The effect of eccentric arm cycling on muscle damage and injury-related biomarkers.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Frode Gottschalk, Mikael Gennser, Ola Eiken, Antonis Elia
{"title":"The effect of eccentric arm cycling on muscle damage and injury-related biomarkers.","authors":"Frode Gottschalk, Mikael Gennser, Ola Eiken, Antonis Elia","doi":"10.1111/cpf.12911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is a scarcity of information regarding the effect of upper-body eccentric exercise on biomarkers of muscle damage. This study sought to investigate the effect of eccentric arm cycling on muscle damage [exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD)].</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Ten subjects performed a 15 min eccentric arm cycling protocol (cadence 49 ± 7 rpm, power absorbed 248 ± 34 W). Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the elbow flexors was evaluated at rest and at 5 min, 24 h, and 48 h post-exercise. In addition, blood samples were drawn at rest and thereafter at 30 min, 24 h, and 48 h intervals after exercise for quantification of creatine kinase (CK), myoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and endothelin (ET-1) concentrations. Delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) was assessed using a category ratio scale (0-10).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Myoglobin was increased from baseline at 30 min post-exercise (+114%, 46.08 ± 22.17 µg/L, p = 0.018). Individual peak values were higher than baseline values for CK (+72.8%, 204 ± 138 U/L, p = 0.046) and LDH (+17%, 3.3 ± 0.88 nmole/min/mL, p = 0.017), but not for ET-1 (+9%, 1.4 ± 0.48 pg/mL, p = 0.45). DOMS was reported at 24 h (median 4) and 48 h (median 4) post-exercise and MVC of the elbow flexors were reduced from baseline (216 ± 44 N) at 5 min (-34%, 147 ± 61 N, p < 0.001), 24 h (-17%, 181 ± 56 N, p = 0.005) and 48 h (-9%, 191 ± 54 N, p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Eccentric arm cycling incites EIMD with reduced MVC and elevation of myoglobin, CK and LDH.</p>","PeriodicalId":10504,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12911","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: There is a scarcity of information regarding the effect of upper-body eccentric exercise on biomarkers of muscle damage. This study sought to investigate the effect of eccentric arm cycling on muscle damage [exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD)].

Method: Ten subjects performed a 15 min eccentric arm cycling protocol (cadence 49 ± 7 rpm, power absorbed 248 ± 34 W). Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the elbow flexors was evaluated at rest and at 5 min, 24 h, and 48 h post-exercise. In addition, blood samples were drawn at rest and thereafter at 30 min, 24 h, and 48 h intervals after exercise for quantification of creatine kinase (CK), myoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and endothelin (ET-1) concentrations. Delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) was assessed using a category ratio scale (0-10).

Results: Myoglobin was increased from baseline at 30 min post-exercise (+114%, 46.08 ± 22.17 µg/L, p = 0.018). Individual peak values were higher than baseline values for CK (+72.8%, 204 ± 138 U/L, p = 0.046) and LDH (+17%, 3.3 ± 0.88 nmole/min/mL, p = 0.017), but not for ET-1 (+9%, 1.4 ± 0.48 pg/mL, p = 0.45). DOMS was reported at 24 h (median 4) and 48 h (median 4) post-exercise and MVC of the elbow flexors were reduced from baseline (216 ± 44 N) at 5 min (-34%, 147 ± 61 N, p < 0.001), 24 h (-17%, 181 ± 56 N, p = 0.005) and 48 h (-9%, 191 ± 54 N, p = 0.003).

Conclusion: Eccentric arm cycling incites EIMD with reduced MVC and elevation of myoglobin, CK and LDH.

手臂偏心骑行对肌肉损伤和损伤相关生物标志物的影响
目的:有关上半身偏心运动对肌肉损伤生物标志物的影响的信息很少。本研究旨在调查偏心臂骑行对肌肉损伤[运动诱发的肌肉损伤(EIMD)]的影响:方法:10 名受试者进行了 15 分钟的偏心手臂骑行(速度为 49 ± 7 rpm,吸收功率为 248 ± 34 W)。分别在休息时、运动后 5 分钟、24 小时和 48 小时评估肘部屈肌的最大自主收缩力(MVC)。此外,还在休息时和运动后 30 分钟、24 小时和 48 小时抽取血液样本,以量化肌酸激酶(CK)、肌红蛋白、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)和内皮素(ET-1)的浓度。延迟性肌肉酸痛(DOMS)采用类别比率表(0-10)进行评估:结果:运动后 30 分钟肌红蛋白比基线高(+114%,46.08 ± 22.17 µg/L,p = 0.018)。CK(+72.8%,204 ± 138 U/L,p = 0.046)和 LDH(+17%,3.3 ± 0.88 nmole/min/mL,p = 0.017)的单项峰值高于基线值,但 ET-1(+9%,1.4 ± 0.48 pg/mL,p = 0.45)的单项峰值低于基线值。运动后 24 小时(中位数为 4)和 48 小时(中位数为 4)出现 DOMS,5 分钟时肘屈肌的 MVC 从基线(216 ± 44 N)降低(-34%,147 ± 61 N,p 结论:运动后 24 小时和 48 小时,肘屈肌的 MVC 从基线(216 ± 44 N)降低(-34%,147 ± 61 N,p):偏心臂力自行车运动会诱发 EIMD,导致肌收缩力降低以及肌红蛋白、肌酸激酶和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging publishes reports on clinical and experimental research pertinent to human physiology in health and disease. The scope of the Journal is very broad, covering all aspects of the regulatory system in the cardiovascular, renal and pulmonary systems with special emphasis on methodological aspects. The focus for the journal is, however, work that has potential clinical relevance. The Journal also features review articles on recent front-line research within these fields of interest. Covered by the major abstracting services including Current Contents and Science Citation Index, Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging plays an important role in providing effective and productive communication among clinical physiologists world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信