Integration WGCNA with LC-MS data for evaluating the processing status and transformation rules of Ligustri Lucidi Fructus: A novel strategy for evaluating the processing technology of traditional Chinese medicines.
Xuemei Zhang, Jinyan Li, Lin Zhang, Xiaolin Wu, Yijun Wang, Lele Zhang, Ying Zhou, Lifeng Han, Liming Wang, Erwei Liu
{"title":"Integration WGCNA with LC-MS data for evaluating the processing status and transformation rules of Ligustri Lucidi Fructus: A novel strategy for evaluating the processing technology of traditional Chinese medicines.","authors":"Xuemei Zhang, Jinyan Li, Lin Zhang, Xiaolin Wu, Yijun Wang, Lele Zhang, Ying Zhou, Lifeng Han, Liming Wang, Erwei Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.talanta.2024.127029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ligustri Lucidi Fructus (LLF) is a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) to treat hepatopathy and osteopathy. Wine-processed LLF (WLLF) was much more widely used than raw LLF (RLLF) in clinical practice, however, there is no consensus on processing time. To investigate the processing status of WLLF and transformation rules during processing, a UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap-MS method combined with data-independent acquisition (DIA) mode was firstly established and 227 compounds were identified or tentatively identified. Subsequently, a novel strategy using integration weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) with LC-MS data was proposed. A total of 73 differential metabolites were screened out between RLLF and WLLF (wine steaming for 18 h). Meanwhile, the concentration of 11 differential compounds for WLLF was quantified. Finally, correlations between compounds were analyzed by WGCNA and the top five compounds negatively correlated with salidroside were validated, revealing that G13, specnuezhenide, oleuropein, acteoside, and neonuzhenide could be transformed into salidroside and its analogues during processing, respectively. The results indicated that our proposed strategy could be effectively employed to evaluate the processing status of TCMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":435,"journal":{"name":"Talanta","volume":"282 ","pages":"127029"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Talanta","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2024.127029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ligustri Lucidi Fructus (LLF) is a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) to treat hepatopathy and osteopathy. Wine-processed LLF (WLLF) was much more widely used than raw LLF (RLLF) in clinical practice, however, there is no consensus on processing time. To investigate the processing status of WLLF and transformation rules during processing, a UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap-MS method combined with data-independent acquisition (DIA) mode was firstly established and 227 compounds were identified or tentatively identified. Subsequently, a novel strategy using integration weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) with LC-MS data was proposed. A total of 73 differential metabolites were screened out between RLLF and WLLF (wine steaming for 18 h). Meanwhile, the concentration of 11 differential compounds for WLLF was quantified. Finally, correlations between compounds were analyzed by WGCNA and the top five compounds negatively correlated with salidroside were validated, revealing that G13, specnuezhenide, oleuropein, acteoside, and neonuzhenide could be transformed into salidroside and its analogues during processing, respectively. The results indicated that our proposed strategy could be effectively employed to evaluate the processing status of TCMs.
期刊介绍:
Talanta provides a forum for the publication of original research papers, short communications, and critical reviews in all branches of pure and applied analytical chemistry. Papers are evaluated based on established guidelines, including the fundamental nature of the study, scientific novelty, substantial improvement or advantage over existing technology or methods, and demonstrated analytical applicability. Original research papers on fundamental studies, and on novel sensor and instrumentation developments, are encouraged. Novel or improved applications in areas such as clinical and biological chemistry, environmental analysis, geochemistry, materials science and engineering, and analytical platforms for omics development are welcome.
Analytical performance of methods should be determined, including interference and matrix effects, and methods should be validated by comparison with a standard method, or analysis of a certified reference material. Simple spiking recoveries may not be sufficient. The developed method should especially comprise information on selectivity, sensitivity, detection limits, accuracy, and reliability. However, applying official validation or robustness studies to a routine method or technique does not necessarily constitute novelty. Proper statistical treatment of the data should be provided. Relevant literature should be cited, including related publications by the authors, and authors should discuss how their proposed methodology compares with previously reported methods.