Association Between Family Income, Subclinical Myocardial Injury, and Cardiovascular Mortality in the General Population

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Sneha Chebrolu, Richard Kazibwe, Elsayed Z. Soliman
{"title":"Association Between Family Income, Subclinical Myocardial Injury, and Cardiovascular Mortality in the General Population","authors":"Sneha Chebrolu,&nbsp;Richard Kazibwe,&nbsp;Elsayed Z. Soliman","doi":"10.1002/clc.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Both low family income and subclinical myocardial injury (SCMI) are risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. However, the impact of their joint association on CVD mortality is unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This analysis from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey included 6805 participants (age 59.1 ± 13.4 years, 52.3% women, and 49.8% White) free of CVD at baseline. Family income was assessed using the poverty-income ratio (PIR) and categorized into low (PIR &lt; 1), middle (PIR = 1–4), and high (PIR &gt; 4) income. A validated ECG-based cardiac infarction injury score (CIIS) ≥ 10 was considered positive for SCMI. CVD mortality was determined using the National Death Index. Cox-proportional hazard analysis was used to evaluate the associations of family income and SCMI, separately and jointly, with CVD mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 1782 (26.2%) participants had SCMI at baseline. During a median follow-up of 18.2 years, 856 (12.6%) events of CVD mortality occurred. In separate multivariable Cox models, SCMI (vs. no SCMI) and middle- and low-income (vs. high-income) were each associated with a higher risk of CVD mortality (HR [95% CI]: 1.34 [1.16–1.54], 1.44 [1.16–1.78], and 1.59 [1.22–2.07], respectively). Compared to high-income participants without SCMI, those with low-income and SCMI had an increased risk of CVD mortality (HR [95% CI]: 2.17 [1.53–3.08]). The multiplicative interaction between PIR and SCMI was not significant (<i>p</i> = 0.054).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Lower family income and SCMI are associated with CVD mortality, and their concomitant presence is associated with the highest risk. Family income and SCMI may help in the individualized assessment of CVD risk.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Both low family income and subclinical myocardial injury (SCMI) are risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. However, the impact of their joint association on CVD mortality is unclear.

Methods

This analysis from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey included 6805 participants (age 59.1 ± 13.4 years, 52.3% women, and 49.8% White) free of CVD at baseline. Family income was assessed using the poverty-income ratio (PIR) and categorized into low (PIR < 1), middle (PIR = 1–4), and high (PIR > 4) income. A validated ECG-based cardiac infarction injury score (CIIS) ≥ 10 was considered positive for SCMI. CVD mortality was determined using the National Death Index. Cox-proportional hazard analysis was used to evaluate the associations of family income and SCMI, separately and jointly, with CVD mortality.

Results

A total of 1782 (26.2%) participants had SCMI at baseline. During a median follow-up of 18.2 years, 856 (12.6%) events of CVD mortality occurred. In separate multivariable Cox models, SCMI (vs. no SCMI) and middle- and low-income (vs. high-income) were each associated with a higher risk of CVD mortality (HR [95% CI]: 1.34 [1.16–1.54], 1.44 [1.16–1.78], and 1.59 [1.22–2.07], respectively). Compared to high-income participants without SCMI, those with low-income and SCMI had an increased risk of CVD mortality (HR [95% CI]: 2.17 [1.53–3.08]). The multiplicative interaction between PIR and SCMI was not significant (p = 0.054).

Conclusion

Lower family income and SCMI are associated with CVD mortality, and their concomitant presence is associated with the highest risk. Family income and SCMI may help in the individualized assessment of CVD risk.

Abstract Image

普通人群中家庭收入、亚临床心肌损伤与心血管死亡率之间的关系。
导言:低家庭收入和亚临床心肌损伤(SCMI)都是心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率的风险因素。然而,它们共同对心血管疾病死亡率的影响尚不清楚:这项分析来自第三次全国健康与营养调查,包括 6805 名基线时无心血管疾病的参与者(年龄为 59.1 ± 13.4 岁,52.3% 为女性,49.8% 为白人)。家庭收入采用贫困收入比(PIR)进行评估,并分为低收入(PIR 4)。基于心电图的心肌梗死损伤评分 (CIIS) ≥ 10 分被视为 SCMI 阳性。心血管疾病死亡率通过国家死亡指数确定。采用 Cox 比例危险分析法评估家庭收入和 SCMI(单独或共同)与心血管疾病死亡率的关系:共有 1782 人(26.2%)在基线时拥有 SCMI。在中位 18.2 年的随访期间,发生了 856 例(12.6%)心血管疾病死亡事件。在单独的多变量 Cox 模型中,SCMI(与无 SCMI 相比)和中低收入(与高收入相比)分别与较高的心血管疾病死亡风险相关(HR [95% CI]:分别为 1.34 [1.16-1.54]、1.44 [1.16-1.78] 和 1.59 [1.22-2.07])。与没有 SCMI 的高收入参与者相比,有低收入和 SCMI 的参与者的心血管疾病死亡风险更高(HR [95% CI]:2.17 [1.53-3.08])。PIR与SCMI之间的乘法交互作用不显著(P = 0.054):结论:较低的家庭收入和 SCMI 与心血管疾病死亡率相关,同时存在这两个因素的风险最高。家庭收入和 SCMI 可能有助于对心血管疾病风险进行个性化评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信