = 0.0017).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Malnutrition assessed by the GNRI may serve as a useful predictor of long-term MACCE in elderly patients after EVAR, with preferable discrimination abilities compared with both RCRI and mFI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1399908","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of malnutrition assessed by the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in the elderly patients after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of elderly patients who underwent EVAR in a tertiary hospital. Malnutrition status was assessed by the GNRI. The primary outcome was MACCE. The predictive ability of the GNRI was compared with both the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) and the modified Frailty Index (mFI) using Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Result: A total of 453 patients underwent EVAR November 2015 and January 2020 was retrospectively analyzed, equally divided into three (low/medium/high) groups according to GNRI values which ranked from low to high. Five (1.10%) patients were lost in follow-up after surgery, and the median length of follow-up was 28.00 (15.00-47.00) months. The high GNRI values reduced length of hospital stay following EVAR in comparison to patients in low GNRI values group (β 9.67, 95% CI 4.01-23.32, p = 0.0113; adjusted β -1.96, 95% CI -3.88, -0.05, p = 0.0454). GNRI status was associated with a significantly increased risk of long-term mortality after EVAR (Medium GNRI, unadjusted HR 0.40, 95%CI 0.23-0.70, p = 0.0014; adjusted HR 0.47, 95%CI 0.26-0.84, p = 0.0107; high GNRI, 0.27 95%CI 0.14-0.55; p = 0.0003; adjusted HR 0.32 95%CI 0.15-0.68, p = 0.0029). Both medium and high GNRI values were linked to significantly reduced risks of MACCE compared to low GNRI score patients (Medium GNRI, unadjusted HR 0.34, 95%CI 0.13-0.88, p = 0.00265; adjusted HR 0.37, 95%CI 0.14-0.96, p = 0.0408; High GNRI, 0.26 95%CI 0.09-0.78; p = 0.0168; adjusted HR 0.21 95%CI 0.06-0.73, p = 0.0029). Compared with the RCRI and mFI, the GNRI had better discrimination in predicting long-term MACCE. An area under the curve (AUC) for GNRI mFI, and RCRI is 0.707, 0.614 and 0.588, respectively. (Z statistic, GNRI vs. mFI, p = 0.0475; GNRI vs. RCRI, p = 0.0017).

Conclusion: Malnutrition assessed by the GNRI may serve as a useful predictor of long-term MACCE in elderly patients after EVAR, with preferable discrimination abilities compared with both RCRI and mFI.

老年营养风险指数对血管内主动脉瘤修补术后心脑血管事件的预测价值。
目的评估用老年营养风险指数(GNRI)评估的营养不良对血管内主动脉瘤修补术(EVAR)后老年患者主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)的影响:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是在一家三级医院接受EVAR手术的老年患者。营养状况由 GNRI 评估。主要结果是MACCE。使用接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)比较了 GNRI 与修订版心脏风险指数(RCRI)和改良版虚弱指数(mFI)的预测能力:回顾性分析了2015年11月至2020年1月接受EVAR手术的453例患者,根据GNRI值从低到高平均分为三组(低/中/高)。术后有五名(1.10%)患者失去随访,中位随访时间为 28.00(15.00-47.00)个月。与低 GNRI 值组患者相比,高 GNRI 值减少了 EVAR 术后住院时间(β 9.67,95% CI 4.01-23.32,p = 0.0113;调整后 β -1.96,95% CI -3.88,-0.05,p = 0.0454)。GNRI 状态与 EVAR 后长期死亡风险的显著增加有关(中等 GNRI,未调整 HR 0.40,95%CI 0.23-0.70,p = 0.0014;调整 HR 0.47,95%CI 0.26-0.84,p = 0.0107;高 GNRI,0.27 95%CI 0.14-0.55;p = 0.0003;调整 HR 0.32 95%CI 0.15-0.68,p = 0.0029)。与 GNRI 低分患者相比,GNRI 中值和高值患者的 MACCE 风险均显著降低(GNRI 中值,未调整 HR 0.34,95%CI 0.13-0.88,p = 0.00265;调整 HR 0.37,95%CI 0.14-0.96,p = 0.0408;GNRI 高值,0.26 95%CI 0.09-0.78;p = 0.0168;调整 HR 0.21 95%CI 0.06-0.73,p = 0.0029)。与 RCRI 和 mFI 相比,GNRI 在预测长期 MACCE 方面具有更好的分辨能力。GNRI mFI 和 RCRI 的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.707、0.614 和 0.588。(Z统计量,GNRI vs. mFI,p = 0.0475;GNRI vs. RCRI,p = 0.0017):结论:通过 GNRI 评估的营养不良情况可作为 EVAR 术后老年患者长期 MACCE 的有效预测指标,与 RCRI 和 mFI 相比,其判别能力更佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信