{"title":"Forensic STR and SNP Genotyping of Formalin-Fixed Skeleton Samples With Illumina's ForenSeq System.","authors":"Tingting Yang, Linlin Gao, Jiarong Zhang, Wei Xie, Wenjing Hu, Jiangwei Yan","doi":"10.1002/elps.202400056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Formalin fixatives are widely used in forensics to preserve tissues. However, extracting high-quality genomic DNA from formalin-fixed samples is challenging. Traditional short tandem repeat (STR) analysis using capillary electrophoresis (CE) for forensic DNA typing frequently results in failure. Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) can handle many samples and thousands of genetic markers, usually single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and STRs, in a single test. Thus, it is useful for assessing highly deteriorated forensic evidence. Few studies have examined the effectiveness of STRs and SNPs genotyping of formalin-fixed skeletons using MPS. In this study, 55 skeletal samples from 5 individuals that were treated under different formalin fixation times (5-75 days) were examined and sequenced using the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit on the Illumina MiSeq FGX platform. The results showed that as the duration of formalin fixation increased, the detection rates of STRs and SNPs gradually decreased. After 75 days of fixation, the average detection rates for STRs and SNPs were 4% and 10%, respectively. The cumulative discrimination power (CDP) of individual identification SNPs (iiSNPs) was >0.9999 on the 45th day. However, the CDP of STRs was 0.9930 on the 22nd day. Low detection rates were observed for six STRs (D1S1656, PentaE, D22S1045, PentaD, DX8378 and DX10103) and five SNPs (rs2920816, rs354439, rs1736442, rs338882 and rs1031825). In conclusion, DNA extracted from formalin-fixed skeletons decomposes rapidly over time, and MPS technology can be a useful tool for detecting forensic genetic markers in such samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":11596,"journal":{"name":"ELECTROPHORESIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELECTROPHORESIS","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.202400056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Formalin fixatives are widely used in forensics to preserve tissues. However, extracting high-quality genomic DNA from formalin-fixed samples is challenging. Traditional short tandem repeat (STR) analysis using capillary electrophoresis (CE) for forensic DNA typing frequently results in failure. Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) can handle many samples and thousands of genetic markers, usually single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and STRs, in a single test. Thus, it is useful for assessing highly deteriorated forensic evidence. Few studies have examined the effectiveness of STRs and SNPs genotyping of formalin-fixed skeletons using MPS. In this study, 55 skeletal samples from 5 individuals that were treated under different formalin fixation times (5-75 days) were examined and sequenced using the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit on the Illumina MiSeq FGX platform. The results showed that as the duration of formalin fixation increased, the detection rates of STRs and SNPs gradually decreased. After 75 days of fixation, the average detection rates for STRs and SNPs were 4% and 10%, respectively. The cumulative discrimination power (CDP) of individual identification SNPs (iiSNPs) was >0.9999 on the 45th day. However, the CDP of STRs was 0.9930 on the 22nd day. Low detection rates were observed for six STRs (D1S1656, PentaE, D22S1045, PentaD, DX8378 and DX10103) and five SNPs (rs2920816, rs354439, rs1736442, rs338882 and rs1031825). In conclusion, DNA extracted from formalin-fixed skeletons decomposes rapidly over time, and MPS technology can be a useful tool for detecting forensic genetic markers in such samples.
期刊介绍:
ELECTROPHORESIS is an international journal that publishes original manuscripts on all aspects of electrophoresis, and liquid phase separations (e.g., HPLC, micro- and nano-LC, UHPLC, micro- and nano-fluidics, liquid-phase micro-extractions, etc.).
Topics include new or improved analytical and preparative methods, sample preparation, development of theory, and innovative applications of electrophoretic and liquid phase separations methods in the study of nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates natural products, pharmaceuticals, food analysis, environmental species and other compounds of importance to the life sciences.
Papers in the areas of microfluidics and proteomics, which are not limited to electrophoresis-based methods, will also be accepted for publication. Contributions focused on hyphenated and omics techniques are also of interest. Proteomics is within the scope, if related to its fundamentals and new technical approaches. Proteomics applications are only considered in particular cases.
Papers describing the application of standard electrophoretic methods will not be considered.
Papers on nanoanalysis intended for publication in ELECTROPHORESIS should focus on one or more of the following topics:
• Nanoscale electrokinetics and phenomena related to electric double layer and/or confinement in nano-sized geometry
• Single cell and subcellular analysis
• Nanosensors and ultrasensitive detection aspects (e.g., involving quantum dots, "nanoelectrodes" or nanospray MS)
• Nanoscale/nanopore DNA sequencing (next generation sequencing)
• Micro- and nanoscale sample preparation
• Nanoparticles and cells analyses by dielectrophoresis
• Separation-based analysis using nanoparticles, nanotubes and nanowires.