Risk factors for postoperative delirium in adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2024-09-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/TXAC6999
Wanmin Pei, Huiling Tan, Tinghui Dai, Jian Liu, Yixun Tang, Jitong Liu
{"title":"Risk factors for postoperative delirium in adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery.","authors":"Wanmin Pei, Huiling Tan, Tinghui Dai, Jian Liu, Yixun Tang, Jitong Liu","doi":"10.62347/TXAC6999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify risk factors for postoperative delirium in adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of 214 patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass at the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University from January 2022 to January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the occurrence of postoperative delirium, patients were divided into a delirium group (49 cases) and a non-delirium group (165 cases). Outcome measures, including clinical baseline data, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), preoperative Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, anesthesia duration, surgery duration, aortic cross-clamp duration, intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP), intraoperative blood loss, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, postoperative mechanical ventilation duration, as well as postoperative MAP, were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the potential factors associated with post-operative delirium in patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the included 214 patients, 49 patients experienced delirium, resulting in an incidence of 22.90%. The delirium group had significantly lower LVEF and significantly higher APACHE II scores compared to the non-delirium group (all P<0.001). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of anesthesia duration, surgery duration, aortic cross-clamp duration, intraoperative MAP, and intraoperative blood loss (all P>0.05). The delirium group experienced significantly longer length of ICU stay and postoperative mechanical ventilation duration as compared to the non-delirium group (all P<0.001), but no significant difference was observed in terms of postoperative MAP between the two groups (P>0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified preoperative New York Heart Association classification (NYHA) (OR: 6.755, 95% CI: 2.529-18.039, P<0.001), preoperative LVEF (OR: 6.886, 95% CI: 2.383-19.899, P<0.001), preoperative APACHE II score (OR: 7.788, 95% CI: 2.740-22.135, P<0.001), length of ICU stay (OR: 9.463, 95% CI: 3.563-25.135, P<0.001), and postoperative mechanical ventilation duration (OR: 9.744, 95% CI: 3.419-27.768, P<0.001) as independent factors influencing the occurrence of delirium in adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postoperative delirium is a prevalent complication among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Independent risk factors for postoperative delirium in adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass during cardiac surgery include preoperative NYHA class III or IV, lower LVEF, higher APACHE II score, an extended length of stay in the ICU, and prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"16 9","pages":"4751-4760"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11470328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/TXAC6999","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify risk factors for postoperative delirium in adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.

Methods: The medical records of 214 patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass at the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University from January 2022 to January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the occurrence of postoperative delirium, patients were divided into a delirium group (49 cases) and a non-delirium group (165 cases). Outcome measures, including clinical baseline data, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), preoperative Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, anesthesia duration, surgery duration, aortic cross-clamp duration, intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP), intraoperative blood loss, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, postoperative mechanical ventilation duration, as well as postoperative MAP, were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the potential factors associated with post-operative delirium in patients.

Results: Of the included 214 patients, 49 patients experienced delirium, resulting in an incidence of 22.90%. The delirium group had significantly lower LVEF and significantly higher APACHE II scores compared to the non-delirium group (all P<0.001). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of anesthesia duration, surgery duration, aortic cross-clamp duration, intraoperative MAP, and intraoperative blood loss (all P>0.05). The delirium group experienced significantly longer length of ICU stay and postoperative mechanical ventilation duration as compared to the non-delirium group (all P<0.001), but no significant difference was observed in terms of postoperative MAP between the two groups (P>0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified preoperative New York Heart Association classification (NYHA) (OR: 6.755, 95% CI: 2.529-18.039, P<0.001), preoperative LVEF (OR: 6.886, 95% CI: 2.383-19.899, P<0.001), preoperative APACHE II score (OR: 7.788, 95% CI: 2.740-22.135, P<0.001), length of ICU stay (OR: 9.463, 95% CI: 3.563-25.135, P<0.001), and postoperative mechanical ventilation duration (OR: 9.744, 95% CI: 3.419-27.768, P<0.001) as independent factors influencing the occurrence of delirium in adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.

Conclusion: Postoperative delirium is a prevalent complication among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Independent risk factors for postoperative delirium in adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass during cardiac surgery include preoperative NYHA class III or IV, lower LVEF, higher APACHE II score, an extended length of stay in the ICU, and prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation duration.

心脏手术中接受心肺旁路术的成年患者术后谵妄的风险因素。
目的:确定接受心肺搭桥术的成年患者术后谵妄的风险因素:确定接受心肺搭桥术的成人患者术后谵妄的风险因素:回顾性分析 2022 年 1 月至 2024 年 1 月期间在湖南师范大学第一附属医院接受心肺搭桥术的 214 例患者的病历。根据术后谵妄的发生情况,将患者分为谵妄组(49例)和非谵妄组(165例)。对两组患者的临床基线数据、术前左心室射血分数(LVEF)、术前急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II(APACHE II)评分、麻醉持续时间、手术持续时间、主动脉交叉钳夹持续时间、术中平均动脉压(MAP)、术中失血量、重症监护室(ICU)住院时间、术后机械通气持续时间以及术后 MAP 等结果进行了比较。为确定与患者术后谵妄相关的潜在因素,进行了逻辑回归分析:结果:在纳入的 214 名患者中,49 名患者出现了谵妄,发生率为 22.90%。与非谵妄组相比,谵妄组的 LVEF 明显降低,APACHE II 评分明显升高(均为 P0.05)。与非谵妄组相比,谵妄组的重症监护室住院时间和术后机械通气时间明显更长(均为P0.05)。逻辑回归分析确定了术前纽约心脏协会分级(NYHA)(OR:6.755,95% CI:2.529-18.039,PC结论:术后谵妄是心脏手术患者普遍存在的一种并发症。在心脏手术中接受心肺旁路术的成人患者术后谵妄的独立风险因素包括术前 NYHA 分级 III 级或 IV 级、LVEF 较低、APACHE II 评分较高、在重症监护室住院时间较长以及术后机械通气时间较长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信