Assessing inter-ocular fixational eye movements throughout the lifespan.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-12 DOI:10.1007/s00221-024-06936-2
Sophie C Yue, Gokce B Cakir, Aasef Shaikh, Fatema F Ghasia
{"title":"Assessing inter-ocular fixational eye movements throughout the lifespan.","authors":"Sophie C Yue, Gokce B Cakir, Aasef Shaikh, Fatema F Ghasia","doi":"10.1007/s00221-024-06936-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to assess fixational eye movements (FEMs) obtained under binocular and monocular viewing in normal individuals across different age groups. We recruited 68 healthy participants divided into Group 1 (children, 3-9 years, n = 20), Group 2 (adolescents, 10-19 years, n = 26), and Group 3 (adults, 20-73 years, n = 22). FEMs were collected using a high-resolution video-based tracker under 3 viewing conditions: binocular viewing (BV), monocular viewing right eye (MV_RE), and monocular viewing left eye (MV_LE). We quantified fixation stability, the frequency, amplitude, and disconjugacy of fixational saccades, and inter-saccadic drift velocity in BV, MV_RE, and MV_LE. We also computed inter-ocular fixation stability under binocular viewing and monocular viewing in the 3 groups. Fixation instability (FI) and fixational saccade amplitudes were higher in Group 1 than in Group 3 whereas inter-saccadic drifts were increased in Group 3. Vergence stability was greater in binocular viewing than in monocular viewing likely due to binocular summation in all groups. However, the fixational saccade amplitude and drift velocity of the right and left eye did not significantly differ across different viewing conditions within each group. Interestingly, the inter-ocular fixation stability ratio and vergence stability showed no significant differences between the groups. In conclusion, FEMs differ across age groups but inter-ocular FEMs are immune to the effects of age and can be a valuable parameter while evaluating FEM abnormalities in diseases like amblyopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"2749-2763"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06936-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to assess fixational eye movements (FEMs) obtained under binocular and monocular viewing in normal individuals across different age groups. We recruited 68 healthy participants divided into Group 1 (children, 3-9 years, n = 20), Group 2 (adolescents, 10-19 years, n = 26), and Group 3 (adults, 20-73 years, n = 22). FEMs were collected using a high-resolution video-based tracker under 3 viewing conditions: binocular viewing (BV), monocular viewing right eye (MV_RE), and monocular viewing left eye (MV_LE). We quantified fixation stability, the frequency, amplitude, and disconjugacy of fixational saccades, and inter-saccadic drift velocity in BV, MV_RE, and MV_LE. We also computed inter-ocular fixation stability under binocular viewing and monocular viewing in the 3 groups. Fixation instability (FI) and fixational saccade amplitudes were higher in Group 1 than in Group 3 whereas inter-saccadic drifts were increased in Group 3. Vergence stability was greater in binocular viewing than in monocular viewing likely due to binocular summation in all groups. However, the fixational saccade amplitude and drift velocity of the right and left eye did not significantly differ across different viewing conditions within each group. Interestingly, the inter-ocular fixation stability ratio and vergence stability showed no significant differences between the groups. In conclusion, FEMs differ across age groups but inter-ocular FEMs are immune to the effects of age and can be a valuable parameter while evaluating FEM abnormalities in diseases like amblyopia.

评估人一生中的眼球定点运动。
本研究旨在评估不同年龄组正常人在双目和单目注视下获得的固定眼球运动(FEM)。我们招募了 68 名健康参与者,分为第 1 组(儿童,3-9 岁,n = 20)、第 2 组(青少年,10-19 岁,n = 26)和第 3 组(成人,20-73 岁,n = 22)。在 3 种观察条件下,使用基于高分辨率视频的跟踪器收集 FEM:双目观察 (BV)、右眼单目观察 (MV_RE) 和左眼单目观察 (MV_LE)。我们对 BV、MV_RE 和 MV_LE 条件下的固定稳定性、固定性囊回的频率、振幅和不共轭性以及囊回间漂移速度进行了量化。我们还计算了 3 组患者在双眼注视和单眼注视下的眼间定点稳定性。第 1 组的固定不稳定性(FI)和固定囊回振幅高于第 3 组,而第 3 组的accadic间漂移增加。双目注视时的注视稳定性高于单目注视时,这可能是由于所有组的双目总和作用。然而,左右眼的定点囊回幅度和漂移速度在各组不同的观察条件下并无显著差异。有趣的是,各组之间的眼间固定稳定性比率和辐辏稳定性也没有显著差异。总之,不同年龄组的眼球固定稳定性比存在差异,但眼球间固定稳定性比不受年龄的影响,在评估弱视等疾病的眼球固定稳定性比异常时是一个有价值的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信