Evaluation of the reliability and accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of meniscal ramp lesions.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1177/02841851241286765
Sara Escoda Menéndez, Pedro García González, Ana Rosa Meana Morís, Miguel Del Valle Soto, Antonio Maestro Fernández
{"title":"Evaluation of the reliability and accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of meniscal ramp lesions.","authors":"Sara Escoda Menéndez, Pedro García González, Ana Rosa Meana Morís, Miguel Del Valle Soto, Antonio Maestro Fernández","doi":"10.1177/02841851241286765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meniscal ramp lesions are a special type of meniscal injury that affects the periphery of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus and/or its meniscocapsular attachments, strongly associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Due to their location, these lesions can be missed arthroscopically so it is essential to diagnose them on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of MRI in detecting meniscal ramp lesions in patients with ACL tears using arthroscopy as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Two musculoskeletal radiologists, blinded to the surgical findings, retrospectively and independently evaluated 106 knee MRI scans for the presence of meniscal ramp lesions in non-consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction between January 2019 and July 2022 by a single surgeon at one institution. Having arthroscopy as reference, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity as well as the positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) of the MRI scans were calculated. Cohen's kappa coefficient was used to test inter-observer reliability. A <i>P</i> value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study group of 106 patients (72 men, 34 women; mean age = 33.84 ±13.12 years), 76 had an arthroscopy-confirmed meniscal ramp lesion, while 30 did not. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for the detection of meniscal ramp lesion were 88% and 87%, respectively. The PPV and NPV were 94% and 74%, respectively. Inter-rater reliability was excellent (k = 0915).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that MRI can accurately detect meniscal ramp lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1382-1389"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241286765","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Meniscal ramp lesions are a special type of meniscal injury that affects the periphery of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus and/or its meniscocapsular attachments, strongly associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Due to their location, these lesions can be missed arthroscopically so it is essential to diagnose them on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of MRI in detecting meniscal ramp lesions in patients with ACL tears using arthroscopy as the reference standard.

Material and methods: Two musculoskeletal radiologists, blinded to the surgical findings, retrospectively and independently evaluated 106 knee MRI scans for the presence of meniscal ramp lesions in non-consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction between January 2019 and July 2022 by a single surgeon at one institution. Having arthroscopy as reference, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity as well as the positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) of the MRI scans were calculated. Cohen's kappa coefficient was used to test inter-observer reliability. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: In the study group of 106 patients (72 men, 34 women; mean age = 33.84 ±13.12 years), 76 had an arthroscopy-confirmed meniscal ramp lesion, while 30 did not. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for the detection of meniscal ramp lesion were 88% and 87%, respectively. The PPV and NPV were 94% and 74%, respectively. Inter-rater reliability was excellent (k = 0915).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that MRI can accurately detect meniscal ramp lesions.

评估磁共振成像诊断半月板斜坡病变的可靠性和准确性。
背景:半月板斜坡损伤是一种特殊类型的半月板损伤,影响内侧半月板后角的外周和/或其半月板囊附件,与前十字韧带(ACL)撕裂密切相关。目的:以关节镜检查为参考标准,评估磁共振成像检测前交叉韧带撕裂患者半月板斜面病变的准确性:两名肌肉骨骼放射科医生在手术结果盲区内,回顾性地独立评估了106例膝关节MRI扫描,以确定是否存在半月板斜坡病变,这些非连续性患者均在2019年1月至2022年7月期间接受了关节镜前交叉韧带重建术。以关节镜为参考,计算了核磁共振扫描的诊断敏感性、特异性以及阳性预测值和阴性预测值(PPV/NPV)。科恩卡帕系数(Cohen's kappa coefficient)用于检验观察者之间的可靠性。A P 值 结果:在研究组的 106 名患者(72 名男性,34 名女性;平均年龄 = 33.84 ± 13.12 岁)中,76 人经关节镜检查确诊为半月板坡道病变,30 人未确诊。磁共振成像检测半月板斜坡病变的敏感性和特异性分别为88%和87%。PPV和NPV分别为94%和74%。评分者之间的可靠性极佳(k = 0915):本研究表明,磁共振成像可准确检测半月板斜坡病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信