Delayed-and-abbreviated environmental enrichment after traumatic brain injury confers neurobehavioral benefits similar to immediate-and-continuous exposure

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Rachel A. Bittner , Anna M. Greene , Jacob B. Leary , Hailey M. Donald , Haley E. Capeci , Eleni H. Moschonas , Jeffrey P. Cheng , Corina O. Bondi , Anthony E. Kline
{"title":"Delayed-and-abbreviated environmental enrichment after traumatic brain injury confers neurobehavioral benefits similar to immediate-and-continuous exposure","authors":"Rachel A. Bittner ,&nbsp;Anna M. Greene ,&nbsp;Jacob B. Leary ,&nbsp;Hailey M. Donald ,&nbsp;Haley E. Capeci ,&nbsp;Eleni H. Moschonas ,&nbsp;Jeffrey P. Cheng ,&nbsp;Corina O. Bondi ,&nbsp;Anthony E. Kline","doi":"10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental enrichment (EE) consists of increased living space, complex stimuli, and social interaction that collectively confer neurobehavioral benefits in preclinical models of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The typical EE approach entails implementation immediately after surgery and continual exposure, which is not clinically applicable, as TBI patients often only receive rehabilitation after critical care, and then only for a few hours per day. We are focused on developing a clinically relevant model of neurorehabilitation by refining the timing of initiation and duration of EE exposure after TBI. The goal of this experiment is to compare the typical EE approach to paradigms where EE is delayed by 3 or 7 days after TBI and then provided for only 6 h per day, which better mimics the clinic. The hypothesis is that the delayed-and-abbreviated EE paradigms will promote neurobehavioral benefits like the typical approach of immediate-and-continuous exposure. To test the hypothesis, anesthetized adult male rats underwent a controlled cortical impact of moderate severity (2.8 mm deformation at 4 m/s) or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to post-operative EE or standard (STD) housing. Motor ability, spatial learning, and memory retention were assessed. The hypothesis was confirmed as all EE-treated groups performed better than the STD group in all behavioral assessments (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) and did not differ from one another (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). The ability of EE to provide significant behavioral benefits even when delayed and delivered in moderation affords further support for EE as a preclinical model of neurorehabilitation and offers greater insight into the length of the therapeutic window.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9083,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research","volume":"1846 ","pages":"Article 149281"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899324005353","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental enrichment (EE) consists of increased living space, complex stimuli, and social interaction that collectively confer neurobehavioral benefits in preclinical models of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The typical EE approach entails implementation immediately after surgery and continual exposure, which is not clinically applicable, as TBI patients often only receive rehabilitation after critical care, and then only for a few hours per day. We are focused on developing a clinically relevant model of neurorehabilitation by refining the timing of initiation and duration of EE exposure after TBI. The goal of this experiment is to compare the typical EE approach to paradigms where EE is delayed by 3 or 7 days after TBI and then provided for only 6 h per day, which better mimics the clinic. The hypothesis is that the delayed-and-abbreviated EE paradigms will promote neurobehavioral benefits like the typical approach of immediate-and-continuous exposure. To test the hypothesis, anesthetized adult male rats underwent a controlled cortical impact of moderate severity (2.8 mm deformation at 4 m/s) or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to post-operative EE or standard (STD) housing. Motor ability, spatial learning, and memory retention were assessed. The hypothesis was confirmed as all EE-treated groups performed better than the STD group in all behavioral assessments (p < 0.05) and did not differ from one another (p > 0.05). The ability of EE to provide significant behavioral benefits even when delayed and delivered in moderation affords further support for EE as a preclinical model of neurorehabilitation and offers greater insight into the length of the therapeutic window.
脑外伤后延迟和简短的环境丰富化与立即和持续的暴露对神经行为的益处相似。
丰富环境(EE)包括增加生活空间、复杂刺激和社交互动,这些因素共同为创伤性脑损伤(TBI)临床前模型的神经行为带来益处。典型的 EE 方法需要在手术后立即实施并持续暴露于环境中,这在临床上并不适用,因为创伤性脑损伤患者通常只能在重症监护后接受康复治疗,而且每天只能接受几个小时的康复治疗。我们的重点是通过改进创伤性脑损伤后开始 EE 的时间和持续时间,开发一种与临床相关的神经康复模式。本实验的目的是将典型的 EE 方法与延迟 3 天或 7 天,然后每天只提供 6 小时 EE 的范例进行比较,后者更能模拟临床。我们的假设是,延迟和简短的 EE 范例将促进神经行为的益处,就像典型的立即和持续暴露的方法一样。为了验证这一假设,麻醉后的成年雄性大鼠接受了中等严重程度(2.8 毫米变形,4 米/秒)的受控皮层冲击或假性损伤,然后被随机分配到术后 EE 或标准(STD)饲养室。对运动能力、空间学习能力和记忆保持能力进行了评估。假设得到了证实,所有 EE 治疗组在所有行为评估中的表现均优于 STD 组(P 0.05)。EE 即使在延迟和适度给药的情况下也能带来显著的行为益处,这进一步支持了将 EE 作为神经康复的临床前模型,并使人们对治疗窗口期的长度有了更深入的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Research
Brain Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
268
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: An international multidisciplinary journal devoted to fundamental research in the brain sciences. Brain Research publishes papers reporting interdisciplinary investigations of nervous system structure and function that are of general interest to the international community of neuroscientists. As is evident from the journals name, its scope is broad, ranging from cellular and molecular studies through systems neuroscience, cognition and disease. Invited reviews are also published; suggestions for and inquiries about potential reviews are welcomed. With the appearance of the final issue of the 2011 subscription, Vol. 67/1-2 (24 June 2011), Brain Research Reviews has ceased publication as a distinct journal separate from Brain Research. Review articles accepted for Brain Research are now published in that journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信