Persistent carbapenem resistance in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: A before-and-after analysis of the COVID-19 surge.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Bianca B P Antunes, Leonardo S L Bastos, Pedro Kurtz, Letícia M Sant'Anna, Pedro F Del Peloso, Claudia A Espanha, Silvio Hamacher, Fernando A Bozza
{"title":"Persistent carbapenem resistance in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: A before-and-after analysis of the COVID-19 surge.","authors":"Bianca B P Antunes, Leonardo S L Bastos, Pedro Kurtz, Letícia M Sant'Anna, Pedro F Del Peloso, Claudia A Espanha, Silvio Hamacher, Fernando A Bozza","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2024.10.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>How did the antimicrobial resistance profile of critically ill patients evolve before, during, and after COVID-19 surge periods?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed all critically ill mechanically ventilated adult patients admitted to eight Brazilian hospitals from January 1st, 2018, to April 30th, 2023. We stratified the patients into three periods based on their admission date: pre-surge (Jan 01/2018-Mar 01/2020), surge (Mar 01/2020 - Oct 01/2021), and post-surge (after Oct 01/2021). We compared the proportion of positive cultures, prevalence of pathogens, and resistance rates across periods using the rate ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analysed 9,780 ICU patients: 3,718 were in the pre-surge, 3,815 in the surge, and 2,247 in the post-surge period. Patients in the surge period were younger (median: 70 vs. 74 pre-surge vs. 75 post-surge) and presented a higher duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (median 7 vs. 5 days). The utilisation of blood and respiratory cultures increased throughout periods (56.9 pre-surge vs. 69.4 surge vs. 70.4 patients/1,000 patient days post-surge). The isolation of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria increased during the surge (RR [95% CI]: 1.8 [1.5-2.2], compared to pre-surge), decreased in post-surge (RR [95% CI]: 0.72 [0.6-0.9], and remained higher than pre-surge (RR [95% CI]: 1.3 [1.0-1.6]). Resistance rates for Pseudomonas aeruginosa reduced from 32% in pre- to 23% post-surge, whereas Klebsiella pneumoniae doubled during the surge, 26% to 52%, and remained higher than pre-surge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Carbapenem resistance increased during the surge period. Although it decreased post-surge, it remained higher than the rates observed before the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2024.10.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: How did the antimicrobial resistance profile of critically ill patients evolve before, during, and after COVID-19 surge periods?

Methods: We retrospectively analysed all critically ill mechanically ventilated adult patients admitted to eight Brazilian hospitals from January 1st, 2018, to April 30th, 2023. We stratified the patients into three periods based on their admission date: pre-surge (Jan 01/2018-Mar 01/2020), surge (Mar 01/2020 - Oct 01/2021), and post-surge (after Oct 01/2021). We compared the proportion of positive cultures, prevalence of pathogens, and resistance rates across periods using the rate ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results: We analysed 9,780 ICU patients: 3,718 were in the pre-surge, 3,815 in the surge, and 2,247 in the post-surge period. Patients in the surge period were younger (median: 70 vs. 74 pre-surge vs. 75 post-surge) and presented a higher duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (median 7 vs. 5 days). The utilisation of blood and respiratory cultures increased throughout periods (56.9 pre-surge vs. 69.4 surge vs. 70.4 patients/1,000 patient days post-surge). The isolation of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria increased during the surge (RR [95% CI]: 1.8 [1.5-2.2], compared to pre-surge), decreased in post-surge (RR [95% CI]: 0.72 [0.6-0.9], and remained higher than pre-surge (RR [95% CI]: 1.3 [1.0-1.6]). Resistance rates for Pseudomonas aeruginosa reduced from 32% in pre- to 23% post-surge, whereas Klebsiella pneumoniae doubled during the surge, 26% to 52%, and remained higher than pre-surge.

Conclusion: Carbapenem resistance increased during the surge period. Although it decreased post-surge, it remained higher than the rates observed before the pandemic.

机械通气 ICU 患者对碳青霉烯耐药性的持续存在:COVID-19 浪潮前后的分析。
目的:在 COVID-19 高峰期之前、期间和之后,重症患者的抗菌药物耐药性概况是如何演变的?我们对 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 4 月 30 日期间巴西八家医院收治的所有重症机械通气成人患者进行了回顾性分析。我们根据患者的入院日期将其分为三个时期:疫情激增前(2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 1 日)、疫情激增(2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 1 日)和疫情激增后(2021 年 10 月 1 日之后)。我们使用比率比 (RR) 及其 95% 置信区间 (95% CI) 比较了不同时期的阳性培养物比例、病原体流行率和耐药率:我们分析了 9780 名重症监护病房患者:其中,3718 人在疫情激增前,3815 人在疫情激增期间,2247 人在疫情激增后。激增期的患者年龄更小(中位数:激增前 70 岁对激增后 74 岁),有创机械通气时间更长(中位数 7 天对 5 天)。血液和呼吸道培养的使用率在各个时期都有所上升(骚乱前 56.9 对骚乱后 69.4 对 70.4/1,000)。耐碳青霉烯革兰阴性菌的分离率在疫情激增期间有所增加(RR [95% CI]:1.8 [1.5-2.2],与疫情激增前相比),在疫情激增后有所下降(RR [95% CI]:0.72 [0.6-0.8],与疫情激增前相比):[95%CI]:1.3 [1.0-1.6])。铜绿假单胞菌的耐药率从疫情激增前的 32% 降至疫情激增后的 23%,而肺炎克雷伯菌的耐药率在疫情激增期间翻了一番,从 26% 升至 52%,并且仍高于疫情激增前:结论:卡巴培南耐药性在疫情激增期间有所增加。结论:卡巴培南耐药性在疫情激增期间有所上升,虽然在疫情激增后有所下降,但仍高于大流行前的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信