Prognostic role of albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score and Child-Pugh classification in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma under systemic treatment.

IF 1.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY
ecancermedicalscience Pub Date : 2024-08-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3332/ecancer.2024.1748
Leonardo G da Fonsecaa, Marina Acevedo Zarzar de Melob, Thamires Haick Martins da Silveirac, Victor Junji Yamamotod, Pedro Henrique Shimiti Hashizumee, Jorge Sabbagaf
{"title":"Prognostic role of albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score and Child-Pugh classification in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma under systemic treatment.","authors":"Leonardo G da Fonsecaa, Marina Acevedo Zarzar de Melob, Thamires Haick Martins da Silveirac, Victor Junji Yamamotod, Pedro Henrique Shimiti Hashizumee, Jorge Sabbagaf","doi":"10.3332/ecancer.2024.1748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a lethal malignancy associated with cirrhosis and liver dysfunction. The aim of this study is to characterize a cohort of patients with advanced HCC according to liver function-related variables and evaluate the prognostic significance of Child-Pugh (CP) and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) scores. A database of 406 HCC patients treated between 2009 and 2023 was retrospectively evaluated. Clinical and laboratory parameters were collected to classify patients into ALBI and CP scores. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate models were used to evaluate prognosis prediction. In this cohort, 337 (83%) patients were classified as CP-A, while 69 (17%) as CP-B. Additionally, according to ALBI score, 159 (39.2%) individuals were categorised as ALBI-1, 233 (57.4%) as ALBI-2 and 14 (3.4%) as ALBI-3. A statistically significant association between both classifications was observed (<i>p</i> < 0.001). CP and ALBI scores were independently associated with prognosis (Hazard ratio = 2.93 and 1.66, respectively), with better survival for patients with CP-A (versus B) and ALBI-1 (versus -2 and -3). ALBI score showed better predictive performance versus CP (c Harrell´s C index = 0.65 versus 0.62; <i>p</i> = 0.008) and ALBI evolution during the first month of treatment was associated with overall survival. Additionally, ALBI score was able to define distinct prognostic subgroups within CP-A patients. In conclusion, liver function scores, such as ALBI and CP, have a clinically relevant prognostic role in patients with advanced HCC under systemic treatment. ALBI score is a more granular scoring scale than CP, and enables a more precise evaluation of patients with CP-A.</p>","PeriodicalId":11460,"journal":{"name":"ecancermedicalscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1748"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ecancermedicalscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2024.1748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a lethal malignancy associated with cirrhosis and liver dysfunction. The aim of this study is to characterize a cohort of patients with advanced HCC according to liver function-related variables and evaluate the prognostic significance of Child-Pugh (CP) and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) scores. A database of 406 HCC patients treated between 2009 and 2023 was retrospectively evaluated. Clinical and laboratory parameters were collected to classify patients into ALBI and CP scores. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate models were used to evaluate prognosis prediction. In this cohort, 337 (83%) patients were classified as CP-A, while 69 (17%) as CP-B. Additionally, according to ALBI score, 159 (39.2%) individuals were categorised as ALBI-1, 233 (57.4%) as ALBI-2 and 14 (3.4%) as ALBI-3. A statistically significant association between both classifications was observed (p < 0.001). CP and ALBI scores were independently associated with prognosis (Hazard ratio = 2.93 and 1.66, respectively), with better survival for patients with CP-A (versus B) and ALBI-1 (versus -2 and -3). ALBI score showed better predictive performance versus CP (c Harrell´s C index = 0.65 versus 0.62; p = 0.008) and ALBI evolution during the first month of treatment was associated with overall survival. Additionally, ALBI score was able to define distinct prognostic subgroups within CP-A patients. In conclusion, liver function scores, such as ALBI and CP, have a clinically relevant prognostic role in patients with advanced HCC under systemic treatment. ALBI score is a more granular scoring scale than CP, and enables a more precise evaluation of patients with CP-A.

白蛋白-胆红素 (ALBI) 评分和 Child-Pugh 分级对接受全身治疗的晚期肝细胞癌患者的预后作用。
肝细胞癌(HCC)是一种与肝硬化和肝功能异常相关的致命恶性肿瘤。本研究旨在根据肝功能相关变量描述一组晚期HCC患者的特征,并评估Child-Pugh(CP)和白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)评分的预后意义。我们对2009年至2023年间接受治疗的406名HCC患者的数据库进行了回顾性评估。通过收集临床和实验室参数,将患者分为 ALBI 和 CP 两级。采用卡普兰-梅耶法估算生存率,并使用多变量模型评估预后预测。在该队列中,有 337 例(83%)患者被划分为 CP-A,69 例(17%)被划分为 CP-B。此外,根据 ALBI 评分,159 人(39.2%)被归类为 ALBI-1,233 人(57.4%)被归类为 ALBI-2,14 人(3.4%)被归类为 ALBI-3。这两种分类之间存在明显的统计学关联(P < 0.001)。CP和ALBI评分与预后独立相关(危险比分别为2.93和1.66),CP-A(相对于B)和ALBI-1(相对于-2和-3)的患者生存率更高。与 CP 相比,ALBI 评分显示出更好的预测性能(c Harrell´s C 指数 = 0.65 对 0.62;p = 0.008),治疗第一个月的 ALBI 变化与总生存率相关。此外,ALBI评分还能在CP-A患者中定义不同的预后亚组。总之,ALBI 和 CP 等肝功能评分对接受全身治疗的晚期 HCC 患者具有临床相关预后作用。ALBI 评分比 CP 评分更精细,能对 CP-A 患者进行更精确的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信