Clinical outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment using NeoSealer Flo and Endosequence BC Sealer: A retrospective analysis with short-term follow-up.
Christian Lepure, Ryan M Walsh, Sayeed Attar, Casey L Turner, Joshua Crawford, Poorya Jalali
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment using NeoSealer Flo and Endosequence BC Sealer: A retrospective analysis with short-term follow-up.","authors":"Christian Lepure, Ryan M Walsh, Sayeed Attar, Casey L Turner, Joshua Crawford, Poorya Jalali","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-05995-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sealers are an important component in root canal obturation to provide the seal of the root canal system. In recent years, there has been an increase in the use of hydraulic silicate sealers, commonly referred to as bioceramic sealers, due to their many advantageous properties. NeoSealer Flo (NS; Avalon Biomed USA, Houston TX) is a recently introduced premixed bioceramic sealer. There is limited evidence on its properties and clinical performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of root canal treatment using NS in a sealer-based obturation technique.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The records of patients in a private practice between 2017 and 2022 were analyzed to identify both initial and retreatment cases obturated with either EndoSequence BC sealer or NS using sealer-based obturation with a minimum of one-year follow-up. Treatment outcome between NS and BC was compared with chi-square test. Logistic regression was used to identify additional prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred and eighty-seven teeth met the inclusion criteria for the study. The success rate of cases obturated with BC was 94.9% and 96.5% for the cases obturated with NS. No statistically significant differences were found between the two sealer types. Presence of a periapical radiolucency or periapical radiolucency > 5.00 mm were statistically significant prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endodontic treatment using BC or NS with sealer-based obturation method is a viable treatment option.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Root canal obturation with bioceramic sealers, such as NeoSealer Flo and Endosequence BC sealer, provide favorable clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"28 11","pages":"598"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05995-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Sealers are an important component in root canal obturation to provide the seal of the root canal system. In recent years, there has been an increase in the use of hydraulic silicate sealers, commonly referred to as bioceramic sealers, due to their many advantageous properties. NeoSealer Flo (NS; Avalon Biomed USA, Houston TX) is a recently introduced premixed bioceramic sealer. There is limited evidence on its properties and clinical performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of root canal treatment using NS in a sealer-based obturation technique.
Materials and methods: The records of patients in a private practice between 2017 and 2022 were analyzed to identify both initial and retreatment cases obturated with either EndoSequence BC sealer or NS using sealer-based obturation with a minimum of one-year follow-up. Treatment outcome between NS and BC was compared with chi-square test. Logistic regression was used to identify additional prognostic factors.
Results: Six hundred and eighty-seven teeth met the inclusion criteria for the study. The success rate of cases obturated with BC was 94.9% and 96.5% for the cases obturated with NS. No statistically significant differences were found between the two sealer types. Presence of a periapical radiolucency or periapical radiolucency > 5.00 mm were statistically significant prognostic factors.
Conclusions: Endodontic treatment using BC or NS with sealer-based obturation method is a viable treatment option.
Clinical relevance: Root canal obturation with bioceramic sealers, such as NeoSealer Flo and Endosequence BC sealer, provide favorable clinical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.