Does Early Continuous Passive Motion Improves Effectiveness of Physical Therapy After Arthroscopic Release of Elbow Contracture: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
M M Lihua Huang, Yanmao Wang, Yanhong Ma, Jian Ding, Shengdi Lu
{"title":"Does Early Continuous Passive Motion Improves Effectiveness of Physical Therapy After Arthroscopic Release of Elbow Contracture: A Prospective Randomized Trial.","authors":"M M Lihua Huang, Yanmao Wang, Yanhong Ma, Jian Ding, Shengdi Lu","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of early continuous passive motion combined with physical therapy compared to physical therapy alone as the rehabilitation protocol after the release of elbow contracture.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, 61 patients were randomly assigned to two groups (31 in the early continuous passive motion with physical therapy group vs. 30 in the physical therapy group). The patients received rehabilitation with or without early continuous passive motion for 4 weeks and were followed up for 6 months. The outcome measures were the range of motion and Mayo Elbow Performance Score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The early continuous passive motion with physical therapy group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in range of motion and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score compared with the physical therapy group at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. These differences were not observed in the stability subscale of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score at any of the assessed time points, nor in its pain subscale at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with physical therapy alone, early continuous passive motion combined with physical therapy enabled a quicker recovery of functional elbow motion and early pain control within the 6-month follow-up after arthroscopic release of elbow contracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002646","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of early continuous passive motion combined with physical therapy compared to physical therapy alone as the rehabilitation protocol after the release of elbow contracture.

Design: In this randomized controlled trial, 61 patients were randomly assigned to two groups (31 in the early continuous passive motion with physical therapy group vs. 30 in the physical therapy group). The patients received rehabilitation with or without early continuous passive motion for 4 weeks and were followed up for 6 months. The outcome measures were the range of motion and Mayo Elbow Performance Score.

Results: The early continuous passive motion with physical therapy group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in range of motion and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score compared with the physical therapy group at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. These differences were not observed in the stability subscale of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score at any of the assessed time points, nor in its pain subscale at 6 months.

Conclusion: Compared with physical therapy alone, early continuous passive motion combined with physical therapy enabled a quicker recovery of functional elbow motion and early pain control within the 6-month follow-up after arthroscopic release of elbow contracture.

关节镜下肘关节挛缩松解术后,早期持续被动运动是否能提高物理治疗的效果?前瞻性随机试验。
目的研究早期持续被动运动联合物理治疗与单独物理治疗作为肘关节挛缩松解后康复方案的有效性:在这项随机对照试验中,61名患者被随机分配到两组(早期持续被动运动与物理治疗组31人与物理治疗组30人)。患者接受为期4周的康复治疗,并随访6个月。研究结果以活动范围和梅奥肘关节表现评分为衡量标准:结果:与物理治疗组相比,早期持续被动运动配合物理治疗组在术后6周、3个月和6个月的活动范围和梅奥肘关节表现评分方面均有统计学意义上的显著改善。在任何一个评估时间点,梅奥肘关节表现评分的稳定性分量表均未观察到这些差异,6 个月时的疼痛分量表也未观察到这些差异:结论:与单纯物理治疗相比,早期持续被动运动结合物理治疗能更快地恢复肘关节功能运动,并在关节镜下肘关节挛缩松解术后6个月的随访中尽早控制疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信