Identifying measures for understanding and addressing county-level disparities in adolescent HPV vaccination coverage in North Carolina.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Brigid K Grabert, Mary Catharine McKeithen, Justin G Trogdon, Lisa P Spees, Stephanie B Wheeler, Jenny K Myers, Jennifer C Spencer, Melissa B Gilkey
{"title":"Identifying measures for understanding and addressing county-level disparities in adolescent HPV vaccination coverage in North Carolina.","authors":"Brigid K Grabert, Mary Catharine McKeithen, Justin G Trogdon, Lisa P Spees, Stephanie B Wheeler, Jenny K Myers, Jennifer C Spencer, Melissa B Gilkey","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>HPV vaccination coverage is characterized by geographic disparities in the US, with national studies finding lower coverage in rural versus nonrural areas. To direct quality improvement efforts in North Carolina, we sought to understand how different rurality measures characterize these disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used separate negative binomial regression models to test associations between 5 dichotomized county-level rurality measures and HPV vaccination coverage (≥1 dose) among North Carolina adolescents, ages 11-12 (n=326,345). Rurality measures were derived from: Office of Management and Budget's Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Rural-Urban Continuum Codes, Index of Relative Rurality, US Census Bureau classifications, and North Carolina Rural Center classifications. Models controlled for Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) percentile and rate of pediatricians per county. Vaccination data came from the North Carolina Immunization Registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HPV vaccination coverage was 29% across North Carolina's 100 counties (range: 13%, 46%). Agreement between rurality measures ranged from 54% to 93% of counties. In adjusted analyses, none of the 5 rurality measures correlated with HPV vaccination coverage, but higher SVI and higher rate of pediatricians were positively associated with coverage (p< 0.01). Exploratory moderation analyses suggested regional variation in the relationship between rurality and coverage, with a positive association in one region, a negative association in one region, and no association in four regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>County-level rurality measures did not identify disparities in HPV vaccination coverage in North Carolina.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Measures related to social vulnerability and access to pediatricians may be better suited for understanding and addressing the state's substantial county-level vaccination disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1186","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: HPV vaccination coverage is characterized by geographic disparities in the US, with national studies finding lower coverage in rural versus nonrural areas. To direct quality improvement efforts in North Carolina, we sought to understand how different rurality measures characterize these disparities.

Methods: We used separate negative binomial regression models to test associations between 5 dichotomized county-level rurality measures and HPV vaccination coverage (≥1 dose) among North Carolina adolescents, ages 11-12 (n=326,345). Rurality measures were derived from: Office of Management and Budget's Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Rural-Urban Continuum Codes, Index of Relative Rurality, US Census Bureau classifications, and North Carolina Rural Center classifications. Models controlled for Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) percentile and rate of pediatricians per county. Vaccination data came from the North Carolina Immunization Registry.

Results: HPV vaccination coverage was 29% across North Carolina's 100 counties (range: 13%, 46%). Agreement between rurality measures ranged from 54% to 93% of counties. In adjusted analyses, none of the 5 rurality measures correlated with HPV vaccination coverage, but higher SVI and higher rate of pediatricians were positively associated with coverage (p< 0.01). Exploratory moderation analyses suggested regional variation in the relationship between rurality and coverage, with a positive association in one region, a negative association in one region, and no association in four regions.

Conclusions: County-level rurality measures did not identify disparities in HPV vaccination coverage in North Carolina.

Impact: Measures related to social vulnerability and access to pediatricians may be better suited for understanding and addressing the state's substantial county-level vaccination disparities.

确定了解和解决北卡罗来纳州青少年 HPV 疫苗接种覆盖率县级差距的措施。
背景:在美国,HPV 疫苗接种覆盖率存在地域差异,全国性研究发现农村地区的覆盖率低于非农村地区。为了指导北卡罗来纳州的质量改进工作,我们试图了解不同的农村地区衡量标准是如何描述这些差异的:我们使用了单独的负二项回归模型来检验北卡罗来纳州 11-12 岁青少年(n=326,345)中 5 个二分法县级农村测量值与 HPV 疫苗接种覆盖率(≥1 剂)之间的关联。乡镇化指标来源于:管理和预算办公室的大都市统计区、农村-城市连续代码、相对乡镇化指数、美国人口普查局分类以及北卡罗来纳州乡镇中心分类。模型控制了社会弱势指数 (SVI) 百分位数和每个县的儿科医生比例。疫苗接种数据来自北卡罗来纳州免疫登记处:北卡罗来纳州 100 个县的 HPV 疫苗接种覆盖率为 29%(范围:13%-46%)。各县之间的乡土性测量结果一致率从 54% 到 93% 不等。在调整后的分析中,5 个乡镇测量指标均与 HPV 疫苗接种覆盖率无关,但较高的 SVI 和较高的儿科医生比例与覆盖率呈正相关(p< 0.01)。探索性调节分析表明,乡土性与覆盖率之间的关系存在地区差异,一个地区呈正相关,一个地区呈负相关,四个地区无相关:结论:县级农村地区的衡量标准并不能确定北卡罗来纳州 HPV 疫苗接种覆盖率的差异:影响:与社会脆弱性和获得儿科医生服务相关的措施可能更适合用于了解和解决该州县级疫苗接种率的巨大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信