Hematologists' state of knowledge on practical aspects of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) in adult patients: A Young Hematologists' Club survey.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Magdalena Witkowska, Przemysław Kasiak, Kamila Kruczkowska-Tarantowicz, Marcin Jońca, Agnieszka Walczyk, Michał Górka, Monika Sidor, Bartosz Puła, Rafał Machowicz
{"title":"Hematologists' state of knowledge on practical aspects of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) in adult patients: A Young Hematologists' Club survey.","authors":"Magdalena Witkowska, Przemysław Kasiak, Kamila Kruczkowska-Tarantowicz, Marcin Jońca, Agnieszka Walczyk, Michał Górka, Monika Sidor, Bartosz Puła, Rafał Machowicz","doi":"10.17219/acem/189945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening hyperinflammatory syndrome with various etiologies. Its treatment is complicated by several important but not immediately obvious issues (e.g., HLH-2004 criteria are the most commonly used for diagnosis, but the recommended therapeutic regimen is HLH-94).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to assess hematologists' practical knowledge of HLH.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A survey was conducted among physicians treating adult hematological patients. A 10-question paper questionnaire was distributed to physicians from various hematology centers. A total of 126 questionnaires were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents had little-to-moderate experience in caring for HLH patients: 59% treated 0-2 patients and 36% treated between 3-5 patients. Among the respondents, the preferred diagnostic criteria were HLH-2004, either in its original form (5 out of 8 criteria) for 70 respondents or its modified version (4 out of 6 available criteria when ferritin exceeds 2,000 ng/mL) for 56 respondents. The preferred treatment regimen was HLH-2004, with a full dose of etoposide in 72 responses or reduced in 39 responses. Fifty percent of respondents incorrectly answered that meeting the HLH-2004 criteria necessitates the use of the HLH-94/2004 regimen in full doses and duration. Sixty-four percent of respondents correctly identified that hemophagocytosis is not necessary for the diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey reveals that the majority of surveyed physicians adhere to international HLH recommendations. However, there are instances where these guidelines are not fully implemented, which underlines the need for further efforts to raise awareness and share clinical experiences about this patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/189945","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening hyperinflammatory syndrome with various etiologies. Its treatment is complicated by several important but not immediately obvious issues (e.g., HLH-2004 criteria are the most commonly used for diagnosis, but the recommended therapeutic regimen is HLH-94).

Objectives: The study aimed to assess hematologists' practical knowledge of HLH.

Material and methods: A survey was conducted among physicians treating adult hematological patients. A 10-question paper questionnaire was distributed to physicians from various hematology centers. A total of 126 questionnaires were analyzed.

Results: Most respondents had little-to-moderate experience in caring for HLH patients: 59% treated 0-2 patients and 36% treated between 3-5 patients. Among the respondents, the preferred diagnostic criteria were HLH-2004, either in its original form (5 out of 8 criteria) for 70 respondents or its modified version (4 out of 6 available criteria when ferritin exceeds 2,000 ng/mL) for 56 respondents. The preferred treatment regimen was HLH-2004, with a full dose of etoposide in 72 responses or reduced in 39 responses. Fifty percent of respondents incorrectly answered that meeting the HLH-2004 criteria necessitates the use of the HLH-94/2004 regimen in full doses and duration. Sixty-four percent of respondents correctly identified that hemophagocytosis is not necessary for the diagnosis.

Conclusions: This survey reveals that the majority of surveyed physicians adhere to international HLH recommendations. However, there are instances where these guidelines are not fully implemented, which underlines the need for further efforts to raise awareness and share clinical experiences about this patient group.

血液病学家对成年患者嗜血细胞淋巴组织细胞增多症(HLH)实际问题的了解程度:青年血液学家俱乐部调查。
背景:嗜血细胞淋巴组织细胞增多症(HLH)是一种危及生命的高炎症综合征,病因多种多样。它的治疗因几个重要但并非显而易见的问题而变得复杂(例如,HLH-2004 标准是最常用的诊断标准,但推荐的治疗方案却是 HLH-94):研究旨在评估血液科医生对 HLH 的实际认识:对治疗成人血液病患者的医生进行了调查。向来自不同血液学中心的医生发放了一份包含 10 个问题的纸质问卷。共对 126 份问卷进行了分析:结果:大多数受访者在治疗 HLH 患者方面只有很少到中等程度的经验:59%的受访者治疗过 0-2 名患者,36%的受访者治疗过 3-5 名患者。在受访者中,首选的诊断标准是 HLH-2004,有 70 位受访者选择了其原始版本(8 项标准中的 5 项),有 56 位受访者选择了其修改版本(当铁蛋白超过 2,000 纳克/毫升时,6 项可用标准中的 4 项)。首选的治疗方案是 HLH-2004,72 个受访者选择了全剂量依托泊苷,39 个受访者选择了减量依托泊苷。50%的受访者错误地回答,符合 HLH-2004 标准就必须使用全剂量、持续时间长的 HLH-94/2004 方案。64%的受访者正确地指出嗜血细胞增多症不是诊断的必要条件:本次调查显示,大多数受访医生遵守国际 HLH 建议。结论:本次调查显示,大多数受访医生都遵守了国际 HLH 建议,但也存在未完全执行这些指南的情况,这说明需要进一步努力提高对该患者群体的认识并分享临床经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly. Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff. Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj. Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker. The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition. In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus. Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信