Just Because I'm Great (and You're Not): When, Why, and How Narcissistic Individuals Give Gifts to Others

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology
Colleen P. Kirk, Constantine Sedikides, Julian Givi
{"title":"Just Because I'm Great (and You're Not): When, Why, and How Narcissistic Individuals Give Gifts to Others","authors":"Colleen P. Kirk, Constantine Sedikides, Julian Givi","doi":"10.1111/jopy.12983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveWe examined the roles of Narcissistic Admiration and Narcissistic Rivalry in gift giving. We hypothesized that Admirative and Rivalrous individuals diverge in their likelihood of giving gifts.MethodAcross six studies (Σ<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 2198), we used correlational and experimental methodology and capitalized on both scenarios and actual gift giving.ResultsNarcissistic Admiration was positively, but Narcissistic Rivalry was negatively, associated with gift‐giving likelihood (Studies 1–2). These findings were explained by diverging communal motivations for gift giving (Study 3). Consistent with the notion that Rivalrous individuals are less likely to give gifts for communal reasons because they feel threatened by social closeness, the negative association between Narcissistic Rivalry and gift‐giving likelihood was attenuated when the gift recipient was more socially distant (vs. close; Study 4). Further, gifts that are recipient‐centric (e.g., customized with a recipient's name) are less focused on attributes of the giver and less likely to foster social closeness. Therefore, consistent with Admirative individuals' use of gift giving to promote themselves as a superior communal relationship partner, the positive association between Narcissistic Admiration and gift‐giving likelihood was attenuated for gifts that were recipient‐centric (Study 5). Socially desirable responding, self‐esteem, and fear of failure (Study SM1) did not account for the findings.","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12983","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveWe examined the roles of Narcissistic Admiration and Narcissistic Rivalry in gift giving. We hypothesized that Admirative and Rivalrous individuals diverge in their likelihood of giving gifts.MethodAcross six studies (ΣN = 2198), we used correlational and experimental methodology and capitalized on both scenarios and actual gift giving.ResultsNarcissistic Admiration was positively, but Narcissistic Rivalry was negatively, associated with gift‐giving likelihood (Studies 1–2). These findings were explained by diverging communal motivations for gift giving (Study 3). Consistent with the notion that Rivalrous individuals are less likely to give gifts for communal reasons because they feel threatened by social closeness, the negative association between Narcissistic Rivalry and gift‐giving likelihood was attenuated when the gift recipient was more socially distant (vs. close; Study 4). Further, gifts that are recipient‐centric (e.g., customized with a recipient's name) are less focused on attributes of the giver and less likely to foster social closeness. Therefore, consistent with Admirative individuals' use of gift giving to promote themselves as a superior communal relationship partner, the positive association between Narcissistic Admiration and gift‐giving likelihood was attenuated for gifts that were recipient‐centric (Study 5). Socially desirable responding, self‐esteem, and fear of failure (Study SM1) did not account for the findings.
只因为我很棒(而你不是):自恋者何时、为何以及如何向他人赠送礼物
目的我们研究了自恋型仰慕和自恋型竞争在赠送礼物中的作用。我们假设,自恋型仰慕者和自恋型竞争者在赠送礼品的可能性上存在差异。方法在六项研究(ΣN = 2198)中,我们采用了相关和实验方法,并利用了情景和实际赠送礼品的情况。结果自恋型仰慕者与赠送礼品的可能性呈正相关,而自恋型竞争者与赠送礼品的可能性呈负相关(研究 1-2)。送礼的共同动机不同可以解释这些发现(研究 3)。与 "竞争型 "个体因感到社会亲近感的威胁而不太可能出于公共原因送礼这一观点相一致的是,当收礼人的社会关系更疏远时(相对于更亲近;研究 4),"自恋型竞争 "与送礼可能性之间的负相关就会减弱。此外,以受礼者为中心的礼物(例如,以受礼者的名字定制的礼物)不太注重送礼者的特质,也不太可能促进社会亲近感。因此,自恋型仰慕者通过赠送礼物将自己提升为优秀的社交关系伙伴,而以收礼者为中心的礼物则削弱了自恋型仰慕者与赠送礼物可能性之间的正相关(研究 5),这与自恋型仰慕者通过赠送礼物将自己提升为优秀的社交关系伙伴是一致的。社会期望反应、自尊和对失败的恐惧(研究 SM1)并不能解释这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信