Probiotics, tetracycline fibres and chlorhexidine gel's effectiveness in treating chronic periodontitis as a supplement to scaling and root planning.

IF 1.9
Bioinformation Pub Date : 2024-08-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.6026/973206300200933
Abhigyan Manas, Jnana Ranjan Swain, Shivani Ambadas Kantale, Narayane R, Jeevan Prakash S, Pavithra Rangarajan Seshadri, Sabiha Kouser Ms, Upasana Tyagi
{"title":"Probiotics, tetracycline fibres and chlorhexidine gel's effectiveness in treating chronic periodontitis as a supplement to scaling and root planning.","authors":"Abhigyan Manas, Jnana Ranjan Swain, Shivani Ambadas Kantale, Narayane R, Jeevan Prakash S, Pavithra Rangarajan Seshadri, Sabiha Kouser Ms, Upasana Tyagi","doi":"10.6026/973206300200933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A periodontal pocket can result into progressive loss of attachment. Many agents are tried to improve periodontal health. Hence this research was done to estimate the effectiveness of Tetracycline fibers; Probiotics and Chlorhexidine gel as a conjunction to scaling and root planning (SRP) in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. In all, 60 patients between the ages of 25 and 35 who had generalized chronic periodontitis and had a probing pocket depth (PPD) of at least 5 mm were enrolled for this study. Four groups of 15 patients each were created from the patients: Group 1: Tetracycline fibres after SRP, Group 2: Chlorhexidine gel, Group 3: Probiotic mouthwash and Group 4: Rinse with regular saline. At baseline, oral prophylaxis was administered to all groups. Gingival index (GI), Plaque index (PI), and probing depth (PD), among other clinical indicators, were evaluated at baseline, two weeks, and four weeks, respectively. All clinical findings, along withPlaque index (PI), Gingival index (GI), and Probing depth at various time intervals, decreased statistically significantly. Tetracycline fibres, Chlorhexidine gel, and probiotic mouthwash are all similarly effective for treating chronic periodontitis, but they are all more effective than SRP alone, according to an intergroup comparison. When it comes to SRP, local medication delivery methods are beneficial in treating periodontitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8962,"journal":{"name":"Bioinformation","volume":"20 8","pages":"933-937"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471413/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300200933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A periodontal pocket can result into progressive loss of attachment. Many agents are tried to improve periodontal health. Hence this research was done to estimate the effectiveness of Tetracycline fibers; Probiotics and Chlorhexidine gel as a conjunction to scaling and root planning (SRP) in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. In all, 60 patients between the ages of 25 and 35 who had generalized chronic periodontitis and had a probing pocket depth (PPD) of at least 5 mm were enrolled for this study. Four groups of 15 patients each were created from the patients: Group 1: Tetracycline fibres after SRP, Group 2: Chlorhexidine gel, Group 3: Probiotic mouthwash and Group 4: Rinse with regular saline. At baseline, oral prophylaxis was administered to all groups. Gingival index (GI), Plaque index (PI), and probing depth (PD), among other clinical indicators, were evaluated at baseline, two weeks, and four weeks, respectively. All clinical findings, along withPlaque index (PI), Gingival index (GI), and Probing depth at various time intervals, decreased statistically significantly. Tetracycline fibres, Chlorhexidine gel, and probiotic mouthwash are all similarly effective for treating chronic periodontitis, but they are all more effective than SRP alone, according to an intergroup comparison. When it comes to SRP, local medication delivery methods are beneficial in treating periodontitis.

益生菌、四环素纤维和洗必泰凝胶治疗慢性牙周炎的效果,作为洗牙和牙根规划的补充。
牙周袋会导致附着力逐渐丧失。许多药物都被用来改善牙周健康。因此,本研究评估了四环素纤维、益生菌和洗必泰凝胶作为洗牙和根管治疗(SRP)的辅助药物在治疗慢性牙周炎中的效果。共有 60 名年龄在 25 至 35 岁之间、患有全身慢性牙周炎且探诊袋深度(PPD)至少为 5 毫米的患者参与了这项研究。这些患者分为四组,每组 15 人:第 1 组:在 SRP 后使用四环素纤维;第 2 组:使用氯己定凝胶;第 3 组:在 SRP 后使用四环素纤维:氯己定凝胶;第 3 组:益生菌漱口水;第 4 组:用普通生理盐水漱口。基线时,所有组均进行了口腔预防。分别在基线、两周和四周时对牙龈指数(GI)、牙菌斑指数(PI)和探诊深度(PD)等临床指标进行评估。所有临床结果以及不同时间间隔的牙菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)和探诊深度在统计学上都有显著下降。根据组间比较,四环素纤维、洗必泰凝胶和益生菌漱口水对治疗慢性牙周炎都有类似的效果,但它们都比单独使用 SRP 更有效。就 SRP 而言,局部给药方法有利于治疗牙周炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioinformation
Bioinformation MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信