Experience of observation skill workshop intervention for ophthalmologists in fellowship training.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2024-10-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.148008.2
Snigdha Snigdha, Avinash Pathengay, Anamika Patel, Shefali Pandey, Shobha Mocherla, Ruby Kala Prakasam
{"title":"Experience of observation skill workshop intervention for ophthalmologists in fellowship training.","authors":"Snigdha Snigdha, Avinash Pathengay, Anamika Patel, Shefali Pandey, Shobha Mocherla, Ruby Kala Prakasam","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.148008.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To gauge the impact of an interventional workshop conducted to measure the observation skills of 34 postgraduates during induction into an ophthalmology fellowship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A seven-hour workshop was conducted with the ophthalmology trainees. Trainees from the 2022 batch of ophthalmology fellowships (21 females and 13 males) were included in the study. The pre-workshop assessment comprised two non-clinical images to spot the difference and five clinical images from various subspecialties of ophthalmology. This was followed by workshop and Post workshop assessment. The pre- and post-observation grades of participants were then compared by masked ophthalmologists. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare scores at two time points, with a p-value < 0.05 for statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical analysis revealed that the observation skill score was significantly higher after the workshop intervention (M <sub>d</sub> = 4.00, n = 34) compared to the pre-workshop score (M <sub>d</sub> = 1.85, n = 34), p-value = 0.000.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Workshops on specific/selected foundational skills, such as observation skills and communication skills, must be integrated into the curricula of basic medical degree and specialty medicine to equip medical professionals with attentive observation and deep learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"13 ","pages":"524"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.148008.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To gauge the impact of an interventional workshop conducted to measure the observation skills of 34 postgraduates during induction into an ophthalmology fellowship.

Methods: A seven-hour workshop was conducted with the ophthalmology trainees. Trainees from the 2022 batch of ophthalmology fellowships (21 females and 13 males) were included in the study. The pre-workshop assessment comprised two non-clinical images to spot the difference and five clinical images from various subspecialties of ophthalmology. This was followed by workshop and Post workshop assessment. The pre- and post-observation grades of participants were then compared by masked ophthalmologists. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare scores at two time points, with a p-value < 0.05 for statistical significance.

Results: Statistical analysis revealed that the observation skill score was significantly higher after the workshop intervention (M d = 4.00, n = 34) compared to the pre-workshop score (M d = 1.85, n = 34), p-value = 0.000.

Conclusions: Workshops on specific/selected foundational skills, such as observation skills and communication skills, must be integrated into the curricula of basic medical degree and specialty medicine to equip medical professionals with attentive observation and deep learning.

为接受研究培训的眼科医生举办观察技能讲习班的经验。
背景:目的:评估在眼科研究员入职培训期间为测量34名研究生的观察技能而举办的干预研讨会的影响:在眼科研究员入职培训期间,为测量 34 名研究生的观察技能而举办了一个干预性研讨会,目的是评估该研讨会的影响:方法:为眼科学员举办了一个七小时的工作坊。研究对象包括来自 2022 年眼科研究金学员(21 名女性和 13 名男性)。研修班前的评估包括两张非临床图片以发现差异,以及五张来自眼科各亚专科的临床图片。随后是工作坊和工作坊后评估。然后,由蒙面眼科医生对学员观察前后的成绩进行比较。采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较两个时间点的分数,以 P 值小于 0.05 为具有统计学意义:统计分析显示,讲习班干预后的观察技能得分(M d = 4.00,n = 34)明显高于讲习班前的得分(M d = 1.85,n = 34),P 值 = 0.000:必须在基础医学学位和专科医学的课程中纳入有关特定/选定基础技能(如观察技能和沟通技能)的讲习班,以培养医学专业人员的专注观察和深度学习能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信