Quality of Life and Anxiety Status of Patients with Ovarian Tumor Undergoing Enhanced Recovery after Surgery.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Xiaonan Ru, Xiaoli Yuan, Yawei Zhang, Yuan Zhang, Lisha Shu, Ying He, Liping Zhang
{"title":"Quality of Life and Anxiety Status of Patients with Ovarian Tumor Undergoing Enhanced Recovery after Surgery.","authors":"Xiaonan Ru, Xiaoli Yuan, Yawei Zhang, Yuan Zhang, Lisha Shu, Ying He, Liping Zhang","doi":"10.62641/aep.v52i5.1847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to explore the quality of life and anxiety status of patients with ovarian tumor undergoing enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 300 patients with ovarian tumor admitted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University. The patients were divided into two groups according to the perioperative management methods. A total of 156 patients who received traditional perioperative management were included in the control group, and the ERAS group included 144 patients who received traditional perioperative management combined with ERAS management. Quality of life questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30) and self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) were used to compare the postoperative quality of life and anxiety status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ERAS group showed significantly shorter first feeding time (p < 0.001), exhaust time (p < 0.001) and defecation time (p = 0.002), infusion time (p = 0.026), and hospitalization time (p < 0.001) than the control group. Inter-group comparison showed no significant difference in QLQ-C30 scores in terms of physical (p = 0.345), role (p = 0.509), emotional (p = 0.235), cognitive (p = 0.462), and social functions (p = 0.645) before surgery. The scores of physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functions in the ERAS group were significantly higher than the control group after surgery (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in preoperative anxiety scores between the two groups (p = 0.056). The postoperative anxiety score of the ERAS group was significantly lower than that of the control group (p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ERAS could alleviate the postoperative negative emotions such as anxiety, promote the physical and mental health and improve the quality of life of patients with ovarian tumor.</p>","PeriodicalId":7251,"journal":{"name":"Actas espanolas de psiquiatria","volume":"52 5","pages":"686-692"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas espanolas de psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62641/aep.v52i5.1847","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to explore the quality of life and anxiety status of patients with ovarian tumor undergoing enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).

Methods: This article retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 300 patients with ovarian tumor admitted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University. The patients were divided into two groups according to the perioperative management methods. A total of 156 patients who received traditional perioperative management were included in the control group, and the ERAS group included 144 patients who received traditional perioperative management combined with ERAS management. Quality of life questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30) and self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) were used to compare the postoperative quality of life and anxiety status.

Results: The ERAS group showed significantly shorter first feeding time (p < 0.001), exhaust time (p < 0.001) and defecation time (p = 0.002), infusion time (p = 0.026), and hospitalization time (p < 0.001) than the control group. Inter-group comparison showed no significant difference in QLQ-C30 scores in terms of physical (p = 0.345), role (p = 0.509), emotional (p = 0.235), cognitive (p = 0.462), and social functions (p = 0.645) before surgery. The scores of physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functions in the ERAS group were significantly higher than the control group after surgery (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in preoperative anxiety scores between the two groups (p = 0.056). The postoperative anxiety score of the ERAS group was significantly lower than that of the control group (p = 0.002).

Conclusions: ERAS could alleviate the postoperative negative emotions such as anxiety, promote the physical and mental health and improve the quality of life of patients with ovarian tumor.

卵巢肿瘤术后接受强化康复治疗的患者的生活质量和焦虑状况
研究背景本研究旨在探讨卵巢肿瘤患者接受术后康复强化治疗(ERAS)后的生活质量和焦虑状况:本文回顾性分析了河北北方学院第一附属医院收治的 300 例卵巢肿瘤患者的临床资料。根据围手术期处理方法将患者分为两组。对照组包括156例接受传统围手术期管理的患者,ERAS组包括144例接受传统围手术期管理与ERAS管理相结合的患者。采用生活质量问卷-C30(QLQ-C30)和焦虑自评量表(SAS)比较术后生活质量和焦虑状况:结果:ERAS组的首次进食时间(p < 0.001)、排气时间(p < 0.001)、排便时间(p = 0.002)、输液时间(p = 0.026)和住院时间(p < 0.001)均明显短于对照组。组间比较显示,术前 QLQ-C30 评分在身体(p = 0.345)、角色(p = 0.509)、情绪(p = 0.235)、认知(p = 0.462)和社会功能(p = 0.645)方面无明显差异。手术后,ERAS 组的身体功能、角色功能、情感功能、认知功能和社会功能得分明显高于对照组(p < 0.001)。两组术前焦虑评分无明显差异(P = 0.056)。ERAS组的术后焦虑评分明显低于对照组(p = 0.002):ERAS可缓解卵巢肿瘤患者术后焦虑等负面情绪,促进患者身心健康,提高生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Actas espanolas de psiquiatria
Actas espanolas de psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría publicará de manera preferente trabajos relacionados con investigación clínica en el área de la Psiquiatría, la Psicología Clínica y la Salud Mental.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信