Patch test results to the Spanish baseline patch test series according to age groups: A multicentric prospective study from 2019 to 2023.

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
David Pesqué, Nidia Planella-Fontanillas, Leopoldo Borrego, Tatiana Sanz-Sánchez, Violeta Zaragoza-Ninet, Esther Serra-Baldrich, Francisco Javier Miquel-Miquel, Juan Francisco Silvestre-Salvador, Susana Córdoba-Guijarro, Araceli Sánchez-Gilo, Pedro Mercader-García, Francisco José Navarro-Triviño, Francisco Javier Ortiz-de-Frutos, Fátima Tous-Romero, Mercedes Rodríguez-Serna, Gemma Melé-Ninot, Cristina Barrabés-Torrella, Inmaculada Ruiz-González, María Antonia Pastor-Nieto, José Manuel Carrascosa-Carrillo, Enrique Gómez-de-la-Fuente, Paloma Sánchez-Pedreño-Guillén, Javier Sánchez-Pérez, José Juan Pereyra-Rodríguez, María Elena Gatica-Ortega, Ricardo González-Pérez, Ramon Maria Pujol, Miguel Ángel Gallego Descalzo, Ignacio García-Doval, Ana María Giménez-Arnau
{"title":"Patch test results to the Spanish baseline patch test series according to age groups: A multicentric prospective study from 2019 to 2023.","authors":"David Pesqué, Nidia Planella-Fontanillas, Leopoldo Borrego, Tatiana Sanz-Sánchez, Violeta Zaragoza-Ninet, Esther Serra-Baldrich, Francisco Javier Miquel-Miquel, Juan Francisco Silvestre-Salvador, Susana Córdoba-Guijarro, Araceli Sánchez-Gilo, Pedro Mercader-García, Francisco José Navarro-Triviño, Francisco Javier Ortiz-de-Frutos, Fátima Tous-Romero, Mercedes Rodríguez-Serna, Gemma Melé-Ninot, Cristina Barrabés-Torrella, Inmaculada Ruiz-González, María Antonia Pastor-Nieto, José Manuel Carrascosa-Carrillo, Enrique Gómez-de-la-Fuente, Paloma Sánchez-Pedreño-Guillén, Javier Sánchez-Pérez, José Juan Pereyra-Rodríguez, María Elena Gatica-Ortega, Ricardo González-Pérez, Ramon Maria Pujol, Miguel Ángel Gallego Descalzo, Ignacio García-Doval, Ana María Giménez-Arnau","doi":"10.1111/cod.14702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patch test results may be influenced by age-related factors. However, there is still discordant evidence between age and patch test results.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aim to evaluate the patch test results reflecting skin sensitisation, their relevance and association with clinical features by age group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective multicentric study of all patients patch tested with the Spanish baseline series in participating centres. Age groups were pre-defined as children (0- to 11-years), adolescents (12- to 18-years), young adults (19- to 30-years), middle-aged adults (31- to 65-years) and older adults (≥66-years). Occurrence of sensitisation, relevance and clinical features were compared by age group. Factors associated with skin sensitisation were investigated with multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 368 patients were patch-tested. Differences in positive patch test results and relevance by age were detected with the highest proportion in middle-aged adults. Age-related trend differences were found for nickel, potassium dichromate, caines, colophony, Myroxylon pereirae resin, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and limonene hydroperoxide. The multivariate logistic analysis (adjusted for sex, atopic dermatitis, body location and occupational dermatitis) showed an association between the age group of 31-65 (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.26-1.58) and above 66-years (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01-1.32) with a higher proportion of positive results, compared with young adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Positive patch test results vary according to age, with the highest occurrence in middle-aged adults. Most haptens did not present age-related differences, reinforcing the use of baseline series regardless of age.</p>","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14702","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patch test results may be influenced by age-related factors. However, there is still discordant evidence between age and patch test results.

Objectives: We aim to evaluate the patch test results reflecting skin sensitisation, their relevance and association with clinical features by age group.

Methods: Prospective multicentric study of all patients patch tested with the Spanish baseline series in participating centres. Age groups were pre-defined as children (0- to 11-years), adolescents (12- to 18-years), young adults (19- to 30-years), middle-aged adults (31- to 65-years) and older adults (≥66-years). Occurrence of sensitisation, relevance and clinical features were compared by age group. Factors associated with skin sensitisation were investigated with multivariate logistic regression.

Results: A total of 13 368 patients were patch-tested. Differences in positive patch test results and relevance by age were detected with the highest proportion in middle-aged adults. Age-related trend differences were found for nickel, potassium dichromate, caines, colophony, Myroxylon pereirae resin, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and limonene hydroperoxide. The multivariate logistic analysis (adjusted for sex, atopic dermatitis, body location and occupational dermatitis) showed an association between the age group of 31-65 (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.26-1.58) and above 66-years (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01-1.32) with a higher proportion of positive results, compared with young adults.

Conclusions: Positive patch test results vary according to age, with the highest occurrence in middle-aged adults. Most haptens did not present age-related differences, reinforcing the use of baseline series regardless of age.

根据年龄组对西班牙基线斑贴试验系列进行的斑贴试验结果:2019年至2023年多中心前瞻性研究。
简介斑贴试验结果可能会受到年龄因素的影响。然而,年龄与斑贴试验结果之间仍存在不一致的证据:我们旨在评估反映皮肤过敏的斑贴试验结果、其相关性以及与不同年龄组临床特征的联系:前瞻性多中心研究:在参与中心对所有接受西班牙基线系列贴片测试的患者进行研究。年龄组预先定义为儿童(0 至 11 岁)、青少年(12 至 18 岁)、青年(19 至 30 岁)、中年(31 至 65 岁)和老年人(≥ 66 岁)。对不同年龄组的过敏发生率、相关性和临床特征进行了比较。采用多变量逻辑回归法研究了与皮肤过敏相关的因素:共有 13 368 名患者接受了斑贴试验。发现不同年龄段的斑贴试验阳性结果和相关性存在差异,中年人的比例最高。发现镍、重铬酸钾、凯因、可乐定、麝香石竹树脂、甲基丙烯酸 2-羟乙基酯和过氧化氢柠檬烯都存在与年龄相关的趋势性差异。多变量逻辑分析(已对性别、特应性皮炎、身体部位和职业性皮炎进行调整)显示,与年轻人相比,31-65 岁年龄组(OR:1.41,95% CI:1.26-1.58)和 66 岁以上年龄组(OR:1.15,95% CI:1.01-1.32)的阳性结果比例更高:结论:斑贴试验阳性结果因年龄而异,中年人的阳性率最高。大多数过敏原并不存在与年龄相关的差异,因此无论年龄如何,都应使用基线系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contact Dermatitis
Contact Dermatitis 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
30.90%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Contact Dermatitis is designed primarily as a journal for clinicians who are interested in various aspects of environmental dermatitis. This includes both allergic and irritant (toxic) types of contact dermatitis, occupational (industrial) dermatitis and consumers" dermatitis from such products as cosmetics and toiletries. The journal aims at promoting and maintaining communication among dermatologists, industrial physicians, allergists and clinical immunologists, as well as chemists and research workers involved in industry and the production of consumer goods. Papers are invited on clinical observations, diagnosis and methods of investigation of patients, therapeutic measures, organisation and legislation relating to the control of occupational and consumers".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信