Response of Runoff, Sediment Yield, and Runoff‐Related Dissolved Organic Carbon Loss to Variable Straw Mulching Rates on Sloping Lands of Regosols

IF 3.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ke Liang, Tianyang Li, Yaoyue Zhang, Haixiang Zhang, Binghui He
{"title":"Response of Runoff, Sediment Yield, and Runoff‐Related Dissolved Organic Carbon Loss to Variable Straw Mulching Rates on Sloping Lands of Regosols","authors":"Ke Liang, Tianyang Li, Yaoyue Zhang, Haixiang Zhang, Binghui He","doi":"10.1002/ldr.5343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dissolved organic carbon (DOC), an organic carbon fraction with high activeness and mobility, migrated by runoff is a key part in carbon cycle. A rational straw mulching rate can be regulated to obtain maximum benefits while controlling runoff and sediment yield on sloping lands. However, little remains known about the optimal straw mulching rates required for effectively reducing the loss of DOC in runoff. Therefore, to overcome the existing limitations, this study investigated the effects of modified maize straw mulching rates on the loss of DOC during runoff, utilizing indoor rainfall simulation. Five mulching rates, including 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 kg m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> [control (CK) and treatments (T1, T2, T3, and T4), respectively], were tested in combination with three slope gradients (10°, 15°, and 20°) to evaluate how straw mulching rate influences runoff, sediment yield, and runoff‐related DOC loss under a heavy rainfall intensity of 90 mm h<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. Our results showed that various straw mulching rates did not significantly differ runoff rates; however, straw mulching significantly reduced sediment concentration and yield. Moreover, the reduction in sediment yield increased with an increase in mulching rate. Compared to the CK, T1 resulted in a 63% increase in DOC loss at a slope of 20°. Additionally, T2 caused an 8% and 7.2% increase in DOC loss at both 10° and 15° slopes. Conversely, T3 and T4 reduced DOC loss by 54.1%–80.8% and 51.1%–65.2%, respectively, across all slope gradients. These results suggested that mulching rates of 0.2–0.4 kg m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> may potentially increase DOC loss in runoff on the sloping lands. Our results hold significant importance in optimizing the use of straw mulching for sustainable management practices in agricultural lands.","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5343","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dissolved organic carbon (DOC), an organic carbon fraction with high activeness and mobility, migrated by runoff is a key part in carbon cycle. A rational straw mulching rate can be regulated to obtain maximum benefits while controlling runoff and sediment yield on sloping lands. However, little remains known about the optimal straw mulching rates required for effectively reducing the loss of DOC in runoff. Therefore, to overcome the existing limitations, this study investigated the effects of modified maize straw mulching rates on the loss of DOC during runoff, utilizing indoor rainfall simulation. Five mulching rates, including 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 kg m−2 [control (CK) and treatments (T1, T2, T3, and T4), respectively], were tested in combination with three slope gradients (10°, 15°, and 20°) to evaluate how straw mulching rate influences runoff, sediment yield, and runoff‐related DOC loss under a heavy rainfall intensity of 90 mm h−1. Our results showed that various straw mulching rates did not significantly differ runoff rates; however, straw mulching significantly reduced sediment concentration and yield. Moreover, the reduction in sediment yield increased with an increase in mulching rate. Compared to the CK, T1 resulted in a 63% increase in DOC loss at a slope of 20°. Additionally, T2 caused an 8% and 7.2% increase in DOC loss at both 10° and 15° slopes. Conversely, T3 and T4 reduced DOC loss by 54.1%–80.8% and 51.1%–65.2%, respectively, across all slope gradients. These results suggested that mulching rates of 0.2–0.4 kg m−2 may potentially increase DOC loss in runoff on the sloping lands. Our results hold significant importance in optimizing the use of straw mulching for sustainable management practices in agricultural lands.
坡地 Regosols 的径流、沉积物产量和与径流相关的溶解有机碳损失对不同秸秆覆盖率的响应
溶解有机碳(DOC)是一种具有高活性和流动性的有机碳组分,随径流迁移,是碳循环的关键部分。合理的秸秆覆盖率可以在控制坡地径流和沉积物产量的同时获得最大效益。然而,人们对有效减少径流中 DOC 损失所需的最佳秸秆覆盖率仍然知之甚少。因此,为了克服现有的局限性,本研究利用室内降雨模拟,研究了改进的玉米秸秆覆盖率对径流中 DOC 损失的影响。研究测试了五种覆盖率,包括 0、0.2、0.4、0.6 和 0.8 kg m-2 [分别为对照组(CK)和处理组(T1、T2、T3 和 T4)],并结合三种坡度(10°、15° 和 20°),以评估在 90 mm h-1 的强降雨强度下,秸秆覆盖率如何影响径流、沉积物产量以及与径流相关的 DOC 损失。我们的结果表明,不同的秸秆覆盖率对径流量没有显著影响,但秸秆覆盖会显著降低沉积物的浓度和产量。而且,随着覆盖率的增加,沉积物产量的减少也在增加。与 CK 相比,在坡度为 20° 时,T1 导致 DOC 损失增加了 63%。此外,在坡度为 10° 和 15° 时,T2 导致 DOC 损失分别增加了 8% 和 7.2%。相反,T3 和 T4 在所有坡度上分别减少了 54.1%-80.8% 和 51.1%-65.2% 的 DOC 损失。这些结果表明,0.2-0.4 kg m-2 的地膜覆盖率可能会增加坡地径流中 DOC 的流失。我们的研究结果对于优化秸秆覆盖在农田可持续管理实践中的应用具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信