Associations between sedentary types, sedentary patterns and cognitive ability in preschool children.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
European Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1007/s00431-024-05813-y
Dan Li, Michael Chia, Seow Ting Low, Terence Chua, Jiameng Ma, Hyunshik Kim, Lifang Zhang, Lili Tian, Xianxiong Li
{"title":"Associations between sedentary types, sedentary patterns and cognitive ability in preschool children.","authors":"Dan Li, Michael Chia, Seow Ting Low, Terence Chua, Jiameng Ma, Hyunshik Kim, Lifang Zhang, Lili Tian, Xianxiong Li","doi":"10.1007/s00431-024-05813-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The preschool years are a critical period for developing cognitive abilities such as reasoning, memorization, comprehension, quick thinking, and problem-solving. Sedentary behavior (SB) is known to be associated with cognitive development in preschool children. However, limited research has focused on how different types of SB (active, passive) and sedentary patterns (bouts, breaks) affect preschool children's cognitive abilities. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate: (1) the relationship between sedentary types and preschoolers' cognitive abilities; and (2) the relationship between sedentary patterns and preschoolers' cognitive abilities. Preschoolers aged 3 to 6 years (n = 353) were recruited from 5 kindergartens in Changsha, Hunan, China. Sedentary types were reported by parents, sedentary patterns were measured by preschoolers wearing an ActiGraph wGT3X-BT for seven consecutive days, and cognitive abilities were assessed using the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-IV). The relationships between variables were analyzed using multiple linear regression models. Non-screen-based active SB was associated with higher full-scale IQ and fluid reasoning index in boys and higher visual spatial index in girls. Screen-based active SB was negatively associated with overall cognitive ability. Passive SB potentially had a negative effect on overall cognitive ability, but screen-based passive SB was positively associated with higher fluid reasoning indices in girls. Preschoolers' cognitive ability was positively associated with sedentary breaks, but not with sedentary bouts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Not all types of SB are equal when examining optimal cognitive development in preschoolers. Frequent breaks from sedentary time were associated with better cognitive development. Encouraging more frequent breaks to interrupt prolonged SB may be a viable strategy for reducing sedentary time to promote optimal cognitive development. These findings should be further validated in larger prospective studies.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Sedentary behavior is not advantageous for cognitive development.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• Not all types of sedentary behavior are harmful. • Active sedentary behaviors are beneficial to overall cognitive development, but screen-based active sedentary behaviors may negatively impact some areas of cognitive performance. • Cognitive abilities in preschoolers are associated with sedentary breaks, but not with sedentary bouts.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"5351-5362"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05813-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The preschool years are a critical period for developing cognitive abilities such as reasoning, memorization, comprehension, quick thinking, and problem-solving. Sedentary behavior (SB) is known to be associated with cognitive development in preschool children. However, limited research has focused on how different types of SB (active, passive) and sedentary patterns (bouts, breaks) affect preschool children's cognitive abilities. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate: (1) the relationship between sedentary types and preschoolers' cognitive abilities; and (2) the relationship between sedentary patterns and preschoolers' cognitive abilities. Preschoolers aged 3 to 6 years (n = 353) were recruited from 5 kindergartens in Changsha, Hunan, China. Sedentary types were reported by parents, sedentary patterns were measured by preschoolers wearing an ActiGraph wGT3X-BT for seven consecutive days, and cognitive abilities were assessed using the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-IV). The relationships between variables were analyzed using multiple linear regression models. Non-screen-based active SB was associated with higher full-scale IQ and fluid reasoning index in boys and higher visual spatial index in girls. Screen-based active SB was negatively associated with overall cognitive ability. Passive SB potentially had a negative effect on overall cognitive ability, but screen-based passive SB was positively associated with higher fluid reasoning indices in girls. Preschoolers' cognitive ability was positively associated with sedentary breaks, but not with sedentary bouts.

Conclusions: Not all types of SB are equal when examining optimal cognitive development in preschoolers. Frequent breaks from sedentary time were associated with better cognitive development. Encouraging more frequent breaks to interrupt prolonged SB may be a viable strategy for reducing sedentary time to promote optimal cognitive development. These findings should be further validated in larger prospective studies.

What is known: • Sedentary behavior is not advantageous for cognitive development.

What is new: • Not all types of sedentary behavior are harmful. • Active sedentary behaviors are beneficial to overall cognitive development, but screen-based active sedentary behaviors may negatively impact some areas of cognitive performance. • Cognitive abilities in preschoolers are associated with sedentary breaks, but not with sedentary bouts.

学龄前儿童的久坐类型、久坐模式与认知能力之间的关系。
学龄前是发展推理、记忆、理解、快速思考和解决问题等认知能力的关键时期。众所周知,久坐行为(SB)与学龄前儿童的认知发展有关。然而,关于不同类型的久坐行为(主动、被动)和久坐模式(间歇、休息)如何影响学龄前儿童认知能力的研究却很有限。本横断面研究旨在探讨:(1)久坐类型与学龄前儿童认知能力之间的关系;(2)久坐模式与学龄前儿童认知能力之间的关系。研究人员从中国湖南长沙的 5 所幼儿园招募了 3 至 6 岁的学龄前儿童(n = 353)。久坐类型由家长报告,久坐模式由学龄前儿童佩戴 ActiGraph wGT3X-BT 连续七天进行测量,认知能力则使用韦氏学前和小学智能量表(WPPSI-IV)进行评估。变量之间的关系采用多元线性回归模型进行分析。非屏幕主动式课外活动与男孩较高的全面智商和流体推理指数以及女孩较高的视觉空间指数有关。基于屏幕的主动式 SB 与整体认知能力呈负相关。被动式 SB 对整体认知能力有潜在的负面影响,但基于屏幕的被动式 SB 与女孩较高的流体推理指数呈正相关。学龄前儿童的认知能力与久坐休息时间呈正相关,但与久坐片刻无关:结论:在研究学龄前儿童的最佳认知发展时,并非所有类型的久坐不动都是一样的。在研究学龄前儿童的最佳认知发展时,并非所有类型的久坐不动都是一样的。鼓励更频繁地休息以中断长时间的久坐不动可能是减少久坐时间以促进最佳认知发展的可行策略。这些发现应在更大规模的前瞻性研究中得到进一步验证:- 新发现:久坐不动不利于认知发展:- 新发现:并非所有类型的久坐行为都有害。- 积极的久坐行为有利于认知能力的整体发展,但基于屏幕的积极久坐行为可能会对认知能力的某些方面产生负面影响。- 学龄前儿童的认知能力与久坐休息时间有关,但与久坐时间段无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信