Intake and diet preference of dairy heifers grazing mixed or alternating rows of birdsfoot trefoil and cool-season grasses

Michael D. Peel, Blair L. Waldron, Jacob T. Briscoe, Marcus F. Rose, S. Clay Isom, Kara J. Thornton, Jacob A. Hadfield, Kerry A. Rood, J. Earl Creech
{"title":"Intake and diet preference of dairy heifers grazing mixed or alternating rows of birdsfoot trefoil and cool-season grasses","authors":"Michael D. Peel,&nbsp;Blair L. Waldron,&nbsp;Jacob T. Briscoe,&nbsp;Marcus F. Rose,&nbsp;S. Clay Isom,&nbsp;Kara J. Thornton,&nbsp;Jacob A. Hadfield,&nbsp;Kerry A. Rood,&nbsp;J. Earl Creech","doi":"10.1002/glr2.12094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Mixtures with birdsfoot trefoil (BFT) increase herbage intake in grazing cattle. We hypothesized that BFT spatially separated from grasses would increase preferential grazing of BFT and herbage intake compared to grass and BFT in mixed rows.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Binary mixtures of BFT were established with orchardgrass, meadow bromegrass, tall fescue, and perennial ryegrass in alternating and in mixed rows. Pastures were rotationally stocked with Jersey heifers, and herbage mass, intake, and preferential grazing were estimated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Planting BFT in alternating rows did not affect herbage mass, intake, or BFT preference. Regardless of spatial arrangement, pasture production averaged 4116 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> per rotation, of which 32% was BFT. BFT comprised 39% of herbage intake in alternating and mixed rows, 7% greater (<i>p</i> = 0.001) than offered, indicating partial preference for BFT. Greatest preferential grazing of BFT was in tall fescue and orchardgrass mixtures, but less than commonly reported for legumes grown in more contrasting spatial arrangements with cool-season grasses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Grazing heifers showed partial preference for BFT over grass. However, the lack of an effect of spatial arrangement on herbage mass, herbage intake, and diet preference indicates that spatial arrangements greater than alternating rows may be needed to increase overall herbage intake.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100593,"journal":{"name":"Grassland Research","volume":"3 3","pages":"219-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/glr2.12094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grassland Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/glr2.12094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Mixtures with birdsfoot trefoil (BFT) increase herbage intake in grazing cattle. We hypothesized that BFT spatially separated from grasses would increase preferential grazing of BFT and herbage intake compared to grass and BFT in mixed rows.

Methods

Binary mixtures of BFT were established with orchardgrass, meadow bromegrass, tall fescue, and perennial ryegrass in alternating and in mixed rows. Pastures were rotationally stocked with Jersey heifers, and herbage mass, intake, and preferential grazing were estimated.

Results

Planting BFT in alternating rows did not affect herbage mass, intake, or BFT preference. Regardless of spatial arrangement, pasture production averaged 4116 kg ha−1 per rotation, of which 32% was BFT. BFT comprised 39% of herbage intake in alternating and mixed rows, 7% greater (p = 0.001) than offered, indicating partial preference for BFT. Greatest preferential grazing of BFT was in tall fescue and orchardgrass mixtures, but less than commonly reported for legumes grown in more contrasting spatial arrangements with cool-season grasses.

Conclusions

Grazing heifers showed partial preference for BFT over grass. However, the lack of an effect of spatial arrangement on herbage mass, herbage intake, and diet preference indicates that spatial arrangements greater than alternating rows may be needed to increase overall herbage intake.

Abstract Image

混合或交替放牧鸟脚三叶草和冷季型牧草的乳用小母牛的摄入量和日粮偏好
背景 与鸟脚三叶草(BFT)混播可增加放牧牛的草料摄入量。我们假设,与禾本科草和鸟脚三叶草混播相比,鸟脚三叶草与禾本科草在空间上分开会增加鸟脚三叶草的优先放牧率和草料摄入量。 方法 将 BFT 与果园草、草甸溴草草、高羊茅和多年生黑麦草二元混合物交替或混排种植。牧场轮流饲养泽西小母牛,并对草料质量、摄入量和优先放牧情况进行了评估。 结果 行间交替种植黑麦草不会影响牧草质量、摄入量或对黑麦草的偏好。无论空间布局如何,牧草产量平均为每公顷 4116 千克,其中 32% 为 BFT。在交替行和混合行中,BFT占草料摄入量的39%,比提供的高出7%(p = 0.001),这表明对BFT有部分偏好。在高羊茅和果园草混播中,母牛最喜欢吃 BFT,但在豆科植物与冷季型禾本科植物空间布局对比较大的情况下,母牛对 BFT 的偏好则低于通常的报道。 结论 放牧的小母牛表现出对 BFT 的部分偏好,而不是对草的偏好。然而,空间布局对草料质量、草料摄入量和日粮偏好没有影响,这表明要增加总体草料摄入量,可能需要比交替行更多的空间布局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信