Michal Nisnboym, Chaim T Sneiderman, Ambika P Jaswal, Zujian Xiong, Sarah R Vincze, ReidAnn E Sever, Han Zou, Stephen C Frederico, Sameer Agnihotri, Baoli Hu, Jan Drappatz, Ian F Pollack, Gary Kohanbash, Itay Raphael
{"title":"Assessment of anti-CD69 antibody therapy alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 in murine GBM.","authors":"Michal Nisnboym, Chaim T Sneiderman, Ambika P Jaswal, Zujian Xiong, Sarah R Vincze, ReidAnn E Sever, Han Zou, Stephen C Frederico, Sameer Agnihotri, Baoli Hu, Jan Drappatz, Ian F Pollack, Gary Kohanbash, Itay Raphael","doi":"10.1080/1744666X.2024.2412770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive cancer with limited treatment options. Immunotherapy targeting CD69, an early activation marker on T cells, has shown promise in preclinical models of non-CNS malignancies. This study investigates anti-CD69 therapy alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 in a preclinical GBM model.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>CD69 expression in GBM patient tissues was analyzed using the TCGA database. Therapeutic efficacy of anti-CD69 was tested in a murine GBM model with different regimens. Immune cell populations in the tumor microenvironment (TME) were assessed by flow cytometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increased CD69 expression was observed in GBM patients compared to normal brain tissue and was associated with worse prognosis. Anti-CD69 treatment reduced percentages of CD69<sup>+</sup> immune cells but did not improve survival in GBM-bearing mice. Increased PD-1 expression on NK cells was observed following anti-CD69 treatment. Anti-CD69 treatment was not improved by the addition of anti-PD-1 in vivo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study evaluating anti-CD69 therapy in a preclinical GBM model. Despite promising preclinical data in other cancers, anti-CD69 monotherapy or combination therapy with anti-PD-1 did not improve survival in this GBM model.</p>","PeriodicalId":12175,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"239-247"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2024.2412770","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive cancer with limited treatment options. Immunotherapy targeting CD69, an early activation marker on T cells, has shown promise in preclinical models of non-CNS malignancies. This study investigates anti-CD69 therapy alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 in a preclinical GBM model.
Research design and methods: CD69 expression in GBM patient tissues was analyzed using the TCGA database. Therapeutic efficacy of anti-CD69 was tested in a murine GBM model with different regimens. Immune cell populations in the tumor microenvironment (TME) were assessed by flow cytometry.
Results: Increased CD69 expression was observed in GBM patients compared to normal brain tissue and was associated with worse prognosis. Anti-CD69 treatment reduced percentages of CD69+ immune cells but did not improve survival in GBM-bearing mice. Increased PD-1 expression on NK cells was observed following anti-CD69 treatment. Anti-CD69 treatment was not improved by the addition of anti-PD-1 in vivo.
Conclusions: This is the first study evaluating anti-CD69 therapy in a preclinical GBM model. Despite promising preclinical data in other cancers, anti-CD69 monotherapy or combination therapy with anti-PD-1 did not improve survival in this GBM model.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (ISSN 1744-666X) provides expert analysis and commentary regarding the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in clinical immunology. Members of the International Editorial Advisory Panel of Expert Review of Clinical Immunology are the forefront of their area of expertise. This panel works with our dedicated editorial team to identify the most important and topical review themes and the corresponding expert(s) most appropriate to provide commentary and analysis. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the finished reviews provide an essential contribution to decision-making in clinical immunology.
Articles focus on the following key areas:
• Therapeutic overviews of specific immunologic disorders highlighting optimal therapy and prospects for new medicines
• Performance and benefits of newly approved therapeutic agents
• New diagnostic approaches
• Screening and patient stratification
• Pharmacoeconomic studies
• New therapeutic indications for existing therapies
• Adverse effects, occurrence and reduction
• Prospects for medicines in late-stage trials approaching regulatory approval
• Novel treatment strategies
• Epidemiological studies
• Commentary and comparison of treatment guidelines
Topics include infection and immunity, inflammation, host defense mechanisms, congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, anaphylaxis and allergy, systemic immune diseases, organ-specific inflammatory diseases, transplantation immunology, endocrinology and diabetes, cancer immunology, neuroimmunology and hematological diseases.