Grief and coping among relatives of patients who died of COVID-19 in intensive care during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.741
Sancho Rodriguez-Villar, Elijah Oluwafemi Okegbola, Juan Arevalo-Serrano, Yasmine Duval, Annie Mathew, Carmen Rodriguez-Villar, Kirsten V Smith, Robert Charles Kennedy, Holly G Prigerson
{"title":"Grief and coping among relatives of patients who died of COVID-19 in intensive care during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Sancho Rodriguez-Villar, Elijah Oluwafemi Okegbola, Juan Arevalo-Serrano, Yasmine Duval, Annie Mathew, Carmen Rodriguez-Villar, Kirsten V Smith, Robert Charles Kennedy, Holly G Prigerson","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The grief of relatives of patients who died of COVID-19 in an intensive care unit (ICU) has exacted an enormous toll worldwide.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine the prevalence of probable prolonged grief disorder (PGD) at 12 months post-loss and beyond. We also sought to examine circumstances of the death during the COVID-19 pandemic that might pose a heightened risk of PGD, and the associations between probable PGD diagnosis, quality of life and social disconnection.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted an observational, cross-sectional multicentre study of the next of kin of those who died of COVID-19 between March 2020 and December 2021. Participants were recruited from ICUs in South-East London. The Prolonged Grief Disorder Scale (PG-13-R), Quality-of-Life Scale (QOLS) and Oxford Grief-Social Disconnection Scale (OG-SD) were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 73 relatives were recruited and assessed, all of them over a year after their loss. Twenty-five (34.2%; 95% CI 23.1-45.4%) relatives of patients who died in the ICU met the criteria for PGD. Those who met the criteria had significantly worse quality of life (QOLS score mean difference 26; 95% CI 17-34; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and endorsed greater social disconnection (OG-SD score means difference 41; 95% CI 27-54; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that rates of PGD are elevated among relatives of patients who died of COVID-19 in the ICU. This, coupled with worse quality of life and greater social disconnection experienced by those meeting the criteria, suggests the need to attend to the social deprivations and social dysfunctions of this population group.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"10 6","pages":"e181"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.741","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The grief of relatives of patients who died of COVID-19 in an intensive care unit (ICU) has exacted an enormous toll worldwide.

Aims: To determine the prevalence of probable prolonged grief disorder (PGD) at 12 months post-loss and beyond. We also sought to examine circumstances of the death during the COVID-19 pandemic that might pose a heightened risk of PGD, and the associations between probable PGD diagnosis, quality of life and social disconnection.

Method: We conducted an observational, cross-sectional multicentre study of the next of kin of those who died of COVID-19 between March 2020 and December 2021. Participants were recruited from ICUs in South-East London. The Prolonged Grief Disorder Scale (PG-13-R), Quality-of-Life Scale (QOLS) and Oxford Grief-Social Disconnection Scale (OG-SD) were used.

Results: A total of 73 relatives were recruited and assessed, all of them over a year after their loss. Twenty-five (34.2%; 95% CI 23.1-45.4%) relatives of patients who died in the ICU met the criteria for PGD. Those who met the criteria had significantly worse quality of life (QOLS score mean difference 26; 95% CI 17-34; P < 0.001) and endorsed greater social disconnection (OG-SD score means difference 41; 95% CI 27-54; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The findings suggest that rates of PGD are elevated among relatives of patients who died of COVID-19 in the ICU. This, coupled with worse quality of life and greater social disconnection experienced by those meeting the criteria, suggests the need to attend to the social deprivations and social dysfunctions of this population group.

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,在重症监护中死于 COVID-19 的病人亲属的悲伤与应对。
背景:目的:确定失去亲人后 12 个月及以后可能出现的长期悲伤障碍(PGD)的患病率。我们还试图研究 COVID-19 大流行期间可能会增加 PGD 风险的死亡情况,以及可能的 PGD 诊断、生活质量和社会脱节之间的关联:我们对 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 12 月期间死于 COVID-19 的患者的近亲进行了一项横断面多中心观察性研究。参与者来自伦敦东南部的重症监护室。研究采用了 "长期悲伤障碍量表(PG-13-R)"、"生活质量量表(QOLS)"和 "牛津悲伤-社会隔离量表(OG-SD)":共招募并评估了 73 名亲属,他们均在失去亲人一年以上。25名(34.2%;95% CI 23.1-45.4%)重症监护病房死亡患者的亲属符合PGD标准。符合标准者的生活质量明显较差(QOLS 评分均值差异为 26;95% CI 为 17-34;P <0.001),且与社会脱节程度更高(OG-SD 评分均值差异为 41;95% CI 为 27-54;P <0.001):研究结果表明,在重症监护室死于 COVID-19 的患者亲属中,PGD 患病率较高。这表明有必要关注这一人群的社会贫困和社会功能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信