Beyond trauma: a review of content and linguistic characteristics of nontrauma narratives in posttraumatic stress disorder.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Aubrey A Knoff, Jennifer J Vasterling, Mieke Verfaellie
{"title":"Beyond trauma: a review of content and linguistic characteristics of nontrauma narratives in posttraumatic stress disorder.","authors":"Aubrey A Knoff, Jennifer J Vasterling, Mieke Verfaellie","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2024.2407733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Using narratives to reflect on experiences, emotions, and thoughts is associated with better health, enhanced mood, and improved symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Prior research examining narrative characteristics thought to reflect cognitive styles associated with PTSD has focused on trauma narratives, but the characteristics of nontrauma narratives in relation to PTSD are not fully understood.<b>Objective:</b> We reviewed the PTSD literature examining linguistic characteristics of nontrauma narratives, focusing on affective content, personal pronouns, and cognitive processing words.<b>Method:</b> We searched online databases for both laboratory and social media studies examining these characteristics of nontrauma narratives in relation to PTSD diagnostic status and/or PTSD symptom severity.<b>Results:</b> Following SWiM guidelines [Campbell et al., 2020. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: Reporting guideline. <i>British Medical Journal</i>, <i>368</i>, l6890], there was moderate evidence for differential use of emotion words in nontrauma narratives in relation to PTSD symptom cluster severity. More severe avoidance/numbing symptoms were associated with greater use of negative emotion words and less use of positive emotion words. Results were mixed for other linguistic elements reviewed.<b>Conclusions:</b> Differential use of emotional language in trauma narratives generalises to nontrauma narratives in individuals with PTSD. Additional research is needed to elucidate the use of personal pronouns and cognitive processing words in nontrauma narratives.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11488194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2024.2407733","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Using narratives to reflect on experiences, emotions, and thoughts is associated with better health, enhanced mood, and improved symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Prior research examining narrative characteristics thought to reflect cognitive styles associated with PTSD has focused on trauma narratives, but the characteristics of nontrauma narratives in relation to PTSD are not fully understood.Objective: We reviewed the PTSD literature examining linguistic characteristics of nontrauma narratives, focusing on affective content, personal pronouns, and cognitive processing words.Method: We searched online databases for both laboratory and social media studies examining these characteristics of nontrauma narratives in relation to PTSD diagnostic status and/or PTSD symptom severity.Results: Following SWiM guidelines [Campbell et al., 2020. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: Reporting guideline. British Medical Journal, 368, l6890], there was moderate evidence for differential use of emotion words in nontrauma narratives in relation to PTSD symptom cluster severity. More severe avoidance/numbing symptoms were associated with greater use of negative emotion words and less use of positive emotion words. Results were mixed for other linguistic elements reviewed.Conclusions: Differential use of emotional language in trauma narratives generalises to nontrauma narratives in individuals with PTSD. Additional research is needed to elucidate the use of personal pronouns and cognitive processing words in nontrauma narratives.

超越创伤:创伤后应激障碍非创伤叙事的内容和语言特点回顾。
背景:使用叙述来反思经历、情绪和想法与改善健康、提高情绪和改善创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状有关。之前对被认为反映与创伤后应激障碍相关的认知方式的叙述特征的研究主要集中在创伤叙述上,但对与创伤后应激障碍相关的非创伤叙述的特征还不完全了解:我们回顾了研究非创伤叙事语言特点的创伤后应激障碍文献,重点关注情感内容、人称代词和认知加工词:我们在网上数据库中搜索了实验室研究和社交媒体研究,这些研究考察了非创伤叙事的这些特征与创伤后应激障碍诊断状态和/或创伤后应激障碍症状严重程度的关系:根据 SWiM 指南[坎贝尔等人,2020 年。系统综述中的无荟萃分析(SWiM)综合:报告指南。英国医学杂志》(British Medical Journal),368,l6890],有中等程度的证据表明,非创伤叙事中情绪词的不同使用与创伤后应激障碍症状群的严重程度有关。更严重的回避/麻木症状与更多地使用消极情绪词和较少使用积极情绪词有关。对其他语言要素的研究结果不一:结论:创伤后应激障碍患者在创伤叙事中情感语言使用的差异会延伸到非创伤叙事中。需要进行更多的研究来阐明非创伤叙事中人称代词和认知加工词的使用情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信