Mapping the scientific literature on obstetric and perinatal health among sexual and gender minoritized (SGM) childbearing people and their infants: a scoping review.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Aimee K Huang, Alison R Schulte, Mary-Frances E Hall, Laura Y Chen, Sanjana Srinivasan, Carol Mita, Aava B Jahan, Kodiak R S Soled, Brittany M Charlton
{"title":"Mapping the scientific literature on obstetric and perinatal health among sexual and gender minoritized (SGM) childbearing people and their infants: a scoping review.","authors":"Aimee K Huang, Alison R Schulte, Mary-Frances E Hall, Laura Y Chen, Sanjana Srinivasan, Carol Mita, Aava B Jahan, Kodiak R S Soled, Brittany M Charlton","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06813-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence suggests sexual and gender minoritized (SGM) childbearing individuals and their infants experience more adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes compared to their cisgender, heterosexual counterparts. This study aimed to comprehensively map obstetric and perinatal physical health literature among SGM populations and their infants and identify knowledge gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science Core Collection were systematically searched to identify published studies reporting obstetric and perinatal outcomes in SGM individuals or their infants. Study characteristics, sample characteristics, and outcome findings were systematically extracted and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 8,740 records; 55 studies (1981-2023) were included. Sexual orientation was measured by self-identification (72%), behavior (55%), and attraction (9%). Only one study captured all three dimensions. Inconsistent measures of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) were common, and 68% conflated sex and gender. Most (85%) focused on sexual minorities, while 31% addressed gender minorities. Demographic measures employed varied widely and were inconsistent; 35% lacked race/ethnicity data, and 44% lacked socioeconomic data. Most studies (78%) examined outcomes among SGM individuals, primarily focusing on morbidity and pregnancy outcomes. Pregnancy termination was most frequently studied, while pregnancy and childbirth complications (e.g., gestational hypertension, postpartum hemorrhage) were rarely examined. Evidence of disparities were mixed. Infant outcomes were investigated in 60% of the studies, focusing on preterm birth and low birthweight. Disparities were noted among different sexual orientation and racial/ethnic groups. Qualitative insights highlighted how stigma and discriminatory care settings can lead to adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frequent conflation of sex and gender and a lack of standardized SOGI measures hinder the comparison and synthesis of existing evidence. Nuanced sociodemographic data should be collected to understand the implications of intersecting identities. Findings on perinatal health disparities were mixed, highlighting the need for standardized SOGI measures and comprehensive sociodemographic data. The impact of stigma and discriminatory care on adverse outcomes underscores the need for inclusive healthcare environments. Future research should address these gaps; research on SGM perinatal outcomes remains urgently lacking.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The review protocol was developed a priori in February 2023, registered on Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5DQV4 ) and published in BMJ Open ( https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/11/e075443 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06813-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence suggests sexual and gender minoritized (SGM) childbearing individuals and their infants experience more adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes compared to their cisgender, heterosexual counterparts. This study aimed to comprehensively map obstetric and perinatal physical health literature among SGM populations and their infants and identify knowledge gaps.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science Core Collection were systematically searched to identify published studies reporting obstetric and perinatal outcomes in SGM individuals or their infants. Study characteristics, sample characteristics, and outcome findings were systematically extracted and analyzed.

Results: Our search yielded 8,740 records; 55 studies (1981-2023) were included. Sexual orientation was measured by self-identification (72%), behavior (55%), and attraction (9%). Only one study captured all three dimensions. Inconsistent measures of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) were common, and 68% conflated sex and gender. Most (85%) focused on sexual minorities, while 31% addressed gender minorities. Demographic measures employed varied widely and were inconsistent; 35% lacked race/ethnicity data, and 44% lacked socioeconomic data. Most studies (78%) examined outcomes among SGM individuals, primarily focusing on morbidity and pregnancy outcomes. Pregnancy termination was most frequently studied, while pregnancy and childbirth complications (e.g., gestational hypertension, postpartum hemorrhage) were rarely examined. Evidence of disparities were mixed. Infant outcomes were investigated in 60% of the studies, focusing on preterm birth and low birthweight. Disparities were noted among different sexual orientation and racial/ethnic groups. Qualitative insights highlighted how stigma and discriminatory care settings can lead to adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes.

Conclusions: Frequent conflation of sex and gender and a lack of standardized SOGI measures hinder the comparison and synthesis of existing evidence. Nuanced sociodemographic data should be collected to understand the implications of intersecting identities. Findings on perinatal health disparities were mixed, highlighting the need for standardized SOGI measures and comprehensive sociodemographic data. The impact of stigma and discriminatory care on adverse outcomes underscores the need for inclusive healthcare environments. Future research should address these gaps; research on SGM perinatal outcomes remains urgently lacking.

Trial registration: The review protocol was developed a priori in February 2023, registered on Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5DQV4 ) and published in BMJ Open ( https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/11/e075443 ).

性与性别少数群体(SGM)育龄者及其婴儿的产科和围产期健康科学文献图谱:范围界定审查。
背景:有证据表明,与同性异性相比,性行为和性别上属于少数群体(SGM)的育龄个体及其婴儿会经历更多不利的产科和围产期结果。本研究旨在全面了解 SGM 群体及其婴儿的产科和围产期身体健康文献,并找出知识差距:对 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL 和 Web of Science Core Collection 进行了系统检索,以确定报道 SGM 患者或其婴儿产科和围产期结果的已发表研究。系统地提取并分析了研究特征、样本特征和结果:我们的搜索共获得 8740 条记录,其中包括 55 项研究(1981-2023 年)。性取向通过自我认同(72%)、行为(55%)和吸引力(9%)来衡量。只有一项研究涵盖了所有三个方面。对性取向和性别认同(SOGI)的测量不一致的情况很普遍,68%的研究将性和性别混为一谈。大多数研究(85%)关注的是性取向少数群体,而 31% 的研究关注的是性别少数群体。采用的人口统计学测量方法差异很大,而且不一致;35% 的研究缺乏种族/族裔数据,44% 的研究缺乏社会经济数据。大多数研究(78%)对 SGM 患者的结果进行了调查,主要集中在发病率和妊娠结果上。对终止妊娠的研究最多,而对妊娠和分娩并发症(如妊娠高血压、产后出血)的研究则很少。有关差异的证据参差不齐。60% 的研究对婴儿的结局进行了调查,重点是早产和出生体重不足。不同性取向和种族/民族群体之间存在差异。定性分析强调了污名化和歧视性护理环境如何导致不良的妊娠和分娩结果:结论:性和性别经常被混淆,而且缺乏标准化的社会性别平等衡量标准,这些都阻碍了对现有证据的比较和综合。应收集细致入微的社会人口数据,以了解交叉身份的影响。关于围产期健康差异的研究结果喜忧参半,这凸显了标准化的社会性别平等测量方法和全面的社会人口数据的必要性。污名化和歧视性护理对不良后果的影响强调了包容性医疗环境的必要性。未来的研究应弥补这些不足;有关SGM围产期结局的研究仍然十分缺乏:该综述方案于 2023 年 2 月事先制定,在开放科学框架 ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5DQV4 ) 上注册,并在 BMJ Open ( https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/11/e075443 ) 上发表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信