Efficacy and Safety of Advanced Therapies in Moderately-to-Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Axel Dignass, Claire Ainsworth, Susanne Hartz, Niels Dunnewind, Isabel Redondo, Christophe Sapin, Sonja Kroep, Nicholas Halfpenny, Emanuele Arcà, Sami Hoque
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Advanced Therapies in Moderately-to-Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis","authors":"Axel Dignass,&nbsp;Claire Ainsworth,&nbsp;Susanne Hartz,&nbsp;Niels Dunnewind,&nbsp;Isabel Redondo,&nbsp;Christophe Sapin,&nbsp;Sonja Kroep,&nbsp;Nicholas Halfpenny,&nbsp;Emanuele Arcà,&nbsp;Sami Hoque","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-03003-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of biologics and small molecules for treatment of adults with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials evaluating approved and emerging targeted therapies for patients with UC. A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) approach was applied. Outcomes assessed included clinical response and remission, endoscopic mucosal healing, and safety.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty studies were included in the NMA following a feasibility assessment comparing approved induction dosing regimens and 22 studies comparing approved maintenance dosing regimens. In the biologic/Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi)-naïve population, induction studies showed similar clinical response and remission rates across most interventions, with upadacitinib demonstrating significant improvements versus most other interventions. For maintenance studies, mirikizumab demonstrated significant improvements in clinical response and remission versus most other interventions. In the biologic/JAKi-experienced population, no significant differences were observed between most interventions in induction studies, except for significantly improved clinical response and remission for mirikizumab versus adalimumab, and upadacitinib demonstrated significant improvement versus all other interventions. Few differences between active treatments were observed in maintenance studies. In both populations, all active interventions had similar efficacy in terms of endoscopic mucosal healing in both induction and maintenance studies. Regardless of prior treatment exposure, similar rates of serious adverse events were seen across all active interventions in the induction period.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Among the available interventions, owing to its favourable efficacy and safety profile, mirikizumab has a relevant role in the long-term treatment of UC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"41 12","pages":"4446 - 4462"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-024-03003-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-03003-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of biologics and small molecules for treatment of adults with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC).

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials evaluating approved and emerging targeted therapies for patients with UC. A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) approach was applied. Outcomes assessed included clinical response and remission, endoscopic mucosal healing, and safety.

Results

Thirty studies were included in the NMA following a feasibility assessment comparing approved induction dosing regimens and 22 studies comparing approved maintenance dosing regimens. In the biologic/Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi)-naïve population, induction studies showed similar clinical response and remission rates across most interventions, with upadacitinib demonstrating significant improvements versus most other interventions. For maintenance studies, mirikizumab demonstrated significant improvements in clinical response and remission versus most other interventions. In the biologic/JAKi-experienced population, no significant differences were observed between most interventions in induction studies, except for significantly improved clinical response and remission for mirikizumab versus adalimumab, and upadacitinib demonstrated significant improvement versus all other interventions. Few differences between active treatments were observed in maintenance studies. In both populations, all active interventions had similar efficacy in terms of endoscopic mucosal healing in both induction and maintenance studies. Regardless of prior treatment exposure, similar rates of serious adverse events were seen across all active interventions in the induction period.

Conclusion

Among the available interventions, owing to its favourable efficacy and safety profile, mirikizumab has a relevant role in the long-term treatment of UC.

中度至重度活动性溃疡性结肠炎先进疗法的疗效和安全性:系统综述和网络 Meta 分析。
简介本研究旨在比较生物制剂和小分子药物治疗中度至重度活动性溃疡性结肠炎(UC)成人患者的疗效和安全性:方法: 我们进行了系统性文献综述,以确定对已获批准的和新出现的治疗溃疡性结肠炎患者的靶向疗法进行评估的随机对照试验。采用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA)方法。评估的结果包括临床反应和缓解、内镜下粘膜愈合以及安全性:在对已获批准的诱导给药方案和已获批准的维持给药方案分别进行可行性评估后,30 项研究和 22 项研究被纳入 NMA。在生物制剂/破伤风激酶抑制剂(JAKi)未获批准的人群中,大多数干预措施的诱导研究显示出相似的临床反应和缓解率,其中达达替尼与大多数其他干预措施相比有显著改善。在维持治疗研究中,米利珠单抗与其他大多数干预措施相比,临床反应和缓解率均有显著改善。在有生物制剂/JAKi经验的人群中,除了米利珠单抗与阿达木单抗相比在临床反应和缓解方面有明显改善外,在诱导研究中大多数干预措施之间没有观察到显著差异,而达达替尼与所有其他干预措施相比有明显改善。在维持治疗研究中,几乎没有观察到活性疗法之间的差异。在这两种人群中,在诱导和维持研究中,所有积极干预措施在内镜粘膜愈合方面都具有相似的疗效。无论之前是否接受过治疗,在诱导期,所有积极干预措施的严重不良反应发生率相似:结论:在现有的干预措施中,米利珠单抗因其良好的疗效和安全性,在UC的长期治疗中具有重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信