Comment on ‘Change in Physical Activity and Its Association With Decline in Kidney Function: A UK Biobank-Based Cohort Study’ by Liu et al.

IF 8.9 1区 医学
Zhenzhi Qin, Yan Xu
{"title":"Comment on ‘Change in Physical Activity and Its Association With Decline in Kidney Function: A UK Biobank-Based Cohort Study’ by Liu et al.","authors":"Zhenzhi Qin, Yan Xu","doi":"10.1002/jcsm.13623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We read with great interest the recent article by Welsh et al. titled ‘Change in physical activity and its association with decline in kidney function: A UK Biobank-based cohort study’ in <i>Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle</i> [<span>1</span>]. The study finds that increased physical activity may protect kidney function, as suggested by the modest yet significant associations observed in large-scale analyses using eGFRCysC measurements. However, we note several biases in the use of the Cox proportional hazards (CoxPH) model that the authors did not address.</p>\n<p>The established criteria may result in mixed censoring outcomes, that is, right-censoring and interval-censoring events [<span>2, 3</span>]. Events of kidney function diagnosed through medical records could result in interval-censoring if they occurred between follow-up visits, and right-censoring for diagnosed between the end of follow-up and the time of data analysis. The CoxPH model primarily handles right-censored data. In contrast, the accelerated failure time (AFT) model is often preferred for scenarios involving various types of censored data [<span>4</span>]. The AFT model can effectively handle left-censored, right-censored and interval-censored data by appropriately adjusting the likelihood function [<span>5</span>]. By using the ‘survival’ and ‘icenReg’ packages, mixed censored data can be fitted and analysed, and event times can be estimated [<span>6</span>].</p>\n<p>Moreover, the CoxPH model requires the proportional hazards assumption, meaning that covariate effects are constant over time [<span>7</span>]. If this assumption is violated, the model may not provide unbiased estimates of the coefficients, and the predictions may not be reliable. The authors should utilize Schoenfeld residuals or alternative methods to evaluate the proportional hazards assumption for the association between covariates and the risk of kidney function. Schoenfeld residuals are calculated as the differences between the observed and expected values of covariates at each failure time [<span>8</span>]. If the residuals exhibit a systematic change over time, it suggests that the effect of the covariate may be time-dependent. When the proportional hazards assumption does not hold, authors should use a stratified Cox model, a Cox model with time-varying effects, or an AFT model instead of the standard CoxPH model [<span>4, 9</span>].</p>\n<p>In conclusion, we believe that a re-evaluation considering the potential impact of censoring events and the proportional hazards assumption is necessary. Further research is anticipated to provide more empirical data and clearer insights into this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.13623","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We read with great interest the recent article by Welsh et al. titled ‘Change in physical activity and its association with decline in kidney function: A UK Biobank-based cohort study’ in Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle [1]. The study finds that increased physical activity may protect kidney function, as suggested by the modest yet significant associations observed in large-scale analyses using eGFRCysC measurements. However, we note several biases in the use of the Cox proportional hazards (CoxPH) model that the authors did not address.

The established criteria may result in mixed censoring outcomes, that is, right-censoring and interval-censoring events [2, 3]. Events of kidney function diagnosed through medical records could result in interval-censoring if they occurred between follow-up visits, and right-censoring for diagnosed between the end of follow-up and the time of data analysis. The CoxPH model primarily handles right-censored data. In contrast, the accelerated failure time (AFT) model is often preferred for scenarios involving various types of censored data [4]. The AFT model can effectively handle left-censored, right-censored and interval-censored data by appropriately adjusting the likelihood function [5]. By using the ‘survival’ and ‘icenReg’ packages, mixed censored data can be fitted and analysed, and event times can be estimated [6].

Moreover, the CoxPH model requires the proportional hazards assumption, meaning that covariate effects are constant over time [7]. If this assumption is violated, the model may not provide unbiased estimates of the coefficients, and the predictions may not be reliable. The authors should utilize Schoenfeld residuals or alternative methods to evaluate the proportional hazards assumption for the association between covariates and the risk of kidney function. Schoenfeld residuals are calculated as the differences between the observed and expected values of covariates at each failure time [8]. If the residuals exhibit a systematic change over time, it suggests that the effect of the covariate may be time-dependent. When the proportional hazards assumption does not hold, authors should use a stratified Cox model, a Cox model with time-varying effects, or an AFT model instead of the standard CoxPH model [4, 9].

In conclusion, we believe that a re-evaluation considering the potential impact of censoring events and the proportional hazards assumption is necessary. Further research is anticipated to provide more empirical data and clearer insights into this field.

对 Liu 等人撰写的 "体育锻炼的变化及其与肾功能衰退的关系:基于英国生物库的队列研究 "的评论。
我们饶有兴趣地阅读了 Welsh 等人最近发表的一篇题为 "体力活动的变化及其与肾功能衰退的关系:基于英国生物库的队列研究 "的文章[1]。该研究发现,在使用 eGFRCysC 测量数据进行的大规模分析中观察到的适度但显著的关联表明,增加体育锻炼可能会保护肾功能。然而,我们注意到作者在使用 Cox 比例危险(CoxPH)模型时没有解决的几个偏差。既定标准可能会导致混合删减结果,即右侧删减和区间删减事件[2, 3]。通过病历诊断出的肾功能事件,如果发生在随访期间,则可能导致区间删减,而如果诊断发生在随访结束到数据分析期间,则可能导致右侧删减。CoxPH 模型主要处理右删失数据。相比之下,加速失效时间(AFT)模型通常是涉及各种类型删减数据情况下的首选[4]。通过适当调整似然函数,AFT 模型可以有效处理左删失、右删失和区间删失数据 [5]。通过使用 "survival "和 "icenReg "软件包,可以拟合和分析混合删失数据,并估计事件发生时间[6]。如果违反了这一假设,模型可能无法提供系数的无偏估计值,预测结果也可能不可靠。作者应利用 Schoenfeld 残差或其他方法来评估协变量与肾功能风险之间的比例危险假设。Schoenfeld 残差的计算方法是,在每个衰竭时间,协变量的观察值和预期值之间的差异[8]。如果残差随时间呈现系统性变化,则表明协变量的影响可能与时间有关。当比例危险假设不成立时,作者应使用分层 Cox 模型、具有时变效应的 Cox 模型或 AFT 模型来代替标准 CoxPH 模型[4, 9]。预计进一步的研究将为这一领域提供更多的经验数据和更清晰的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
自引率
12.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia, and Muscle is a prestigious, peer-reviewed international publication committed to disseminating research and clinical insights pertaining to cachexia, sarcopenia, body composition, and the physiological and pathophysiological alterations occurring throughout the lifespan and in various illnesses across the spectrum of life sciences. This journal serves as a valuable resource for physicians, biochemists, biologists, dieticians, pharmacologists, and students alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信