Beenu Bastian , Lisa Gaye Smithers , Alexia Pape , Warren Davis , K. Fu , Monique Francois
{"title":"Early screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and its impact on perinatal outcomes","authors":"Beenu Bastian , Lisa Gaye Smithers , Alexia Pape , Warren Davis , K. Fu , Monique Francois","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes following early diagnosis compared with routine diagnosis of gestational diabetes (GDM).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this observational study, 3494 women were categorised by weeks of gestation at GDM diagnosis: early GDM (≤20 weeks) and routine GDM (>20 weeks). The early GDM group was further divided by treatment commencement as immediate (<12 weeks) and delayed (12–20 weeks) and by diagnostic fasting blood glucose as higher-FBG (5.3–6.0 mmol/L) and lower-FBG group (FBG 5.1–5.2 mmol/L). Primary outcomes were large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA). Generalized linear models used to calculate risk ratios and adjusted for confounding.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Risk ratios (RR) for LGA and SGA were similar for early versus routine diagnosis, and immediate versus delayed treatment. The higher-FBG immediate treatment group had a lower risk of newborn respiratory distress (RR 0.52, 95 %CI 0.34, 0.81) and emergency caesarean (RR 0.55, 95 %CI 0.34, 0.88) compared to the higher-FBG delayed treatment group. Among the lower-FBG group, no such benefits were seen.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Fasting glucose levels modified the effects of early treatment of GDM where a higher-FBG with immediate treatment appears to reduce perinatal complications, but treating women with lower-FBG early has no benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 111890"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822724008003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims
To compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes following early diagnosis compared with routine diagnosis of gestational diabetes (GDM).
Methods
In this observational study, 3494 women were categorised by weeks of gestation at GDM diagnosis: early GDM (≤20 weeks) and routine GDM (>20 weeks). The early GDM group was further divided by treatment commencement as immediate (<12 weeks) and delayed (12–20 weeks) and by diagnostic fasting blood glucose as higher-FBG (5.3–6.0 mmol/L) and lower-FBG group (FBG 5.1–5.2 mmol/L). Primary outcomes were large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA). Generalized linear models used to calculate risk ratios and adjusted for confounding.
Results
Risk ratios (RR) for LGA and SGA were similar for early versus routine diagnosis, and immediate versus delayed treatment. The higher-FBG immediate treatment group had a lower risk of newborn respiratory distress (RR 0.52, 95 %CI 0.34, 0.81) and emergency caesarean (RR 0.55, 95 %CI 0.34, 0.88) compared to the higher-FBG delayed treatment group. Among the lower-FBG group, no such benefits were seen.
Conclusions
Fasting glucose levels modified the effects of early treatment of GDM where a higher-FBG with immediate treatment appears to reduce perinatal complications, but treating women with lower-FBG early has no benefits.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.