Looking for a signal: how well do specialist and generalist bees track preferred host plants over time?

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
Nydia Vitale, Víctor H. Gonzalez
{"title":"Looking for a signal: how well do specialist and generalist bees track preferred host plants over time?","authors":"Nydia Vitale,&nbsp;Víctor H. Gonzalez","doi":"10.1007/s11829-024-10090-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding the factors that signal plant and pollinator phenologies is important for assessing the potential impacts of climate change. However, limited information is available on how well bees track preferred host plants over time and how traits like body size may govern differential responses among species, particularly in xeric areas where floral resources and climate are unpredictable. We studied the nesting phenology of six solitary, cavity-nesting bees that differ in host breadth and body size in the Monte Desert ecosystem, Argentina, over nine consecutive years. We used cross-correlation analysis to assess if the ability of bees to track the flowering phenology of their host plants and abiotic environment, as well as to detect potential differences between specialist and generalist bees. We found that nesting phenology is predicted by multiple flowering and climatic variables regardless of the bees’ level of specialization, and that there is a differential pattern in body size. The nesting phenology of smaller bees was predicted by the number of individuals in bloom, indicating some spatial pattern in resource availability. While the nesting phenology of some bees was predicted by flowering variables alone, that of other bees was explained by a combination of flowering and climatic variables. Our study also indicated that the inter-annual variability of nesting was greater in generalist bees than in specialist bees. These results suggest that if phenological decoupling occurs, bees might be able to restore it by detecting multiple environmental signals, and that generalist bees might be more vulnerable than previously expected.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8409,"journal":{"name":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","volume":"18 5","pages":"1053 - 1063"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11829-024-10090-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the factors that signal plant and pollinator phenologies is important for assessing the potential impacts of climate change. However, limited information is available on how well bees track preferred host plants over time and how traits like body size may govern differential responses among species, particularly in xeric areas where floral resources and climate are unpredictable. We studied the nesting phenology of six solitary, cavity-nesting bees that differ in host breadth and body size in the Monte Desert ecosystem, Argentina, over nine consecutive years. We used cross-correlation analysis to assess if the ability of bees to track the flowering phenology of their host plants and abiotic environment, as well as to detect potential differences between specialist and generalist bees. We found that nesting phenology is predicted by multiple flowering and climatic variables regardless of the bees’ level of specialization, and that there is a differential pattern in body size. The nesting phenology of smaller bees was predicted by the number of individuals in bloom, indicating some spatial pattern in resource availability. While the nesting phenology of some bees was predicted by flowering variables alone, that of other bees was explained by a combination of flowering and climatic variables. Our study also indicated that the inter-annual variability of nesting was greater in generalist bees than in specialist bees. These results suggest that if phenological decoupling occurs, bees might be able to restore it by detecting multiple environmental signals, and that generalist bees might be more vulnerable than previously expected.

寻找信号:随着时间的推移,专性蜜蜂和通性蜜蜂对首选寄主植物的追踪效果如何?
了解植物和传粉昆虫物候的信号因素对于评估气候变化的潜在影响非常重要。然而,关于蜜蜂如何随着时间的推移追踪首选寄主植物,以及体型等特征如何影响物种间的不同反应,尤其是在花卉资源和气候不可预测的干旱地区,目前的信息非常有限。我们研究了阿根廷蒙特沙漠生态系统中六种独居穴居蜜蜂连续九年的筑巢物候学,这些蜜蜂的寄主广度和体型均有所不同。我们使用交叉相关分析来评估蜜蜂跟踪寄主植物开花物候和非生物环境的能力,并检测专性蜜蜂和通性蜜蜂之间的潜在差异。我们发现,无论蜜蜂的专业化程度如何,筑巢物候都会受到多种花期和气候变量的影响,而且体型大小也存在差异。体型较小的蜜蜂的筑巢期是由开花个体的数量预测的,这表明在资源可用性方面存在某种空间模式。一些蜜蜂的筑巢物候仅由花期变量预测,而其他蜜蜂的筑巢物候则由花期和气候变量共同解释。我们的研究还表明,一般蜜蜂筑巢的年际变异性大于专化蜜蜂。这些结果表明,如果发生物候脱钩,蜜蜂可能会通过检测多种环境信号来恢复物候脱钩,而通才蜜蜂可能比以前预期的更脆弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthropod-Plant Interactions
Arthropod-Plant Interactions 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Arthropod-Plant Interactions is dedicated to publishing high quality original papers and reviews with a broad fundamental or applied focus on ecological, biological, and evolutionary aspects of the interactions between insects and other arthropods with plants. Coverage extends to all aspects of such interactions including chemical, biochemical, genetic, and molecular analysis, as well reporting on multitrophic studies, ecophysiology, and mutualism. Arthropod-Plant Interactions encourages the submission of forum papers that challenge prevailing hypotheses. The journal encourages a diversity of opinion by presenting both invited and unsolicited review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信