Decrease in purifying selection pressures on wheat homoeologous genes: tetraploidization versus hexaploidization

IF 6.2 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Akihiro Ezoe, Daisuke Todaka, Yoshinori Utsumi, Satoshi Takahashi, Kanako Kawaura, Motoaki Seki
{"title":"Decrease in purifying selection pressures on wheat homoeologous genes: tetraploidization versus hexaploidization","authors":"Akihiro Ezoe,&nbsp;Daisuke Todaka,&nbsp;Yoshinori Utsumi,&nbsp;Satoshi Takahashi,&nbsp;Kanako Kawaura,&nbsp;Motoaki Seki","doi":"10.1111/tpj.17047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A series of polyploidizations in higher-order polyploids is the main event affecting gene content in a genome. Each polyploidization event can lead to massive functional divergence because of the subsequent decrease in selection pressure on duplicated genes; however, the causal relationship between multiple rounds of polyploidization and the functional divergence of duplicated genes is poorly understood. We focused on the <i>Triticum</i>–<i>Aegilops</i> complex lineage and compared selection pressure before and after tetraploidization and hexaploidization events. Although both events led to decreased selection pressure on homoeologous gene pairs (compared with diploids and tetraploids), the initial tetraploidization had a greater impact on selection pressure on homoeologous gene pairs than did subsequent hexaploidization. Consistent with this, selection pressure on expression patterns for the initial event relaxed more than those for the subsequent event. Surprisingly, the decreased selection pressure on these homoeologous genes was independent of the existence of in-paralogs within the same subgenome. Wheat homoeologous pairs had different evolutionary consequences compared with orthologs related to other mechanisms (ancient allopolyploidization, ancient autopolyploidization, and small-scale duplication). Furthermore, tetraploidization and hexaploidization also seemed to have different evolutionary consequences. This suggests that homoeologous genes retain unique functions, including functions that are unlikely to be preserved in genes generated by the other duplication mechanisms. We found that their unique functions differed between tetraploidization and hexaploidization (e.g., reproductive and chromosome segregation processes). These findings imply that the substantial number of gene pairs resulting from multiple allopolyploidization events, especially initial tetraploidization, may have been a unique source of functional divergence.</p>","PeriodicalId":233,"journal":{"name":"The Plant Journal","volume":"120 3","pages":"1190-1205"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tpj.17047","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Plant Journal","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tpj.17047","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A series of polyploidizations in higher-order polyploids is the main event affecting gene content in a genome. Each polyploidization event can lead to massive functional divergence because of the subsequent decrease in selection pressure on duplicated genes; however, the causal relationship between multiple rounds of polyploidization and the functional divergence of duplicated genes is poorly understood. We focused on the TriticumAegilops complex lineage and compared selection pressure before and after tetraploidization and hexaploidization events. Although both events led to decreased selection pressure on homoeologous gene pairs (compared with diploids and tetraploids), the initial tetraploidization had a greater impact on selection pressure on homoeologous gene pairs than did subsequent hexaploidization. Consistent with this, selection pressure on expression patterns for the initial event relaxed more than those for the subsequent event. Surprisingly, the decreased selection pressure on these homoeologous genes was independent of the existence of in-paralogs within the same subgenome. Wheat homoeologous pairs had different evolutionary consequences compared with orthologs related to other mechanisms (ancient allopolyploidization, ancient autopolyploidization, and small-scale duplication). Furthermore, tetraploidization and hexaploidization also seemed to have different evolutionary consequences. This suggests that homoeologous genes retain unique functions, including functions that are unlikely to be preserved in genes generated by the other duplication mechanisms. We found that their unique functions differed between tetraploidization and hexaploidization (e.g., reproductive and chromosome segregation processes). These findings imply that the substantial number of gene pairs resulting from multiple allopolyploidization events, especially initial tetraploidization, may have been a unique source of functional divergence.

Abstract Image

小麦同源基因纯化选择压力的降低:四倍体化与六倍化。
高阶多倍体的一系列多倍体化是影响基因组中基因含量的主要事件。由于重复基因的选择压力随之降低,每次多倍体化都可能导致大规模的功能分化;然而,人们对多轮多倍体化与重复基因功能分化之间的因果关系知之甚少。我们重点研究了Triticum-Aegilops复合品系,并比较了四倍体化和六倍化前后的选择压力。虽然这两个事件都导致同源基因对的选择压力下降(与二倍体和四倍体相比),但最初的四倍体化对同源基因对选择压力的影响要大于随后的六倍化。与此相一致的是,初始事件对表达模式的选择压力比后续事件的选择压力更宽松。令人惊讶的是,这些同源基因选择压力的降低与同一亚基因组中是否存在内同源基因无关。小麦同源基因对与其他机制(古代异源多倍体化、古代自源多倍体化和小规模复制)相关的直向同源基因相比,具有不同的进化后果。此外,四倍体化和六倍化似乎也有不同的进化后果。这表明同源基因保留了独特的功能,包括其他复制机制产生的基因不太可能保留的功能。我们发现,它们的独特功能在四倍体化和六倍化过程中有所不同(如生殖和染色体分离过程)。这些发现意味着,由多次异源多倍体化(尤其是最初的四倍体化)产生的大量基因对可能是功能分化的独特来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Plant Journal
The Plant Journal 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
415
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Publishing the best original research papers in all key areas of modern plant biology from the world"s leading laboratories, The Plant Journal provides a dynamic forum for this ever growing international research community. Plant science research is now at the forefront of research in the biological sciences, with breakthroughs in our understanding of fundamental processes in plants matching those in other organisms. The impact of molecular genetics and the availability of model and crop species can be seen in all aspects of plant biology. For publication in The Plant Journal the research must provide a highly significant new contribution to our understanding of plants and be of general interest to the plant science community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信