Evaluation of validity, reliability and ability to detect change for the Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) and evaluation of HECSI-75 and HECSI-90 as within-patient responder definitions.

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Yasemin Topal Yüksel, Henrik Thoning, Lotte Seiding Larsen, Lucine Lehmann, Rob Arbuckle, Laura Grant, Tove Agner
{"title":"Evaluation of validity, reliability and ability to detect change for the Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) and evaluation of HECSI-75 and HECSI-90 as within-patient responder definitions.","authors":"Yasemin Topal Yüksel, Henrik Thoning, Lotte Seiding Larsen, Lucine Lehmann, Rob Arbuckle, Laura Grant, Tove Agner","doi":"10.1111/cod.14699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) is a Clinician-Reported Outcome measure of the severity of hand eczema (HE).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the validity, reliability and ability to detect change of the HECSI, and the HECSI-75 and HECSI-90 as responder definitions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses were performed using data from a sample of n = 258 patients with Chronic Hand Eczema (CHE) from a Phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial of delgocitinib cream, pooled across treatment groups. The measurement properties of the HECSI were assessed and the adequacy of the HECSI-75 and HECSI-90 as responder definitions was explored through cross-tabulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-item correlations provided support for the scoring, whereby items are grouped by areas of the hand. HECSI demonstrated good test-retest reliability with intra-class correlations >0.70. Construct validity was supported by a logical pattern of correlations with concurrent measures and significant differences in HECSI scores across severity groups (p < 0.001). HECSI was responsive with statistically significant improvements over time and with significant differences (p < 0.001) between improved and stable groups. Data provided support for both HECSI-75 and HECSI-90 as within-patient responder definitions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HECSI has strong validity, reliability and ability to detect change as a measure of CHE severity. HECSI-75 and HECSI-90 are appropriate responder definitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14699","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) is a Clinician-Reported Outcome measure of the severity of hand eczema (HE).

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the validity, reliability and ability to detect change of the HECSI, and the HECSI-75 and HECSI-90 as responder definitions.

Methods: Analyses were performed using data from a sample of n = 258 patients with Chronic Hand Eczema (CHE) from a Phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial of delgocitinib cream, pooled across treatment groups. The measurement properties of the HECSI were assessed and the adequacy of the HECSI-75 and HECSI-90 as responder definitions was explored through cross-tabulation.

Results: Inter-item correlations provided support for the scoring, whereby items are grouped by areas of the hand. HECSI demonstrated good test-retest reliability with intra-class correlations >0.70. Construct validity was supported by a logical pattern of correlations with concurrent measures and significant differences in HECSI scores across severity groups (p < 0.001). HECSI was responsive with statistically significant improvements over time and with significant differences (p < 0.001) between improved and stable groups. Data provided support for both HECSI-75 and HECSI-90 as within-patient responder definitions.

Conclusions: HECSI has strong validity, reliability and ability to detect change as a measure of CHE severity. HECSI-75 and HECSI-90 are appropriate responder definitions.

评估手部湿疹严重程度指数(HECSI)的有效性、可靠性和检测变化的能力,并评估 HECSI-75 和 HECSI-90 作为患者内部应答者定义的效果。
背景:手部湿疹严重程度指数(HECSI)是一种由临床医生报告结果的手部湿疹(HE)严重程度测量方法:本研究旨在评估手部湿疹严重程度指数、HECSI-75 和 HECSI-90 作为应答者定义的有效性、可靠性和检测变化的能力:使用来自慢性手部湿疹(CHE)2b期随机、双盲、载体对照试验的n = 258名患者的样本数据进行了分析,并汇总了各治疗组的数据。我们评估了HECSI的测量特性,并通过交叉分析探讨了HECSI-75和HECSI-90作为应答者定义的适当性:结果:项目间相关性为按手部区域分组的计分方法提供了支持。HECSI 具有良好的测试-再测可靠性,类内相关性大于 0.70。与同期测量结果的逻辑相关性以及不同严重程度组别之间 HECSI 分数的显著差异(p 结论)也证明了结构效度:作为衡量 CHE 严重程度的指标,HECSI 具有很强的有效性、可靠性和检测变化的能力。HECSI-75 和 HECSI-90 是合适的反应者定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contact Dermatitis
Contact Dermatitis 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
30.90%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Contact Dermatitis is designed primarily as a journal for clinicians who are interested in various aspects of environmental dermatitis. This includes both allergic and irritant (toxic) types of contact dermatitis, occupational (industrial) dermatitis and consumers" dermatitis from such products as cosmetics and toiletries. The journal aims at promoting and maintaining communication among dermatologists, industrial physicians, allergists and clinical immunologists, as well as chemists and research workers involved in industry and the production of consumer goods. Papers are invited on clinical observations, diagnosis and methods of investigation of patients, therapeutic measures, organisation and legislation relating to the control of occupational and consumers".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信