The use of portable A-mode ultrasound in appendicular lean mass measurements among older adults: a comparison study with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and handgrip strength.
Lara Vilar Fernandes, Gabriela Benatti de Oliveira, Wagner Luis Ripka, Xiayu Summer Chen, Flavia Cristina Drumond Andrade, Ana Carolina Junqueira Vasques, Ligiana Pires Corona
{"title":"The use of portable A-mode ultrasound in appendicular lean mass measurements among older adults: a comparison study with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and handgrip strength.","authors":"Lara Vilar Fernandes, Gabriela Benatti de Oliveira, Wagner Luis Ripka, Xiayu Summer Chen, Flavia Cristina Drumond Andrade, Ana Carolina Junqueira Vasques, Ligiana Pires Corona","doi":"10.1038/s41430-024-01521-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Strength and muscle mass are key factors for the diagnosis of sarcopenia. The EWGSOP2 recommended using ultrasound (US) as a reliable device to measure muscle mass (MM), but A-mode US still needs to be validated for older adults. This study aimed to evaluate the association between measurements of muscle thickness (MT) by portable A-mode US and, muscle quantity by Dual-Energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study, with 115 participants included. Muscle mass was assessed by DXA and MT of the biceps, triceps, anterior thigh, and calf by A-mode US and handgrip strength by a dynamometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority were women (n = 96; 83%), 69 ± 6 years. The MT sum (biceps, triceps, thigh, and calf) assessed by the US was not associated with the appendicular lean mass (ALM) assessed by DXA after controlling for sex and age (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.524; p = 0.139; effect size = 0.53). The MT sum biceps and triceps was still significantly associated with MM arms/2 even when controlling for sex and age (which were also significant) (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.551; p < 0.001; effect size = 0.56). The MT sum thigh and calf was not associated with MM legs/2 in adjusted models (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.499; p = 0.688; effect size = 0.51).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This finding shows that the portable A-mode US may not be an appropriate method for estimating MM in extremities (the sum of arms and legs), but can be appropriate for estimating only MM arms in healthy older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":11927,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-024-01521-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/objectives: Strength and muscle mass are key factors for the diagnosis of sarcopenia. The EWGSOP2 recommended using ultrasound (US) as a reliable device to measure muscle mass (MM), but A-mode US still needs to be validated for older adults. This study aimed to evaluate the association between measurements of muscle thickness (MT) by portable A-mode US and, muscle quantity by Dual-Energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in older adults.
Methods: Cross-sectional study, with 115 participants included. Muscle mass was assessed by DXA and MT of the biceps, triceps, anterior thigh, and calf by A-mode US and handgrip strength by a dynamometer.
Results: The majority were women (n = 96; 83%), 69 ± 6 years. The MT sum (biceps, triceps, thigh, and calf) assessed by the US was not associated with the appendicular lean mass (ALM) assessed by DXA after controlling for sex and age (R2 = 0.524; p = 0.139; effect size = 0.53). The MT sum biceps and triceps was still significantly associated with MM arms/2 even when controlling for sex and age (which were also significant) (R2 = 0.551; p < 0.001; effect size = 0.56). The MT sum thigh and calf was not associated with MM legs/2 in adjusted models (R2 = 0.499; p = 0.688; effect size = 0.51).
Conclusions: This finding shows that the portable A-mode US may not be an appropriate method for estimating MM in extremities (the sum of arms and legs), but can be appropriate for estimating only MM arms in healthy older adults.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (EJCN) is an international, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of human and clinical nutrition. The journal welcomes original research, reviews, case reports and brief communications based on clinical, metabolic and epidemiological studies that describe methodologies, mechanisms, associations and benefits of nutritional interventions for clinical disease and health promotion.
Topics of interest include but are not limited to:
Nutrition and Health (including climate and ecological aspects)
Metabolism & Metabolomics
Genomics and personalized strategies in nutrition
Nutrition during the early life cycle
Health issues and nutrition in the elderly
Phenotyping in clinical nutrition
Nutrition in acute and chronic diseases
The double burden of ''malnutrition'': Under-nutrition and Obesity
Prevention of Non Communicable Diseases (NCD)