Pharmacological interventions for co-occurring psychopathology in people with borderline personality disorder: secondary analysis of the Cochrane systematic review with meta-analyses

Johanne Pereira Ribeiro, Sophie Juul, Mickey T. Kongerslev, Mie Sedoc Jørgensen, Birgit A Völlm, Henriette Edemann-Callesen, Christian Sales, Julie P. Schaug, Klaus Lieb, Erik Simonsen, Jutta M. Stoffers-Winterling, Ole Jakob Storebø
{"title":"Pharmacological interventions for co-occurring psychopathology in people with borderline personality disorder: secondary analysis of the Cochrane systematic review with meta-analyses","authors":"Johanne Pereira Ribeiro, Sophie Juul, Mickey T. Kongerslev, Mie Sedoc Jørgensen, Birgit A Völlm, Henriette Edemann-Callesen, Christian Sales, Julie P. Schaug, Klaus Lieb, Erik Simonsen, Jutta M. Stoffers-Winterling, Ole Jakob Storebø","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2024.172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background</span><p>Medications are commonly used to treat co-occurring psychopathology in persons with borderline personality disorder (BPD)</p><span>Aims</span><p>To systematically review and integrate the evidence of medications for treatment of co-occurring psychopathology in people with BPD, and explore the role of comorbidities.</p><span>Method</span><p>Building on the current Cochrane review of medications in BPD, an update literature search was done in March 2024. We followed the methods of this Cochrane review, but scrutinised all identified placebo-controlled trials <span>post hoc</span> for reporting of non BPD-specific (‘co-occurring’) psychopathology, and explored treatment effects in subgroups of samples with and without defined co-occurring disorders. GRADE ratings were done to assess the evidence certainty.</p><span>Results</span><p>Twenty-two trials were available for quantitative analyses. For antipsychotics, we found very-low-certainty evidence (VLCE) of an effect on depressive symptoms (standardised mean difference (SMD) −0.22, <span>P</span> = 0.04), and low-certainty evidence (LCE) of an effect on psychotic–dissociative symptoms (SMD −0.28, <span>P</span> = 0.007). There was evidence of effects of anticonvulsants on depressive (SMD −0.44, <span>P</span> = 0.02; LCE) and anxious symptoms (SMD −1.11, <span>P</span> &lt; 0.00001; VLCE). For antidepressants, no significant findings were observed (VLCE). Exploratory subgroup analyses indicated a greater effect of antipsychotics in samples including participants with co-occurring substance use disorders on psychotic–dissociative symptoms (<span>P</span> = 0.001).</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>Our findings, based on VLCE and LCE only, do not support the use of pharmacological interventions in people with BPD to target co-occurring psychopathology. Overall, the current evidence does not support differential treatment effects in persons with versus without defined comorbidities. Medications should be used cautiously to target co-occurring psychopathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Medications are commonly used to treat co-occurring psychopathology in persons with borderline personality disorder (BPD)

Aims

To systematically review and integrate the evidence of medications for treatment of co-occurring psychopathology in people with BPD, and explore the role of comorbidities.

Method

Building on the current Cochrane review of medications in BPD, an update literature search was done in March 2024. We followed the methods of this Cochrane review, but scrutinised all identified placebo-controlled trials post hoc for reporting of non BPD-specific (‘co-occurring’) psychopathology, and explored treatment effects in subgroups of samples with and without defined co-occurring disorders. GRADE ratings were done to assess the evidence certainty.

Results

Twenty-two trials were available for quantitative analyses. For antipsychotics, we found very-low-certainty evidence (VLCE) of an effect on depressive symptoms (standardised mean difference (SMD) −0.22, P = 0.04), and low-certainty evidence (LCE) of an effect on psychotic–dissociative symptoms (SMD −0.28, P = 0.007). There was evidence of effects of anticonvulsants on depressive (SMD −0.44, P = 0.02; LCE) and anxious symptoms (SMD −1.11, P < 0.00001; VLCE). For antidepressants, no significant findings were observed (VLCE). Exploratory subgroup analyses indicated a greater effect of antipsychotics in samples including participants with co-occurring substance use disorders on psychotic–dissociative symptoms (P = 0.001).

Conclusions

Our findings, based on VLCE and LCE only, do not support the use of pharmacological interventions in people with BPD to target co-occurring psychopathology. Overall, the current evidence does not support differential treatment effects in persons with versus without defined comorbidities. Medications should be used cautiously to target co-occurring psychopathology.

针对边缘型人格障碍患者并发精神病理学的药物干预:对科克伦系统综述的二次分析和荟萃分析
背景药物通常用于治疗边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者的并发精神病理学。方法在目前关于BPD药物的Cochrane综述的基础上,我们于2024年3月进行了更新文献检索。我们沿用了该 Cochrane 综述的方法,但对所有已确定的安慰剂对照试验进行了事后审查,以确定是否报告了非 BPD 特异性("共患")精神病理学,并在有和无明确共患疾病的亚组样本中探讨了治疗效果。我们对证据的确定性进行了 GRADE 评级。对于抗精神病药物,我们发现了对抑郁症状有影响的极低确定性证据(VLCE)(标准化平均差(SMD)-0.22,P = 0.04),以及对精神病性解离症状有影响的低确定性证据(LCE)(SMD -0.28,P = 0.007)。有证据表明抗惊厥药对抑郁症状(SMD -0.44,P = 0.02;LCE)和焦虑症状(SMD -1.11,P < 0.00001;VLCE)有影响。对于抗抑郁药,没有观察到显著的结果(VLCE)。探索性亚组分析表明,在包括共患药物使用障碍的参与者的样本中,抗精神病药物对精神病性解离症状的影响更大(P = 0.001)。结论我们的研究结果仅基于VLCE和LCE,不支持对BPD患者使用药物干预来治疗共患精神病理学。总体而言,目前的证据不支持对有明确合并症和无明确合并症的患者采取不同的治疗效果。针对共存的精神病理学,应谨慎使用药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信