Leaf mass per area: An investigation into the application of the ubiquitous functional trait from a paleobotanical perspective

IF 2.4 2区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Matthew J. Butrim, Alexander J. Lowe, Ellen D. Currano
{"title":"Leaf mass per area: An investigation into the application of the ubiquitous functional trait from a paleobotanical perspective","authors":"Matthew J. Butrim,&nbsp;Alexander J. Lowe,&nbsp;Ellen D. Currano","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.16419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>Leaf mass per area (LMA) is a widely used functional trait in both neobotanical and paleobotanical research that provides a window into how plants interact with their environment. Paleobotanists have used site-level measures of LMA as a proxy for climate, biome, deciduousness, and community-scale plant strategy, yet many of these relationships have not been grounded in modern data. In this study, we evaluated LMA from the paleobotanical perspective, seeking to add modern context to paleobotanical interpretations and discover what a combined modern and fossil data set can tell us about how LMA can be best applied toward interpreting plant communities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We built a modern data set by pulling plant trait data from the TRY database, and a fossil data set by compiling data from studies that have used the petiole-width proxy for LMA. We then investigated the relationships of species-mean, site-mean, and site-distribution LMA with different climatic, phylogenetic, and physiognomic variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found that LMA distributions are correlated with climate, site taxonomic composition, and deciduousness. However, the relative contributions of these factors are not distinctive, and ultimately, LMA distributions cannot accurately reconstruct the biome or climate of an individual site.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The correlations that make up the leaf economics spectrum are stronger than the correlations between LMA and climate, phylogeny, morphospace, or depositional environment. Fossil LMA should be understood as the culmination of the influences of these variables rather than as a predictor.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":"111 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.16419","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Premise

Leaf mass per area (LMA) is a widely used functional trait in both neobotanical and paleobotanical research that provides a window into how plants interact with their environment. Paleobotanists have used site-level measures of LMA as a proxy for climate, biome, deciduousness, and community-scale plant strategy, yet many of these relationships have not been grounded in modern data. In this study, we evaluated LMA from the paleobotanical perspective, seeking to add modern context to paleobotanical interpretations and discover what a combined modern and fossil data set can tell us about how LMA can be best applied toward interpreting plant communities.

Methods

We built a modern data set by pulling plant trait data from the TRY database, and a fossil data set by compiling data from studies that have used the petiole-width proxy for LMA. We then investigated the relationships of species-mean, site-mean, and site-distribution LMA with different climatic, phylogenetic, and physiognomic variables.

Results

We found that LMA distributions are correlated with climate, site taxonomic composition, and deciduousness. However, the relative contributions of these factors are not distinctive, and ultimately, LMA distributions cannot accurately reconstruct the biome or climate of an individual site.

Conclusions

The correlations that make up the leaf economics spectrum are stronger than the correlations between LMA and climate, phylogeny, morphospace, or depositional environment. Fossil LMA should be understood as the culmination of the influences of these variables rather than as a predictor.

单位面积的叶片质量:从古植物学角度研究无处不在的功能特性的应用。
前言:单位面积叶片质量(LMA)是新植物学和古植物学研究中广泛使用的一种功能特征,它为了解植物如何与环境相互作用提供了一个窗口。古植物学家已经使用地点水平的 LMA 测量值来代表气候、生物群落、落叶性和群落规模的植物策略,但其中的许多关系还没有现代数据作为基础。在这项研究中,我们从古植物学的角度对LMA进行了评估,试图为古植物学的解释增加现代背景,并发现现代数据集和化石数据集的结合可以告诉我们如何将LMA最好地用于解释植物群落:我们通过从 TRY 数据库中提取植物性状数据来建立现代数据集,并通过汇编使用叶柄宽度替代 LMA 的研究数据来建立化石数据集。然后,我们研究了物种平均值、地点平均值和地点分布的 LMA 与不同气候、系统发育和生理特征变量之间的关系:结果:我们发现LMA分布与气候、地点分类组成和落叶性相关。然而,这些因素的相对贡献并不明显,最终,LMA分布无法准确重建单个地点的生物群落或气候:结论:叶片经济学谱系的相关性强于 LMA 与气候、系统发育、形态空间或沉积环境之间的相关性。化石 LMA 应被理解为这些变量影响的顶点,而不是预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Botany
American Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
171
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信