{"title":"Long term safety of controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation prior to chemotherapy treatment in breast cancer patients.","authors":"Moran Shapira, Tal Sella, Myriam Safrai, Evyatar Villain, Dror Lifshitz, Raoul Orvieto, Einav Gal-Yam, Dror Meirow","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the long-term safety of controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation prior to breast cancer chemotherapy treatment DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort SUBJECTS: 213 women aged 18-43 years with newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer treated with systemic chemotherapy during 2015-2019. Of those, 74 underwent controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation recipients and 141 did not (controls).</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Invasive disease-free survival, calculated from the time of surgery to the time of detection of breast cancer recurrence or death, whichever came first.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At diagnosis, fertility preservation recipients were significantly younger than controls (32.7 vs 38.5 years), were less likely to be partnered (44.4% vs 90.1%) or parous (38.9% vs 95%) and were more likely to harbor a BRCA germline mutation (36.5% vs 14.2%). Disease characteristics and treatment modalities were comparable between groups, apart from tumor staging, with maximal tumor diameter being over 5 cm in 22.2% of fertility preservation recipients as opposed to 5.7% of controls (P<0.05). Mean follow-up was 60.9 and 65.4 months for fertility preservation recipients and controls, respectively. 5-year-invasive disease free survival was 80% for fertility preservation recipients and 86% for controls (p=0.20). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for statistically significant covariates, invasive disease free survival remained similar between the groups (Hazards Ratio (HR), 0.86, 95CI 0.4-1.87, p = 0.71). Invasive disease free survival rates were not statistically different in clinically relevant subgroups including patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 1.57, CI 95 0.62-3.99, p=0.34), and those co-treated with tamoxifen during stimulation due to an ER-positive disease (HR 1.66, 95CI 0.67-3.49, p=0.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fertility preservation with controlled ovarian stimulation for patients with breast cancer was not found to impair long-term oncologic outcomes, including in emerging clinically relevant subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the long-term safety of controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation prior to breast cancer chemotherapy treatment DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort SUBJECTS: 213 women aged 18-43 years with newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer treated with systemic chemotherapy during 2015-2019. Of those, 74 underwent controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation recipients and 141 did not (controls).
Exposure: Controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Invasive disease-free survival, calculated from the time of surgery to the time of detection of breast cancer recurrence or death, whichever came first.
Results: At diagnosis, fertility preservation recipients were significantly younger than controls (32.7 vs 38.5 years), were less likely to be partnered (44.4% vs 90.1%) or parous (38.9% vs 95%) and were more likely to harbor a BRCA germline mutation (36.5% vs 14.2%). Disease characteristics and treatment modalities were comparable between groups, apart from tumor staging, with maximal tumor diameter being over 5 cm in 22.2% of fertility preservation recipients as opposed to 5.7% of controls (P<0.05). Mean follow-up was 60.9 and 65.4 months for fertility preservation recipients and controls, respectively. 5-year-invasive disease free survival was 80% for fertility preservation recipients and 86% for controls (p=0.20). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for statistically significant covariates, invasive disease free survival remained similar between the groups (Hazards Ratio (HR), 0.86, 95CI 0.4-1.87, p = 0.71). Invasive disease free survival rates were not statistically different in clinically relevant subgroups including patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 1.57, CI 95 0.62-3.99, p=0.34), and those co-treated with tamoxifen during stimulation due to an ER-positive disease (HR 1.66, 95CI 0.67-3.49, p=0.23).
Conclusions: Fertility preservation with controlled ovarian stimulation for patients with breast cancer was not found to impair long-term oncologic outcomes, including in emerging clinically relevant subgroups.
期刊介绍:
Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.