Artificial intelligence in traumatology.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Rosmarie Breu, Carolina Avelar, Zsolt Bertalan, Johannes Grillari, Heinz Redl, Richard Ljuhar, Stefan Quadlbauer, Thomas Hausner
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in traumatology.","authors":"Rosmarie Breu, Carolina Avelar, Zsolt Bertalan, Johannes Grillari, Heinz Redl, Richard Ljuhar, Stefan Quadlbauer, Thomas Hausner","doi":"10.1302/2046-3758.1310.BJR-2023-0275.R3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to create artificial intelligence (AI) software with the purpose of providing a second opinion to physicians to support distal radius fracture (DRF) detection, and to compare the accuracy of fracture detection of physicians with and without software support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The dataset consisted of 26,121 anonymized anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral standard view radiographs of the wrist, with and without DRF. The convolutional neural network (CNN) model was trained to detect the presence of a DRF by comparing the radiographs containing a fracture to the inconspicuous ones. A total of 11 physicians (six surgeons in training and five hand surgeons) assessed 200 pairs of randomly selected digital radiographs of the wrist (AP and lateral) for the presence of a DRF. The same images were first evaluated without, and then with, the support of the CNN model, and the diagnostic accuracy of the two methods was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the time of the study, the CNN model showed an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.97. AI assistance improved the physician's sensitivity (correct fracture detection) from 80% to 87%, and the specificity (correct fracture exclusion) from 91% to 95%. The overall error rate (combined false positive and false negative) was reduced from 14% without AI to 9% with AI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a CNN model as a second opinion can improve the diagnostic accuracy of DRF detection in the study setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9074,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Research","volume":"13 10","pages":"588-595"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.1310.BJR-2023-0275.R3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to create artificial intelligence (AI) software with the purpose of providing a second opinion to physicians to support distal radius fracture (DRF) detection, and to compare the accuracy of fracture detection of physicians with and without software support.

Methods: The dataset consisted of 26,121 anonymized anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral standard view radiographs of the wrist, with and without DRF. The convolutional neural network (CNN) model was trained to detect the presence of a DRF by comparing the radiographs containing a fracture to the inconspicuous ones. A total of 11 physicians (six surgeons in training and five hand surgeons) assessed 200 pairs of randomly selected digital radiographs of the wrist (AP and lateral) for the presence of a DRF. The same images were first evaluated without, and then with, the support of the CNN model, and the diagnostic accuracy of the two methods was compared.

Results: At the time of the study, the CNN model showed an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.97. AI assistance improved the physician's sensitivity (correct fracture detection) from 80% to 87%, and the specificity (correct fracture exclusion) from 91% to 95%. The overall error rate (combined false positive and false negative) was reduced from 14% without AI to 9% with AI.

Conclusion: The use of a CNN model as a second opinion can improve the diagnostic accuracy of DRF detection in the study setting.

创伤学中的人工智能。
目的:本研究旨在创建人工智能(AI)软件,为医生提供第二意见,以支持桡骨远端骨折(DRF)检测,并比较有软件支持和没有软件支持的医生的骨折检测准确性:数据集包括 26121 张匿名的腕关节前后位(AP)和侧位标准视图射线照片,包括有无桡骨远端骨折。对卷积神经网络(CNN)模型进行了训练,通过比较有骨折和无骨折的X光片来检测是否存在DRF。共有 11 名医生(其中 6 名外科医生正在接受培训,5 名手外科医生)对随机选取的 200 对腕部数字 X 光片(正侧位和侧位)进行了评估,以确定是否存在 DRF。首先在没有 CNN 模型支持的情况下评估相同的图像,然后在有 CNN 模型支持的情况下评估相同的图像,并比较两种方法的诊断准确性:研究结果表明,CNN 模型的接收器工作曲线下面积为 0.97。人工智能辅助将医生的灵敏度(正确的骨折检测)从 80% 提高到 87%,特异性(正确的骨折排除)从 91% 提高到 95%。总体错误率(假阳性和假阴性的总和)从无人工智能时的 14% 降至有人工智能时的 9%:结论:在研究环境中,使用 CNN 模型作为第二意见可提高 DRF 检测的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Research
Bone & Joint Research CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
23.90%
发文量
156
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The gold open access journal for the musculoskeletal sciences. Included in PubMed and available in PubMed Central.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信