Prediction of Microinvasion in Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Using Conventional Ultrasound Combined with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Features: A Two-Center Study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Tingting Wu, Jing Chen, Sihui Shao, Yu Du, Fang Li, Hui Liu, Liping Sun, Xuehong Diao, Rong Wu
{"title":"Prediction of Microinvasion in Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Using Conventional Ultrasound Combined with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Features: A Two-Center Study.","authors":"Tingting Wu, Jing Chen, Sihui Shao, Yu Du, Fang Li, Hui Liu, Liping Sun, Xuehong Diao, Rong Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.09.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To develop and validate a model based on conventional ultrasound (CUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features to preoperatively predict microinvasion in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data from 163 patients with DCIS who underwent CUS and CEUS from the internal hospital was retrospectively collected and randomly apportioned into training and internal validation sets in a ratio of 7:3. External validation set included 56 patients with DCIS from the external hospital. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to determine the independent risk factors associated with microinvasion. These factors were used to develop predictive models. The performance was evaluated through calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate analysis indicated that centripetal enhancement direction (odds ratio [OR], 13.268; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.687-47.746) and enhancement range enlarged on CEUS (OR, 4.876; 95% CI, 1.470-16.181), lesion size of ≥20 mm (OR, 3.265; 95% CI, 1.230-8.669) and calcification detected on CUS (OR, 5.174; 95% CI, 1.903-14.066) were independent risk factors associated with microinvasion. The nomogram incorporated the CUS and CEUS features achieved favorable discrimination (AUCs of 0.850, 0.848, and 0.879 for the training, internal and external validation datasets), with good calibration. The nomogram outperformed the CUS model and CEUS model (all P < .05). Decision curve analysis confirmed that the predictive nomogram was clinically useful.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The nomogram based on CUS and CEUS features showed promising predictive value for the preoperative identification of microinvasion in patients with DCIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.09.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To develop and validate a model based on conventional ultrasound (CUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features to preoperatively predict microinvasion in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Patients and methods: Data from 163 patients with DCIS who underwent CUS and CEUS from the internal hospital was retrospectively collected and randomly apportioned into training and internal validation sets in a ratio of 7:3. External validation set included 56 patients with DCIS from the external hospital. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to determine the independent risk factors associated with microinvasion. These factors were used to develop predictive models. The performance was evaluated through calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility.

Results: Multivariate analysis indicated that centripetal enhancement direction (odds ratio [OR], 13.268; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.687-47.746) and enhancement range enlarged on CEUS (OR, 4.876; 95% CI, 1.470-16.181), lesion size of ≥20 mm (OR, 3.265; 95% CI, 1.230-8.669) and calcification detected on CUS (OR, 5.174; 95% CI, 1.903-14.066) were independent risk factors associated with microinvasion. The nomogram incorporated the CUS and CEUS features achieved favorable discrimination (AUCs of 0.850, 0.848, and 0.879 for the training, internal and external validation datasets), with good calibration. The nomogram outperformed the CUS model and CEUS model (all P < .05). Decision curve analysis confirmed that the predictive nomogram was clinically useful.

Conclusion: The nomogram based on CUS and CEUS features showed promising predictive value for the preoperative identification of microinvasion in patients with DCIS.

使用传统超声结合对比度增强超声特征预测乳腺原位导管癌的微小浸润:一项双中心研究
背景:目的:开发并验证一种基于常规超声(CUS)和对比增强超声(CEUS)特征的模型,用于术前预测乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)的微小病灶:回顾性收集内部医院163名接受CUS和CEUS检查的DCIS患者的数据,并按7:3的比例随机分为训练集和内部验证集。外部验证集包括外部医院的 56 例 DCIS 患者。通过单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,确定与微小浸润相关的独立风险因素。这些因素被用于开发预测模型。通过校准、区分度和临床实用性对模型的性能进行了评估:多变量分析表明,CEUS 上向心性增强方向(几率比 [OR],13.268;95% 置信区间 [CI],3.687-47.746)和增强范围扩大(OR,4.876;95% CI,1.470-16.181)、病灶大小≥20 毫米(OR,3.265;95% CI,1.230-8.669)和 CUS 上检测到的钙化(OR,5.174;95% CI,1.903-14.066)是与微小病灶相关的独立危险因素。包含 CUS 和 CEUS 特征的提名图具有良好的区分度(训练、内部和外部验证数据集的 AUC 分别为 0.850、0.848 和 0.879)和校准性。提名图的表现优于 CUS 模型和 CEUS 模型(所有 P < .05)。决策曲线分析证实,预测提名图在临床上是有用的:基于CUS和CEUS特征的提名图对术前识别DCIS患者的微小病灶具有很好的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信