Feasibility of preventing massive contrast media extravasation using a sensor device in contrast-enhanced CT: an observational study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1177/02841851241287314
Yoriaki Matsumoto, Ayaka Chikasue, Miho Kondo, Tomoyuki Akita, Masao Kiguchi, Yuko Nakamura, Kazuo Awai
{"title":"Feasibility of preventing massive contrast media extravasation using a sensor device in contrast-enhanced CT: an observational study.","authors":"Yoriaki Matsumoto, Ayaka Chikasue, Miho Kondo, Tomoyuki Akita, Masao Kiguchi, Yuko Nakamura, Kazuo Awai","doi":"10.1177/02841851241287314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent guidelines recommend direct patient observation, pressure monitoring, and sensor devices to prevent extravasation during contrast media (CM) injection. However, it is impractical in terms of time and cost to install sensors for all patients.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify risk factors for CM extravasations during contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in a large population and to establish criteria for placing the sensor device on patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 143,556 patients who underwent CECT at our hospital between April 2012 and July 2022. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis between patients with (n = 350) and randomly selected patients without CM extravasation (n = 350). We investigated the percentage of patients with sensor devices and their sensitivity for detecting extravasation using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The extravasation rate was 0.27%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the injection rate (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.33-1.95: <i>P</i> <0.001), catheter gauge (AOR = 3.86, 95% CI = 1.92-7.76; <i>P</i> <0.001), the use of anticancer drugs (AOR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.32-2.50; <i>P</i> <0.001), and existing catheters (AOR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.10-2.11; <i>P</i> = 0.009) were significantly associated with extravasation. To achieve a sensitivity of 90%, 80%, 70%, 60%, and 50%, 80%, 65%, 50%, 40%, and 28% of all patients required the placement of a sensor device, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sensitivity analysis established criteria for effective placing sensor devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1325-1331"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241287314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent guidelines recommend direct patient observation, pressure monitoring, and sensor devices to prevent extravasation during contrast media (CM) injection. However, it is impractical in terms of time and cost to install sensors for all patients.

Purpose: To identify risk factors for CM extravasations during contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in a large population and to establish criteria for placing the sensor device on patients.

Material and methods: This retrospective study included 143,556 patients who underwent CECT at our hospital between April 2012 and July 2022. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis between patients with (n = 350) and randomly selected patients without CM extravasation (n = 350). We investigated the percentage of patients with sensor devices and their sensitivity for detecting extravasation using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results: The extravasation rate was 0.27%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the injection rate (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.33-1.95: P <0.001), catheter gauge (AOR = 3.86, 95% CI = 1.92-7.76; P <0.001), the use of anticancer drugs (AOR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.32-2.50; P <0.001), and existing catheters (AOR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.10-2.11; P = 0.009) were significantly associated with extravasation. To achieve a sensitivity of 90%, 80%, 70%, 60%, and 50%, 80%, 65%, 50%, 40%, and 28% of all patients required the placement of a sensor device, respectively.

Conclusion: Sensitivity analysis established criteria for effective placing sensor devices.

在造影剂增强 CT 中使用感应装置防止大量造影剂外渗的可行性:一项观察性研究。
背景:最近的指南建议通过直接观察患者、压力监测和传感器设备来防止造影剂(CM)注射过程中的外渗。目的:确定造影剂增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)过程中造影剂外渗的风险因素,并制定在患者身上安装传感器装置的标准:这项回顾性研究纳入了2012年4月至2022年7月期间在我院接受CECT检查的143556名患者。我们对有 CM 外渗的患者(n = 350)和随机选择的无 CM 外渗的患者(n = 350)进行了多变量逻辑回归分析。我们使用接收器操作特征曲线分析法调查了装有传感器设备的患者比例及其检测外渗的灵敏度:结果:外渗率为 0.27%。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,注射率(调整赔率 [AOR] = 1.61,95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.33-1.95:P P P = 0.009)与外渗显著相关。要达到 90%、80%、70%、60% 和 50% 的灵敏度,分别有 80%、65%、50%、40% 和 28% 的患者需要放置传感器设备:灵敏度分析确立了有效放置传感器装置的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信