What tools are available to assess climate and environmental health impacts on perinatal families with an equity lens? A rapid review of the Canadian context.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Alysha T Jones, Émilie Tremblay, Anne-Lise Costeux, Jacqueline Avanthay Strus, Adrienne Barcket
{"title":"What tools are available to assess climate and environmental health impacts on perinatal families with an equity lens? A rapid review of the Canadian context.","authors":"Alysha T Jones, Émilie Tremblay, Anne-Lise Costeux, Jacqueline Avanthay Strus, Adrienne Barcket","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06761-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This rapid review is designed to identify existing tools in the Canadian literature that assess the impacts of climate change on the health of perinatal families, particularly those who are equity-denied. Addressing the needs of equity-denied perinatal populations in the face of climate change is crucial to promoting equitable and inclusive perinatal care in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Rapid review methodology was selected to provide evidence in a timely and cost-effective manner. PubMed/MEDLINE and gray literature (Google and Google Scholar) were searched for English and French papers published from 2013 onward. The original research question, focused on climate change and health, yielded very few relevant results. Therefore, the search was broadened to include environmental health. Garrity et al.'s (J Clin Epidemiol 130:13-22, 2021) nine-stage process was used to identify 11 relevant papers, extract the relevant data, and complete the narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Synthesis: </strong>This review revealed a significant lack of tools for comprehensively assessing climate-health impacts on perinatal families and equity-denied perinatal families. While Canadian perinatal health screenings focus on equity via indicators of several social determinants of health (e.g., income, social support), they largely omit climate considerations. Environmental health factors are more commonly included but remain minimal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Climate-health screening tools are lacking yet needed in routine perinatal healthcare. Given the seriousness of climate change, urgent engagement of health systems and healthcare workers is essential to help mitigate and adapt to climate-health challenges, particularly for perinatal families experiencing health inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"24 1","pages":"680"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11490008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06761-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This rapid review is designed to identify existing tools in the Canadian literature that assess the impacts of climate change on the health of perinatal families, particularly those who are equity-denied. Addressing the needs of equity-denied perinatal populations in the face of climate change is crucial to promoting equitable and inclusive perinatal care in Canada.

Methods: Rapid review methodology was selected to provide evidence in a timely and cost-effective manner. PubMed/MEDLINE and gray literature (Google and Google Scholar) were searched for English and French papers published from 2013 onward. The original research question, focused on climate change and health, yielded very few relevant results. Therefore, the search was broadened to include environmental health. Garrity et al.'s (J Clin Epidemiol 130:13-22, 2021) nine-stage process was used to identify 11 relevant papers, extract the relevant data, and complete the narrative synthesis.

Synthesis: This review revealed a significant lack of tools for comprehensively assessing climate-health impacts on perinatal families and equity-denied perinatal families. While Canadian perinatal health screenings focus on equity via indicators of several social determinants of health (e.g., income, social support), they largely omit climate considerations. Environmental health factors are more commonly included but remain minimal.

Conclusion: Climate-health screening tools are lacking yet needed in routine perinatal healthcare. Given the seriousness of climate change, urgent engagement of health systems and healthcare workers is essential to help mitigate and adapt to climate-health challenges, particularly for perinatal families experiencing health inequities.

有哪些工具可用来从公平角度评估气候和环境对围产期家庭健康的影响?加拿大背景快速回顾。
目的:本快速综述旨在确定加拿大文献中评估气候变化对围产期家庭健康影响的现有工具,尤其是那些被剥夺了平等权利的家庭。面对气候变化,满足被剥夺公平的围产期人群的需求对于促进加拿大围产期护理的公平性和包容性至关重要:方法:选择了快速审查方法,以便及时、经济高效地提供证据。我们检索了 PubMed/MEDLINE 和灰色文献(谷歌和谷歌学术)中 2013 年以来发表的英文和法文论文。最初的研究问题侧重于气候变化与健康,但相关结果寥寥无几。因此,搜索范围扩大到环境健康。Garrity 等人(J Clin Epidemiol 130:13-22,2021 年)采用九阶段流程确定了 11 篇相关论文,提取了相关数据,并完成了叙述性综述:综述:本综述显示,全面评估气候健康对围产期家庭和被剥夺公平的围产期家庭的影响的工具非常缺乏。虽然加拿大围产期健康筛查通过健康的几个社会决定因素(如收入、社会支持)的指标来关注公平性,但它们在很大程度上忽略了气候因素。环境健康因素被纳入其中的情况较为普遍,但仍然很少:结论:常规围产期医疗保健中缺乏气候健康筛查工具,但这是必要的。鉴于气候变化的严重性,医疗系统和医疗工作者的紧急参与对于帮助减轻和适应气候健康挑战至关重要,尤其是对于经历健康不平等的围产期家庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信