Naturalistic substance use before/during MTurk research participation is associated with increased substance demand and craving.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Shahar Almog, Liana S E Hone, Chiara M Licata, Jillian M Rung, Meredith S Berry
{"title":"Naturalistic substance use before/during MTurk research participation is associated with increased substance demand and craving.","authors":"Shahar Almog, Liana S E Hone, Chiara M Licata, Jillian M Rung, Meredith S Berry","doi":"10.1037/pha0000743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although crowdsourcing platforms are widely used in substance-use research, it is unclear what percentage of participants use substances at the time of participation and how this might affect data quality, behavioral outcomes, or decision making. We conducted a secondary analysis of data collected on MTurk for a two-session, within-subject experiment recruiting individuals who regularly use alcohol, cannabis, cigarettes, or opioids. We analyzed 527 observations collected across two sessions (Session 1: <i>n</i> = 303, Session 2: <i>n</i> = 224) on measures of substance use before (within 3 hr)/during participation, data quality, demand in hypothetical purchase tasks, delay discounting, and craving. Substance use before/during participation was common (35.7%). Some participants reported substance use before/during both (25.4%) or only one (20.1%) of the sessions. Between-subject analyses of the first session data revealed that participants who used substances before/during participation did not differ on quality measures yet were slower to complete the survey. Controlling for individual differences in demographic variables and typical substance use, using a substance before/during participation was associated with increased hypothetical consumption of substances when the substance was free (demand intensity) and higher craving for substances, but not delay discounting. Substance use before/during MTurk participation among individuals who regularly use substances is prevalent and may impact outcome measures or standardization across sessions in repeated measures designs. Several implications have emerged, including statistically or experimentally controlling for substance use occurring before/during participation, which could improve the validity and rigor of online substance use research, and should be considered a part of best practices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000743","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although crowdsourcing platforms are widely used in substance-use research, it is unclear what percentage of participants use substances at the time of participation and how this might affect data quality, behavioral outcomes, or decision making. We conducted a secondary analysis of data collected on MTurk for a two-session, within-subject experiment recruiting individuals who regularly use alcohol, cannabis, cigarettes, or opioids. We analyzed 527 observations collected across two sessions (Session 1: n = 303, Session 2: n = 224) on measures of substance use before (within 3 hr)/during participation, data quality, demand in hypothetical purchase tasks, delay discounting, and craving. Substance use before/during participation was common (35.7%). Some participants reported substance use before/during both (25.4%) or only one (20.1%) of the sessions. Between-subject analyses of the first session data revealed that participants who used substances before/during participation did not differ on quality measures yet were slower to complete the survey. Controlling for individual differences in demographic variables and typical substance use, using a substance before/during participation was associated with increased hypothetical consumption of substances when the substance was free (demand intensity) and higher craving for substances, but not delay discounting. Substance use before/during MTurk participation among individuals who regularly use substances is prevalent and may impact outcome measures or standardization across sessions in repeated measures designs. Several implications have emerged, including statistically or experimentally controlling for substance use occurring before/during participation, which could improve the validity and rigor of online substance use research, and should be considered a part of best practices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

在参与 MTurk 研究之前/期间自然使用药物与药物需求和渴求增加有关。
虽然众包平台被广泛应用于药物使用研究,但目前还不清楚参与者中有多大比例的人在参与研究时使用药物,也不清楚这会对数据质量、行为结果或决策产生怎样的影响。我们对 MTurk 上收集的数据进行了二次分析,这些数据是在一个招募经常使用酒精、大麻、香烟或阿片类药物的人进行的两期受试者内实验中收集的。我们分析了两节课(第 1 节:n = 303,第 2 节:n = 224)中收集的 527 个观察结果,这些观察结果涉及参与前(3 小时内)/参与期间的药物使用、数据质量、假设购买任务中的需求、延迟折现和渴求。参与前/参与期间使用药物的情况很普遍(35.7%)。一些受试者报告在两次(25.4%)或仅一次(20.1%)参与前/参与期间使用过药物。对第一次疗程数据进行的受试者间分析表明,在参与前/参与期间使用过药物的参与者在质量测量上没有差异,但完成调查的速度较慢。在控制了人口统计学变量和典型药物使用方面的个体差异后,参与前/参与期间使用药物与药物免费时的假设消费增加(需求强度)和对药物的渴求增加有关,但与延迟折扣无关。经常使用药物的人在参与 MTurk 之前/期间使用药物的情况很普遍,这可能会影响结果测量或重复测量设计中各阶段的标准化。这些影响包括在统计或实验上控制参与前/参与期间的药物使用,这可以提高在线药物使用研究的有效性和严谨性,并应被视为最佳实践的一部分。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes advances in translational and interdisciplinary research on psychopharmacology, broadly defined, and/or substance abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信