Impact of ticagrelor with or without aspirin on total and recurrent bleeding and ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention: A sub-study of the TWILIGHT trial.

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Usman Baber, Davide Cao, Timothy Collier, Samantha Sartori, George Dangas, Dominick J Angiolillo, Birgit Vogel, Vijay Kunadian, Carlo Briguori, David J Cohen, Dariusz Dudek, C Michael Gibson, Robert Gil, Kurt Huber, Upendra Kaul, Ran Kornowski, Mitchell W Krucoff, Shamir Mehta, David J Moliterno, E Magnus Ohman, Javier Escaned, Gennaro Sardella, Samin K Sharma, Richard Shlofmitz, Giora Weisz, Bernhard Witzenbichler, P Gabriel Steg, Stuart Pocock, Roxana Mehran
{"title":"Impact of ticagrelor with or without aspirin on total and recurrent bleeding and ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention: A sub-study of the TWILIGHT trial.","authors":"Usman Baber, Davide Cao, Timothy Collier, Samantha Sartori, George Dangas, Dominick J Angiolillo, Birgit Vogel, Vijay Kunadian, Carlo Briguori, David J Cohen, Dariusz Dudek, C Michael Gibson, Robert Gil, Kurt Huber, Upendra Kaul, Ran Kornowski, Mitchell W Krucoff, Shamir Mehta, David J Moliterno, E Magnus Ohman, Javier Escaned, Gennaro Sardella, Samin K Sharma, Richard Shlofmitz, Giora Weisz, Bernhard Witzenbichler, P Gabriel Steg, Stuart Pocock, Roxana Mehran","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In standard time-to-first event analysis, early aspirin discontinuation followed by ticagrelor monotherapy has been shown to reduce bleeding without increasing ischemic complications compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluated whether these treatment effects are preserved when recurrent events are considered.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In this TWILIGHT trial post hoc analysis, we assessed the effects of ticagrelor monotherapy on the total number of events that occurred over the 12-month follow-up among 7 119 high-risk patients randomized to aspirin or placebo in addition to ticagrelor at 3 months post-PCI if event-free and adherent to treatment. There were 391 patients with at least one Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding (primary endpoint). Of those, 28 (7.2%) had a recurrent event. The total number of BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding events were 148 in the ticagrelor monotherapy arm compared with 278 with ticagrelor plus aspirin arm (p < 0.001). Among 272 patients with at least one key secondary ischemic endpoint (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke), 37 (13.6%) sustained a recurrent event. Total ischemic events were similar (155 vs 159) in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among selected high-risk patients who underwent PCI and completed 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy followed by ticagrelor with or without aspirin, recurrent bleeding was less common than recurrent ischemic events over 12 months. Analysis of total events indicates that ticagrelor monotherapy continues to be more effective than ticagrelor plus aspirin in reducing bleeding without a signal of ischemic harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":11982,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae080","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: In standard time-to-first event analysis, early aspirin discontinuation followed by ticagrelor monotherapy has been shown to reduce bleeding without increasing ischemic complications compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluated whether these treatment effects are preserved when recurrent events are considered.

Methods and results: In this TWILIGHT trial post hoc analysis, we assessed the effects of ticagrelor monotherapy on the total number of events that occurred over the 12-month follow-up among 7 119 high-risk patients randomized to aspirin or placebo in addition to ticagrelor at 3 months post-PCI if event-free and adherent to treatment. There were 391 patients with at least one Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding (primary endpoint). Of those, 28 (7.2%) had a recurrent event. The total number of BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding events were 148 in the ticagrelor monotherapy arm compared with 278 with ticagrelor plus aspirin arm (p < 0.001). Among 272 patients with at least one key secondary ischemic endpoint (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke), 37 (13.6%) sustained a recurrent event. Total ischemic events were similar (155 vs 159) in the two groups.

Conclusions: Among selected high-risk patients who underwent PCI and completed 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy followed by ticagrelor with or without aspirin, recurrent bleeding was less common than recurrent ischemic events over 12 months. Analysis of total events indicates that ticagrelor monotherapy continues to be more effective than ticagrelor plus aspirin in reducing bleeding without a signal of ischemic harm.

替卡格雷联合或不联合阿司匹林对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后总出血、复发性出血和缺血性事件的影响:TWILIGHT 试验的一项子研究。
目的:在标准的首次事件发生时间分析中,与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后使用替卡格雷加阿司匹林相比,早期停用阿司匹林后使用替卡格雷单药治疗可减少出血而不增加缺血性并发症。我们评估了在考虑复发事件的情况下,这些治疗效果是否得以保留:在这项 TWILIGHT 试验的事后分析中,我们评估了替卡格雷单药治疗对 7 119 名高风险患者在 12 个月随访期间发生的事件总数的影响,这些患者在经皮冠状动脉介入术后 3 个月无事件且坚持治疗的情况下,除替卡格雷外,还随机接受了阿司匹林或安慰剂治疗。有 391 名患者至少发生过一次出血学术研究联盟 (BARC) 2、3 或 5 型出血(主要终点)。其中 28 例(7.2%)出现复发。替卡格雷单药治疗组的 BARC 2、3 或 5 型出血事件总数为 148 例,而替卡格雷加阿司匹林治疗组为 278 例(P,结论):在接受 PCI 并完成 3 个月双联抗血小板治疗后再接受替卡格雷加或不加阿司匹林治疗的选定高危患者中,12 个月内复发出血比复发缺血事件少见。对总事件的分析表明,在减少出血方面,替卡格雷单药治疗仍然比替卡格雷加阿司匹林治疗更有效,而且没有缺血性伤害的信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
14.10%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy (EHJ-CVP) is an international, peer-reviewed journal published in English, specifically dedicated to clinical cardiovascular pharmacology. EHJ-CVP publishes original articles focusing on clinical research involving both new and established drugs and methods, along with meta-analyses and topical reviews. The journal's primary aim is to enhance the pharmacological treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease by interpreting and integrating new scientific developments in this field. While the emphasis is on clinical topics, EHJ-CVP also considers basic research articles from fields such as physiology and molecular biology that contribute to the understanding of cardiovascular drug therapy. These may include articles related to new drug development and evaluation, the physiological and pharmacological basis of drug action, metabolism, drug interactions, and side effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信